<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2008 Year in Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rick,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks! And thanks for all your comments. Blogging is far more rewarding when I get to interact with regular readers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anon,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes and no. It&#039;s the nature of tournament poker that even the best player will have many losses offset by occasional big wins. Thus, it&#039;s not going to be very meaningful to look at my results minus my biggest tournament win, given that I spent nearly $120,000 on tournament entries over the course of the year. Of course I did occasionally win stuff other than the WSOP, including my WSOP seat in fact, but I&#039;d still have a pretty pathetic ROI without it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On the other hand, it&#039;s true that if you exclude tournaments altogether, my cash results also aren&#039;t quite where I thought they&#039;d be. That is, as you say, largely a result of not putting in the hours. Once I had damn near what I had aimed to make for the year locked up in early July, I was definitely less motivated to keep grinding for the remainder of the year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Thanks! And thanks for all your comments. Blogging is far more rewarding when I get to interact with regular readers.</p>
<p>Anon,</p>
<p>Yes and no. It&#8217;s the nature of tournament poker that even the best player will have many losses offset by occasional big wins. Thus, it&#8217;s not going to be very meaningful to look at my results minus my biggest tournament win, given that I spent nearly $120,000 on tournament entries over the course of the year. Of course I did occasionally win stuff other than the WSOP, including my WSOP seat in fact, but I&#8217;d still have a pretty pathetic ROI without it.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it&#8217;s true that if you exclude tournaments altogether, my cash results also aren&#8217;t quite where I thought they&#8217;d be. That is, as you say, largely a result of not putting in the hours. Once I had damn near what I had aimed to make for the year locked up in early July, I was definitely less motivated to keep grinding for the remainder of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kirchhausen		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirchhausen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andrew,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for what you do on your blog, I really enjoy your poker analysis that goes along with your hand histories.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Congrats again on a deep run at the WSOP!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Good luck in 2009,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Thanks for what you do on your blog, I really enjoy your poker analysis that goes along with your hand histories.</p>
<p>Congrats again on a deep run at the WSOP!</p>
<p>Good luck in 2009,</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like after excluding the main event score you had a bit of an off year, at least by your expectations.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any idea what happened?  Played fewer hours than anticipated after the main event?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like after excluding the main event score you had a bit of an off year, at least by your expectations.</p>
<p>Any idea what happened?  Played fewer hours than anticipated after the main event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-783</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Geoff,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thankfully that&#039;s a function of my poor Excel skills rather than poor poker skills. I did not lose the year&#039;s profits in a drunken stupor on New Year&#039;s Eve as this graph suggests.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Todd,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes but against this particular player floating the flop is not good (though not awful- I was planning to fold if he bet the turn but that flush draw came....)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff,</p>
<p>Thankfully that&#8217;s a function of my poor Excel skills rather than poor poker skills. I did not lose the year&#8217;s profits in a drunken stupor on New Year&#8217;s Eve as this graph suggests.</p>
<p>Todd,</p>
<p>Yes but against this particular player floating the flop is not good (though not awful- I was planning to fold if he bet the turn but that flush draw came&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TODD		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TODD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the largest pot lost- it&#039;s only a bad play if he has the Q...?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He&#039;s prob not getting 200bb&#039;s in with 99-JJ here or Ax.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the largest pot lost- it&#8217;s only a bad play if he has the Q&#8230;?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s prob not getting 200bb&#8217;s in with 99-JJ here or Ax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/01/2008-year-in-review/#comment-781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[wait a minute, if you look at that graph it shows you losing all your profit on like day 364!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait a minute, if you look at that graph it shows you losing all your profit on like day 364!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
