<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gross Spot Vs. Peter Eastgate	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karbyn,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the question. I should say first that that comment was somewhat in jest. Obviously I didn&#039;t entirely believe it, or I would have folded. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That said, I do think his play is pretty suspicious and looks quite a bit like quads. Check-raising bare trips on the turn I can see. But was he trying to check-raise TPTK (or worse) on the flop? That&#039;s what I can&#039;t see. He very well may overbet shove a bare 9 on the river, but does he check one on the flop?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, though, largely tongue-in-cheek.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karbyn,</p>
<p>Thanks for the question. I should say first that that comment was somewhat in jest. Obviously I didn&#8217;t entirely believe it, or I would have folded. </p>
<p>That said, I do think his play is pretty suspicious and looks quite a bit like quads. Check-raising bare trips on the turn I can see. But was he trying to check-raise TPTK (or worse) on the flop? That&#8217;s what I can&#8217;t see. He very well may overbet shove a bare 9 on the river, but does he check one on the flop?</p>
<p>Again, though, largely tongue-in-cheek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: karbyn		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karbyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure how he &quot;only&quot; had 99 on that hand.  Why not As9x? or T9?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could you explain more please?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how he &#8220;only&#8221; had 99 on that hand.  Why not As9x? or T9?</p>
<p>Could you explain more please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anon,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not at all. I am saying, though, that when a guy has a big tournament win and jumps into a high stakes cash game, the sharks circle. Even guys who don&#039;t usually play those stakes will move up to play with him. So a less ethical player than myself might be tempted to make a new account impersonating a high-profile tourney winner so that he gets action from guys who wouldn&#039;t otherwise play him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>Not at all. I am saying, though, that when a guy has a big tournament win and jumps into a high stakes cash game, the sharks circle. Even guys who don&#8217;t usually play those stakes will move up to play with him. So a less ethical player than myself might be tempted to make a new account impersonating a high-profile tourney winner so that he gets action from guys who wouldn&#8217;t otherwise play him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are you saying Eastgate is a bad tournament player?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying Eastgate is a bad tournament player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fuel55		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuel55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[quads over quads is vicious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quads over quads is vicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eugene		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/2009/05/gross-spot-vs-peter-eastgate/#comment-951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I understand he was down 40k at some point of the session. Not sure if he made a come back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand he was down 40k at some point of the session. Not sure if he made a come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
