<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Advanced Bluff Induction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:47:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/#comment-3941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3411#comment-3941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/#comment-3939&quot;&gt;Logan&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey, good to hear from you! It depends a ton on what he thinks of me, what he thinks I think of him, etc. He also needs to turn a pair into a bluff sometimes here or I will never pay him off when he has a legit hand. Like, he pretty much never has zero showdown value on the river, so unless he turns weak pairs into bluffs, he&#039;s never bluffing.

That said, I&#039;ve picked off some big bluffs from him before, and I actually don&#039;t think the history was right for him to attempt this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/#comment-3939">Logan</a>.</p>
<p>Hey, good to hear from you! It depends a ton on what he thinks of me, what he thinks I think of him, etc. He also needs to turn a pair into a bluff sometimes here or I will never pay him off when he has a legit hand. Like, he pretty much never has zero showdown value on the river, so unless he turns weak pairs into bluffs, he&#8217;s never bluffing.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ve picked off some big bluffs from him before, and I actually don&#8217;t think the history was right for him to attempt this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Logan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/advanced-bluff-induction/#comment-3939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3411#comment-3939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So is this a bad bluff since according to you it&#039;s readily apparent that his range does not consist of many flushes?  I suppose that assumes he understands you know he is capable of turning a made hand into a bluff.

When are you going on your road trip?  I&#039;ve been waiting for blog updates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this a bad bluff since according to you it&#8217;s readily apparent that his range does not consist of many flushes?  I suppose that assumes he understands you know he is capable of turning a made hand into a bluff.</p>
<p>When are you going on your road trip?  I&#8217;ve been waiting for blog updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
