Comments on: Folding Out Draws https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/11/folding-out-draws/ Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:43:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Pete https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/11/folding-out-draws/#comment-3975 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:20:47 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3455#comment-3975 In reply to Pete.

Oop, fixed now.

]]> By: Pete https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/11/folding-out-draws/#comment-3974 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:04:41 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3455#comment-3974 What is misleading is the stack size of the villain. The article indicates that he only has $528.25.

]]> By: foucault https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/11/folding-out-draws/#comment-3972 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:19:21 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3455#comment-3972 In reply to zydee.

Oh, he wasn’t UTG. I don’t think I would have 3-bet him with this hand if he had been. Sorry if my comments were misleading.

]]> By: zydee https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/11/folding-out-draws/#comment-3971 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:59:32 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3455#comment-3971 Hey Andrew,
The article said villain raised from button but in your comments you said he raised from UTG. If its UTG wouldnt it make his flat stronger, as your 3bet range is stronger than if it was a button open?. Im not sure what the postion is but how would your post flop line change Vs button or UTG raiser?

]]>