<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: If ever there were a spot to fold bottom set on a dry board for 109BB&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christoph		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christoph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4208#comment-4069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the presence of the fish in the hand actually makes it closer than it would be without him, cause imo it&#039;s not impossible you&#039;re betting like AJ-AK and UTG+1 calls you with AQ/AK, knowing that you&#039;ll value bet your Ax hands to get value from the fish. What I don&#039;t like at all is his shove on the turn cause on such a dry board I can&#039;t see any worse hands call him. However I think the fish in the hand makes it closer between a fold and a call on the turn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the presence of the fish in the hand actually makes it closer than it would be without him, cause imo it&#8217;s not impossible you&#8217;re betting like AJ-AK and UTG+1 calls you with AQ/AK, knowing that you&#8217;ll value bet your Ax hands to get value from the fish. What I don&#8217;t like at all is his shove on the turn cause on such a dry board I can&#8217;t see any worse hands call him. However I think the fish in the hand makes it closer between a fold and a call on the turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4208#comment-4068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4067&quot;&gt;Joe&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, I limp a decent amount from early position at full ring tables. I did a whole video about it for Poker Savvy Plus, but the bottom line is that I usually limp small to medium pairs, sometimes good suited connectors, sometimes stuff like AKo or AQs, and sometimes big pairs. If raised, I pretty much always re-raise the big pairs and the AK. I usually either call or fold the pairs, I sometimes call the AQs/AJs, and sometimes re-raise the suited connectors. It&#039;s probably not perfect, but it&#039;s balanced enough for a situation that doesn&#039;t come up too frequently and that no one&#039;s really putting much effort into exploiting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4067">Joe</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, I limp a decent amount from early position at full ring tables. I did a whole video about it for Poker Savvy Plus, but the bottom line is that I usually limp small to medium pairs, sometimes good suited connectors, sometimes stuff like AKo or AQs, and sometimes big pairs. If raised, I pretty much always re-raise the big pairs and the AK. I usually either call or fold the pairs, I sometimes call the AQs/AJs, and sometimes re-raise the suited connectors. It&#8217;s probably not perfect, but it&#8217;s balanced enough for a situation that doesn&#8217;t come up too frequently and that no one&#8217;s really putting much effort into exploiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4208#comment-4067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree if there was a spot to fold bottom set this clearly would be it with the action that has taken place.  My question is are you usually limping 88 here in this spot instead of raising it? What other hands would you limp UTG like this?  Is it game dependent where you don&#039;t think that this will be exploited?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree if there was a spot to fold bottom set this clearly would be it with the action that has taken place.  My question is are you usually limping 88 here in this spot instead of raising it? What other hands would you limp UTG like this?  Is it game dependent where you don&#8217;t think that this will be exploited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rakewell		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/if-ever-there-were-a-spot-to-fold-bottom-set-on-a-dry-board-for-109bb/#comment-4064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakewell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4208#comment-4064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting. Just two days ago I was on the bad end of a similar spot, the rare situation in which I only retrospectively realized that I had had enough information to fold bottom set on a dry flop, but didn&#039;t put the pieces together until it was too late. See: http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2010/01/folding-set.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Just two days ago I was on the bad end of a similar spot, the rare situation in which I only retrospectively realized that I had had enough information to fold bottom set on a dry flop, but didn&#8217;t put the pieces together until it was too late. See: <a href="http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2010/01/folding-set.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2010/01/folding-set.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
