Comments on: Review: Rush Poker

By: Robert Pattinson

Robert Pattinson — Mon, 03 May 2010 11:30:05 +0000

lol one or two of the opinions individuals submit crack me up, now and again i think about if they truly read the article and content before placing a comment or whether or not they just look at the title of the post and submit only the first thought that drifts into their minds. nonetheless, it really is relaxing to read through sensible commentary once in a while rather than the exact same, classic blog vomit which i almost always see on the internet

By: Poker Bonus

Poker Bonus — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:51:25 +0000

Very nice blog to get lots of information about poker. i will certainly come back and read more..

By: Chris M

Chris M — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:45:14 +0000

In reply to foucault. Its buried somewhere in either the HSNL rush thread or HNSL **** thread

By: foucault

foucault — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:03:09 +0000

In reply to Chris M. Link? I'm surprised to hear that. I guess it's tough for guys like that to get action, but I can't imagine they're going to do implement it at high stakes anyway. I mean, HU is basically rush poker already.

By: foucault

foucault — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:57:30 +0000

In reply to Gunslinger. Aha! I'd heard there were 1/2 games, but I couldn't find them. Thanks very much for the tip.

By: Gunslinger

Gunslinger — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:41 +0000

FYI, $1/$2 NL rush has been available for a couple of days, you just have to click the higher stakes filters to see it.

By: Chris M

Chris M — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:40:23 +0000

What I don’t get is why some well respected hnslers (caby, ike, others) are calling for HU Rush Poker

Maaybe if you rotate between 3-4 opponents and can sorta build some meta in between hands it makes a little sense, otherwise seems like a terrible idea.