<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sweet Post Oak Bluff	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4213#comment-4082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4078&quot;&gt;Mac&lt;/a&gt;.

If anything, I think a short stack is more likely to just fold if he has nothing and not even think about whether he&#039;s supposed to call with K-high. I&#039;m not trying to get him to make some monster laydown, I think I am plenty profitable if he just folds all of his unpaired hands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4078">Mac</a>.</p>
<p>If anything, I think a short stack is more likely to just fold if he has nothing and not even think about whether he&#8217;s supposed to call with K-high. I&#8217;m not trying to get him to make some monster laydown, I think I am plenty profitable if he just folds all of his unpaired hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4213#comment-4081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4079&quot;&gt;Christoph&lt;/a&gt;.

There&#039;s a big difference between Q-high and K-high here. I&#039;d definitely shove Q-high. I guess I can see a case for check-calling K-high, but it probably wouldn&#039;t even occur to me in the heat of the moment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4079">Christoph</a>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a big difference between Q-high and K-high here. I&#8217;d definitely shove Q-high. I guess I can see a case for check-calling K-high, but it probably wouldn&#8217;t even occur to me in the heat of the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christoph		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christoph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4213#comment-4079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been trying those small bets recently and I like them a lot. If your bet is like 90 into 520 it has to work less than 1/6 times to break even. 76/JT/non Ahigh diamonds are a decent part of his range and your hand has 0 SD value. What would you do with Jhigh or Qhigh in this spot?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying those small bets recently and I like them a lot. If your bet is like 90 into 520 it has to work less than 1/6 times to break even. 76/JT/non Ahigh diamonds are a decent part of his range and your hand has 0 SD value. What would you do with Jhigh or Qhigh in this spot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mac		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/01/sweet-post-oak-bluff/#comment-4078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4213#comment-4078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that against a full stack this is a profitable shove. Do you think that someone 1/3 stacking is generally going to fold after getting 2/3rds in (tournament logic, I know)? I agree it looked like they were drawing as well and as played you represented strong holdings. I just see these fish steam off the last of their shortings a fair amount (granted, I really do not play cash much anymore).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that against a full stack this is a profitable shove. Do you think that someone 1/3 stacking is generally going to fold after getting 2/3rds in (tournament logic, I know)? I agree it looked like they were drawing as well and as played you represented strong holdings. I just see these fish steam off the last of their shortings a fair amount (granted, I really do not play cash much anymore).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
