<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Set, a Big Bet, and a Board That&#8217;s Wet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/a-set-a-big-bet-and-a-board-thats-wet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/a-set-a-big-bet-and-a-board-thats-wet/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/a-set-a-big-bet-and-a-board-thats-wet/#comment-4172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4339#comment-4172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Andrew,

I&#039;m just curious why you like his flop bet-size, as I think it&#039;s really awkward in terms of turn stack sizes.

Any turn bet he makes on this board texture is going to be pot committing, so he&#039;s effectively reduced this hand to a 1 street hand, but hasn&#039;t picked a bet-size that actually &quot;accomplishes&quot; that.

I feel like if his goal is to make you make a &#039;committing&#039; decision he should take a pot flop shove turn line, and if his goal is to play 3 streets, he should go 1/2 pot, 1/2 pot, 1/2 pot.

I mean, if he has AA here, a turn bet of ~3,000 is effectively the same thing as shoving.  The only difference is that he relies on you making the connection that 3000 = his stack.

At 40/80, i&#039;m pretty sure he&#039;s going to give you enough credit of realizing he&#039;s never bet/folding the turn, or not shoving river after betting turn once he makes such a big turn bet.

Obviously its more expensive to c-bet pot on this board with air for the times he has KQ and plans on bet-folding the flop, but I just feel like turn stack sizes are really awkward for the &#039;goal&#039; we&#039;d hope to accomplish.

Thoughts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious why you like his flop bet-size, as I think it&#8217;s really awkward in terms of turn stack sizes.</p>
<p>Any turn bet he makes on this board texture is going to be pot committing, so he&#8217;s effectively reduced this hand to a 1 street hand, but hasn&#8217;t picked a bet-size that actually &#8220;accomplishes&#8221; that.</p>
<p>I feel like if his goal is to make you make a &#8216;committing&#8217; decision he should take a pot flop shove turn line, and if his goal is to play 3 streets, he should go 1/2 pot, 1/2 pot, 1/2 pot.</p>
<p>I mean, if he has AA here, a turn bet of ~3,000 is effectively the same thing as shoving.  The only difference is that he relies on you making the connection that 3000 = his stack.</p>
<p>At 40/80, i&#8217;m pretty sure he&#8217;s going to give you enough credit of realizing he&#8217;s never bet/folding the turn, or not shoving river after betting turn once he makes such a big turn bet.</p>
<p>Obviously its more expensive to c-bet pot on this board with air for the times he has KQ and plans on bet-folding the flop, but I just feel like turn stack sizes are really awkward for the &#8216;goal&#8217; we&#8217;d hope to accomplish.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
