<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Set That Might Be Foldable (or not River Shovable Anyway)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/</link>
	<description>Poker strategy blog, poker book reviews, trip reports and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4306#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>I thought about this hand a little, it can&#039;t be a bad shove with 55 without a solid read on hero&#039;s game and the fish&#039;s calling range being significantly wide.

Even if hero isn&#039;t ever calling with a worse hand, you only have 3 combos in your range villain plausibly loses to, whereas fish&#039;s range is significantly wide and probably pays off enough to make a shove ok.

So yeah, like you said, even if he can&#039;t shove for value vs you, there&#039;s likely enough value vs the fish to make it ok.

If you ever peel flop with something like a gutty or pair + FD (67ss, 78ss, KQss) he can probably show a profit given your not calling this river bet 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought about this hand a little, it can&#8217;t be a bad shove with 55 without a solid read on hero&#8217;s game and the fish&#8217;s calling range being significantly wide.</p>
<p>Even if hero isn&#8217;t ever calling with a worse hand, you only have 3 combos in your range villain plausibly loses to, whereas fish&#8217;s range is significantly wide and probably pays off enough to make a shove ok.</p>
<p>So yeah, like you said, even if he can&#8217;t shove for value vs you, there&#8217;s likely enough value vs the fish to make it ok.</p>
<p>If you ever peel flop with something like a gutty or pair + FD (67ss, 78ss, KQss) he can probably show a profit given your not calling this river bet 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foucault</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4306#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Kitty. It&#039;s definitely close no matter what. It&#039;s definitely easier for BB to call flop and turn with me calling rather than leading out. I don&#039;t know about the river- IMO it looks stronger for me to bet than check, but God knows what or whether a fish would be thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Kitty. It&#8217;s definitely close no matter what. It&#8217;s definitely easier for BB to call flop and turn with me calling rather than leading out. I don&#8217;t know about the river- IMO it looks stronger for me to bet than check, but God knows what or whether a fish would be thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foucault</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4306#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>He can&#039;t shove for value vs. me. The complication, and the reason I played this way, is that BB is a super-fish. I think that makes it a lot closer for Villain, since he doesn&#039;t necessarily need to be ahead of my calling range to show a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He can&#8217;t shove for value vs. me. The complication, and the reason I played this way, is that BB is a super-fish. I think that makes it a lot closer for Villain, since he doesn&#8217;t necessarily need to be ahead of my calling range to show a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4306#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no hand UTG is leading turn with that isn&#039;t shoving this river for value when checked to.

I agree this isn&#039;t a value-shove with 55.  Every combo draw hero could have peeled given pre-flop has hit. QTss, 67ss are ahead, and KQss (discounted) is never calling river.


K9hh is the only hand hero villain beats that gets to this river given hero&#039;s line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no hand UTG is leading turn with that isn&#8217;t shoving this river for value when checked to.</p>
<p>I agree this isn&#8217;t a value-shove with 55.  Every combo draw hero could have peeled given pre-flop has hit. QTss, 67ss are ahead, and KQss (discounted) is never calling river.</p>
<p>K9hh is the only hand hero villain beats that gets to this river given hero&#8217;s line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KittyLiquor</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/another-set-that-might-be-foldable-or-not-river-shovable-anyway/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>KittyLiquor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4306#comment-4146</guid>
		<description>But the fish is more likely to call with you leading -vs- a shove, call?

Besides, if UTG folds, he gets the &quot;was I bluffed?&quot; vibe started. :)

Poker is soooo much easier away from the table. (but still hard, for me anyway, lol) I think it&#039;s probably pretty close no matter how it&#039;s played.

PS. Tell your girlfriend/webmaster it&#039;s 2010! (copyright at bottom of page. hehe)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the fish is more likely to call with you leading -vs- a shove, call?</p>
<p>Besides, if UTG folds, he gets the &#8220;was I bluffed?&#8221; vibe started. <img src='http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Poker is soooo much easier away from the table. (but still hard, for me anyway, lol) I think it&#8217;s probably pretty close no matter how it&#8217;s played.</p>
<p>PS. Tell your girlfriend/webmaster it&#8217;s 2010! (copyright at bottom of page. hehe)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

