<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Thin Turn Check-Raise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4316#comment-4162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4156&quot;&gt;Chris M&lt;/a&gt;.

Meh, it&#039;s obviously not the ideal card, but straight draws still missed. He can fear that my calling range is strong and still believe that I&#039;ll have a lot of air that beats his 7-high or whatever but can&#039;t call a bet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4156">Chris M</a>.</p>
<p>Meh, it&#8217;s obviously not the ideal card, but straight draws still missed. He can fear that my calling range is strong and still believe that I&#8217;ll have a lot of air that beats his 7-high or whatever but can&#8217;t call a bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4316#comment-4156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4155&quot;&gt;Chris M&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think I made this clear - what I mean to say is:

If he&#039;s not betting 78 he clearly views your river range as super polarized.  Once he bet/calls turn he very likely has improved on this river.

If he&#039;s not going to bet a very strong here, for fear that your range is so strong, why do you expect him to bluff?

Obviously you don&#039;t know he&#039;s going to check a hand like 78 on this river, but I think the 9h either significantly increases his bluffing frequency with 1 pair hands worse than A6 that feels they can rep a flush / straight once you check b/c you&#039;re never checking a strong hand, or he just valuebets every time your beat.

Without a read that he can turn made hands into bluffs, I dont see many bluffs in his range.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4155">Chris M</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I made this clear &#8211; what I mean to say is:</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s not betting 78 he clearly views your river range as super polarized.  Once he bet/calls turn he very likely has improved on this river.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s not going to bet a very strong here, for fear that your range is so strong, why do you expect him to bluff?</p>
<p>Obviously you don&#8217;t know he&#8217;s going to check a hand like 78 on this river, but I think the 9h either significantly increases his bluffing frequency with 1 pair hands worse than A6 that feels they can rep a flush / straight once you check b/c you&#8217;re never checking a strong hand, or he just valuebets every time your beat.</p>
<p>Without a read that he can turn made hands into bluffs, I dont see many bluffs in his range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/02/thin-turn-check-raise/#comment-4155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4316#comment-4155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This seems like one of the worst rivers to c/c on (?)

Given you that its rare that your C/R this turn, you&#039;re saying you effectively rep a polarized range.  Is villain really going to float and then bluff this river with A high?

Like, are you really C/Ring AJo here or something?  Once he calls your C/R, I see very few hands in his range that need to bluff this river that we&#039;re ahead of.  Yes, a hand like 67 might decide you never check a value hand here and opts to bluff river, but otherwise, every draw got there, and your line is so unlikely to be a marginal 1 pair hand, that he&#039;ll either beat you by checking back with SD value, or understand you&#039;re never c/fing this river.

I guess its hard to compare him not betting 78 to him wanting to bluff JT if he got here, but what range are you putting him on that bet/calls the turn that wants/needs to bluff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like one of the worst rivers to c/c on (?)</p>
<p>Given you that its rare that your C/R this turn, you&#8217;re saying you effectively rep a polarized range.  Is villain really going to float and then bluff this river with A high?</p>
<p>Like, are you really C/Ring AJo here or something?  Once he calls your C/R, I see very few hands in his range that need to bluff this river that we&#8217;re ahead of.  Yes, a hand like 67 might decide you never check a value hand here and opts to bluff river, but otherwise, every draw got there, and your line is so unlikely to be a marginal 1 pair hand, that he&#8217;ll either beat you by checking back with SD value, or understand you&#8217;re never c/fing this river.</p>
<p>I guess its hard to compare him not betting 78 to him wanting to bluff JT if he got here, but what range are you putting him on that bet/calls the turn that wants/needs to bluff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
