Comments on: Dude, That’s My Bet https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/ Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment. Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:03:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: foucault https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4343 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:09:59 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4343 In reply to Mac.

I’m going to try putting them in color, but actually several people left comments saying they couldn’t see the suit images at work.

]]> By: foucault https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4342 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:09:26 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4342 In reply to James Antill.

Simpler even than that- there’s a tool in WordPress to change the text color with a click. I’ll try it for a few posts and see if I get annoyed by it.

]]> By: foucault https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4341 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:08:00 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4341 In reply to Luke.

Thanks for the suggestion, but it’s not as simple as that. The whole shebang is produced by a hand converter, ie a website where I enter the text hand history and it turns into HTML code suitable for blog posting. I’d have to change all the links by hand, which I don’t relish doing.

]]> By: Luke https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4340 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:28:22 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4340 Yup there were quite a few of us who couldn’t see the suits previously. Thanks for the efforts Andrew, this makes it a lot easier to follow, though you might consider just hosting the previous images on imageshack or something? I don’t think any corporate firewall is going to block that..

]]> By: Chris C https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4339 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:53:56 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4339 Well it’s a big improvement for me – thanks!

]]> By: James Antill https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4338 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:30:01 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4338 [/span], [span style="color: #f00"]7♥[/span], [span style="color: #00f"]10♦[/span] ?]]> In reply to James Antill.

Bah, it stripped all the tags … how hard is it to do:

[span style=”color: #f00″]4♥[/span], [span style=”color: #f00″]7♥[/span], [span style=”color: #00f”]10♦[/span]

?

]]> By: James Antill https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4337 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:28:58 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4337 , 7♥, 10♦ ...how hard is it for you to do: 4♥, 7♥, 10♦ ?]]> Instead of doing:

4♥, 7♥, 10♦

…how hard is it for you to do:

4♥, 7♥, 10♦

?

]]> By: Mac https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4336 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:07:26 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4336 I say let’s go back to the old way… It seems like it was just one person who could not view the suits at work as I had no problem. These characters are difficult to differentiate

]]> By: foucault https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4334 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:16:52 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4334 In reply to Michael McGillen.

This is as it should be. They are treated as characters now, just like a letter, number, or # sign, rather than as images. I imagine it’s a bit harder to follow for those who could see the images but considerably easier for those who could not.

]]> By: Michael McGillen https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/dude-thats-my-bet/#comment-4333 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:55:09 +0000 http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4457#comment-4333 NB: On my browser all suits now appear black (even diamonds and hearts).

]]>