<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hand Reading With the Stars	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick C		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4252&quot;&gt;foucault&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you all for taking the time to reply.

Obviously I accept that the games I play in live, although a lot larger are also easier for the reasons stated. I guess my best course of action is to drop down to maybe 0.50/1 and beat that well before moving on. It&#039;s a question of motivation I suppose, playing so far below what I play for live and for amounts that is not really that meaningful to me. The ends will justify the means I hope! I&#039;ll of course watch your videos to compliment this ;-D

Thanks once again,

Nick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4252">foucault</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you all for taking the time to reply.</p>
<p>Obviously I accept that the games I play in live, although a lot larger are also easier for the reasons stated. I guess my best course of action is to drop down to maybe 0.50/1 and beat that well before moving on. It&#8217;s a question of motivation I suppose, playing so far below what I play for live and for amounts that is not really that meaningful to me. The ends will justify the means I hope! I&#8217;ll of course watch your videos to compliment this ;-D</p>
<p>Thanks once again,</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4250&quot;&gt;Chris M&lt;/a&gt;.

Nick,

I wanted to take my time giving you a thorough answer, but then Chris went and did a very good job explaining things. I&#039;ll add just two comments:

1. Online poker isn&#039;t just harder, it&#039;s different. People play more aggressively, stacks are shallower, there are no live reads, etc. It&#039;s not necessarily true that a guy beating $.5/$1 online could sit down and win in a 5/10 live game, though with a little practice I think he&#039;d be a favorite.

2. The 10x rule breaks down after 5/10 live, mostly because the games are hard to find. A 10/25 live table will have more fish than a 1/2 online table, but it will usually have at least one if not more players who are better than just about anyone at 2/4 online. You might still beat the game, but you&#039;ll have some far tougher decisions than you would in your online game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4250">Chris M</a>.</p>
<p>Nick,</p>
<p>I wanted to take my time giving you a thorough answer, but then Chris went and did a very good job explaining things. I&#8217;ll add just two comments:</p>
<p>1. Online poker isn&#8217;t just harder, it&#8217;s different. People play more aggressively, stacks are shallower, there are no live reads, etc. It&#8217;s not necessarily true that a guy beating $.5/$1 online could sit down and win in a 5/10 live game, though with a little practice I think he&#8217;d be a favorite.</p>
<p>2. The 10x rule breaks down after 5/10 live, mostly because the games are hard to find. A 10/25 live table will have more fish than a 1/2 online table, but it will usually have at least one if not more players who are better than just about anyone at 2/4 online. You might still beat the game, but you&#8217;ll have some far tougher decisions than you would in your online game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4250&quot;&gt;Chris M&lt;/a&gt;.

10x harder for their stakes, I should say.

If you can beat $$.25/.50 No limit online for example, $2/$5 live should be no different for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4250">Chris M</a>.</p>
<p>10x harder for their stakes, I should say.</p>
<p>If you can beat $$.25/.50 No limit online for example, $2/$5 live should be no different for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Nick,

Chris here from PokerSavvy.

I just want to point out that 2/4 online is a much tougher game than 5/10 live.  In general, online games are normally about 10x harder than their live counterparts.

You are playing against people who, in general, (At 2/4+) are members of poker training sites, have played hundreds of thousands (yes, 100,000+) hands, have stat tracking programs, and are [in general] very solid players.

Players playing 5/10 live are often casual players who play poker maybe once a month, don&#039;t have solid fundamentals, and have issues with tilt, giving off tells, etc.

So - just because the online stakes are smaller, doesn&#039;t mean the games are easier.  Quite the contrary.

Many players would rather play 8 tables of $2/$4 than 1 table of $5/$10.  Your hourly rate is much higher :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>Chris here from PokerSavvy.</p>
<p>I just want to point out that 2/4 online is a much tougher game than 5/10 live.  In general, online games are normally about 10x harder than their live counterparts.</p>
<p>You are playing against people who, in general, (At 2/4+) are members of poker training sites, have played hundreds of thousands (yes, 100,000+) hands, have stat tracking programs, and are [in general] very solid players.</p>
<p>Players playing 5/10 live are often casual players who play poker maybe once a month, don&#8217;t have solid fundamentals, and have issues with tilt, giving off tells, etc.</p>
<p>So &#8211; just because the online stakes are smaller, doesn&#8217;t mean the games are easier.  Quite the contrary.</p>
<p>Many players would rather play 8 tables of $2/$4 than 1 table of $5/$10.  Your hourly rate is much higher 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christoph		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christoph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obv I&#039;m not Andrew, but I&#039;d recommend you to watch the series on flop, turn and river play. Those were the ones that I think helped me the most.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obv I&#8217;m not Andrew, but I&#8217;d recommend you to watch the series on flop, turn and river play. Those were the ones that I think helped me the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick C		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/03/hand-reading-with-the-stars/#comment-4238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=4409#comment-4238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew,

I hope you are well. Slightly off topic but I thought I&#039;d mail you anyway! I actually just joined PokerSavvy last week to see how it would help my game. I play live cash up to 5/10 full ring and online around the 2/4 mark, also some tournament poker althoug its hard to get the time for this being a Dad! I am very much a winning live player, but a breakeven tournament player and breakeven online cash player other than around the $55 sng mark where i&#039;m a big winner. Tell me, its awfully hard to get the time to watch all the Poker Savvy videos. If you were to recommend a series or two for both NL cash and tournaments where would you start? 

How can I win so consistently live (at a much higher limit too) yet not transfer those results to online play? I am only 34, so not quite a poker dinosoar yet!! Live I undersstand exactly where I am in a hand pretty much all the time, online I can feel lost and often obligated to call down in bad spots, I can get trapped into playing too aggresively, I tend to just play 2 tables at a time, but I never feel like the best player at the table. Live I always feel like i&#039;m one of the best at the table. Having this kind of confidence is a big thing I believe.

Anyway, still very much enjoying your blog and I look forward to some of your videos. Any help greatly appreciated!

Kind Regards.

Nick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>I hope you are well. Slightly off topic but I thought I&#8217;d mail you anyway! I actually just joined PokerSavvy last week to see how it would help my game. I play live cash up to 5/10 full ring and online around the 2/4 mark, also some tournament poker althoug its hard to get the time for this being a Dad! I am very much a winning live player, but a breakeven tournament player and breakeven online cash player other than around the $55 sng mark where i&#8217;m a big winner. Tell me, its awfully hard to get the time to watch all the Poker Savvy videos. If you were to recommend a series or two for both NL cash and tournaments where would you start? </p>
<p>How can I win so consistently live (at a much higher limit too) yet not transfer those results to online play? I am only 34, so not quite a poker dinosoar yet!! Live I undersstand exactly where I am in a hand pretty much all the time, online I can feel lost and often obligated to call down in bad spots, I can get trapped into playing too aggresively, I tend to just play 2 tables at a time, but I never feel like the best player at the table. Live I always feel like i&#8217;m one of the best at the table. Having this kind of confidence is a big thing I believe.</p>
<p>Anyway, still very much enjoying your blog and I look forward to some of your videos. Any help greatly appreciated!</p>
<p>Kind Regards.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
