Comments on: The Re-Squeeze

By: foucault

foucault — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:38:30 +0000

The better my hand and the bigger the pot, the less I care about strong reads. Like Greylock said, I’m not too worried about CO. Even if he calls, he’ll rarely have me in terrible shape. I do like to have at least an inkling that the squeezer is going to be squeezy, though.

Range still matters even if the situation only comes up once. I’d say though that KTs is better than some Axs, because you’ll probably get called by AQ but not KQ. Against a range of {TT+,AJs+,AQo+}, KTs performs about 3% better than A2s.

By: foucault

foucault — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:31:27 +0000

Sorry grey, I know I should have checked your exact wording, just being lazy. Sorry for slandering you….

By: foucault

foucault — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:30:44 +0000

Actually I don’t watch HSP, but FWIW I’ve heard some well-respected online cash players say surprisingly flattering things about Esfandiari.

By: Alex

Alex — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:06:53 +0000

Hey Andrew, sorry for the unrelated question. Would be very curious to ask you a few opinions about the current seasons of High Stakes Poker on TV (assuming you watch it). (a) what do you think about Negreanu’s play? (b) In general, what do you think about the level of play? Is it possible that old-timers like Elezra/Esfandiari/Hansen go through any of ‘higher’ level thinking that online 25-50/50-100NL pros do? what about dwan/manieri? Thank you!

By: greylocks

greylocks — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:10:09 +0000

I didn’t say “pretty much always” but no big deal.

To answer Christoph, I think with the great majority of 2/4 players, once CO calls the three-bet rather than four-betting himself, you can assume CO doesn’t have enough hand to call a four-bet shove. So it comes down primarily to what you think SB’s range is.