<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call That Down	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5596#comment-5191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5182&quot;&gt;russ&lt;/a&gt;.

The pre-flop sizing varies by position. I raise more when I&#039;m in early position than when I&#039;m in late position, because my range is stronger. This is an idea I explain in greater detail in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/issue65/andrew-brokos-poker-strategy-no-free-hunch.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5182">russ</a>.</p>
<p>The pre-flop sizing varies by position. I raise more when I&#8217;m in early position than when I&#8217;m in late position, because my range is stronger. This is an idea I explain in greater detail in <a href="http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/issue65/andrew-brokos-poker-strategy-no-free-hunch.php" rel="nofollow">this article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5596#comment-5189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5188&quot;&gt;Jeremy&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi guys. I&#039;m sorry to say there&#039;s not a lot of fancy psychology behind it. Just a little OCD on my part plus, as Jeremy guessed, a desire to type bet amounts more quickly when multi-tabling. I will say that choosing &quot;weird&quot; bet amounts makes it a little easier to conceal the times when I&#039;m varying my bet size based on the strength of my hand in some potentially exploitable way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5188">Jeremy</a>.</p>
<p>Hi guys. I&#8217;m sorry to say there&#8217;s not a lot of fancy psychology behind it. Just a little OCD on my part plus, as Jeremy guessed, a desire to type bet amounts more quickly when multi-tabling. I will say that choosing &#8220;weird&#8221; bet amounts makes it a little easier to conceal the times when I&#8217;m varying my bet size based on the strength of my hand in some potentially exploitable way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5596#comment-5188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5182&quot;&gt;russ&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m with you on that Russ -&#062; I am also interested to know the reasoning behind the odd numbers. I think Andrew might have bet the 111 and 666 for the purpose of multi tabling because it is quicker to type the same number 3 times.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5182">russ</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on that Russ -&gt; I am also interested to know the reasoning behind the odd numbers. I think Andrew might have bet the 111 and 666 for the purpose of multi tabling because it is quicker to type the same number 3 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: russ		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/06/call-that-down/#comment-5182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5596#comment-5182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andrew, would you elaborate on bet sizes in the second hand.  Any reason for 4BB on the pre-flop vs. 3BB, 3.5BB, etc.?
Also, your value bets are all basically 70% of pot in this hand, but you are taking the time to be creative with odd numbers.  
I know there are psycological effects at work with some numbers, which is why items in a store are $1.99 versus $2.00.  Any of that at play here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, would you elaborate on bet sizes in the second hand.  Any reason for 4BB on the pre-flop vs. 3BB, 3.5BB, etc.?<br />
Also, your value bets are all basically 70% of pot in this hand, but you are taking the time to be creative with odd numbers.<br />
I know there are psycological effects at work with some numbers, which is why items in a store are $1.99 versus $2.00.  Any of that at play here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
