<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Day 2A Table Draw	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5649#comment-5268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5266&quot;&gt;Ryan&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the encouragement. They really were pretty good. I don&#039;t believe I was -EV, but they were good enough that I wasn&#039;t messing around too much, and I wasn&#039;t catching many cards either. I wouldn&#039;t say they were ultra-aggro, but appropriately aggro. Enough so that playing back at them was going to be very high variance. Today was much better, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5266">Ryan</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the encouragement. They really were pretty good. I don&#8217;t believe I was -EV, but they were good enough that I wasn&#8217;t messing around too much, and I wasn&#8217;t catching many cards either. I wouldn&#8217;t say they were ultra-aggro, but appropriately aggro. Enough so that playing back at them was going to be very high variance. Today was much better, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5649#comment-5266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andrew, where&#039;s the confidence? In the past when I&#039;ve read your hand posts, one common thread with regard to your opponents is that you don&#039;t &quot;give props&quot; lightly. Was your Day 1 table that good? Does ultra-aggro necessarily = good? Does &quot;everyone is younger than me&quot; mean you&#039;re minus EV? Certainly you aren&#039;t one who carelessly conflates. I&#039;ve no doubt you can out-play these fools! So power on -- lest wannabes like me stop reading your blog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, where&#8217;s the confidence? In the past when I&#8217;ve read your hand posts, one common thread with regard to your opponents is that you don&#8217;t &#8220;give props&#8221; lightly. Was your Day 1 table that good? Does ultra-aggro necessarily = good? Does &#8220;everyone is younger than me&#8221; mean you&#8217;re minus EV? Certainly you aren&#8217;t one who carelessly conflates. I&#8217;ve no doubt you can out-play these fools! So power on &#8212; lest wannabes like me stop reading your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tce		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5649#comment-5263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anyone have link for where to find our own table draws?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have link for where to find our own table draws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pat Barnes		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/day-2a-table-draw-2/#comment-5262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5649#comment-5262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Knowledge is power! When you wrote about Day 1 I had a deja vu that you had other difficult Day 1s, and you even thrived! Remember it&#039;s the irritation that makes the pearl. We&#039;ll be rooting for you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowledge is power! When you wrote about Day 1 I had a deja vu that you had other difficult Day 1s, and you even thrived! Remember it&#8217;s the irritation that makes the pearl. We&#8217;ll be rooting for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
