<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Squeeze Min-Check-Raising For Information	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jordan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5638#comment-5246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[interesting line, and certainly unorthodox. But assuming that flop hits their ranges well, its got to be better than barreling into the nuts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting line, and certainly unorthodox. But assuming that flop hits their ranges well, its got to be better than barreling into the nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5638#comment-5242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5236&quot;&gt;Chris M&lt;/a&gt;.

Tough questions. I guess on a true blank I&#039;d have to assume I&#039;m good, but I think I&#039;d check-fold any board-pairing or straight-completing card.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5236">Chris M</a>.</p>
<p>Tough questions. I guess on a true blank I&#8217;d have to assume I&#8217;m good, but I think I&#8217;d check-fold any board-pairing or straight-completing card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: todd		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5638#comment-5237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GL tomorrow! GO GO GO!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GL tomorrow! GO GO GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/squeeze-min-check-raising-for-information/#comment-5236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5638#comment-5236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[v interesting thought process.

How are you proceeding if:

1) UTG folds / BTN flats
2) UTG flats / BTN flats

I assume in both scenarios you assume your hand is best, and on any brick turn your plan is to bet/..fold?  Check/decide?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>v interesting thought process.</p>
<p>How are you proceeding if:</p>
<p>1) UTG folds / BTN flats<br />
2) UTG flats / BTN flats</p>
<p>I assume in both scenarios you assume your hand is best, and on any brick turn your plan is to bet/..fold?  Check/decide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
