<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Trouble With TAGfish	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5574&quot;&gt;CardRak&lt;/a&gt;.

Putting me on a value hand is only half the battle, though. I think he&#039;s going to have just as much difficulty putting me on a hand that needs to bluff. I think a TAGfish is more likely to default to folding than calling when value bets and bluffs make equally little sense to him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5574">CardRak</a>.</p>
<p>Putting me on a value hand is only half the battle, though. I think he&#8217;s going to have just as much difficulty putting me on a hand that needs to bluff. I think a TAGfish is more likely to default to folding than calling when value bets and bluffs make equally little sense to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CardRak		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CardRak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like it as his betting all value hands on the turn......If I was him tho I would wonder what value hands your doing this with as its a weird line to take and im closing my eyes and calling with a Q.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it as his betting all value hands on the turn&#8230;&#8230;If I was him tho I would wonder what value hands your doing this with as its a weird line to take and im closing my eyes and calling with a Q.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5559&quot;&gt;pheal&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ll say first that I think betting would be fine. Also, importantly, I don&#039;t expect Villain to bet the flop all that often. I&#039;m hoping it goes check/check. I guess I&#039;d say his pre-flop range is pretty narrow, and when I&#039;m ahead I&#039;m way ahead but not getting three streets of value. So, I don&#039;t need to bet the flop, either for value or for protection.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5559">pheal</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say first that I think betting would be fine. Also, importantly, I don&#8217;t expect Villain to bet the flop all that often. I&#8217;m hoping it goes check/check. I guess I&#8217;d say his pre-flop range is pretty narrow, and when I&#8217;m ahead I&#8217;m way ahead but not getting three streets of value. So, I don&#8217;t need to bet the flop, either for value or for protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5537&quot;&gt;Lin Sherman&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s nothing to do with good enough, just mixing it up. There&#039;s nothing wrong with betting the flop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5537">Lin Sherman</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nothing to do with good enough, just mixing it up. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with betting the flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5539&quot;&gt;Curtis T&lt;/a&gt;.

I think he pretty much always folds a Q here. I wouldn&#039;t be raising if I didn&#039;t.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5539">Curtis T</a>.</p>
<p>I think he pretty much always folds a Q here. I wouldn&#8217;t be raising if I didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5562</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5540&quot;&gt;Rob&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m sure they would, but it&#039;s not a situation that comes up all that often. It matters a bit that I&#039;m UTG, but honestly I don&#039;t see a TAGfish calling KQ here any time soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5540">Rob</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they would, but it&#8217;s not a situation that comes up all that often. It matters a bit that I&#8217;m UTG, but honestly I don&#8217;t see a TAGfish calling KQ here any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pheal		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pheal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[please tell me whats ur thought process that led u to c/c the flop instead of betting it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please tell me whats ur thought process that led u to c/c the flop instead of betting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alexoxol		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alexoxol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Typically WA/WB situation. Tough decision. wp.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically WA/WB situation. Tough decision. wp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5539&quot;&gt;Curtis T&lt;/a&gt;.

that&#039;s why were c/ring]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5539">Curtis T</a>.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s why were c/ring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well played.  How often would you say you do this vs. folding?  I have to imagine at some point they catch on or get frustrated and call with their KQ/AQ.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well played.  How often would you say you do this vs. folding?  I have to imagine at some point they catch on or get frustrated and call with their KQ/AQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Curtis T		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am curious if you think he ever folds a Q here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious if you think he ever folds a Q here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lin Sherman		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/07/the-trouble-with-tagfish/#comment-5537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin Sherman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5717#comment-5537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I&#039;m good enough to check-call the flop here. I think I would have just bet out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m good enough to check-call the flop here. I think I would have just bet out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
