<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: One Mistake	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m actually curious about the 4-bet this deep with T7s.  

With 200bb stacks i&#039;d think you&#039;d want your bluff 4-bets to be slightly more nutted drawing hands, specifically to avoid this situation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually curious about the 4-bet this deep with T7s.  </p>
<p>With 200bb stacks i&#8217;d think you&#8217;d want your bluff 4-bets to be slightly more nutted drawing hands, specifically to avoid this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bigblatch		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5613</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigblatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5611&quot;&gt;foucault&lt;/a&gt;.

Another question if you don&#039;t mind. :)  Is the reason to raise bigger with the draw to commit himself to calling if you shove over top?  And for the smaller-sized raises, assuming he had a balanced range, I take it he&#039;d make them with made hands and complete air?

This is a great blog, BTW.  Glad I discovered it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5611">foucault</a>.</p>
<p>Another question if you don&#8217;t mind. 🙂  Is the reason to raise bigger with the draw to commit himself to calling if you shove over top?  And for the smaller-sized raises, assuming he had a balanced range, I take it he&#8217;d make them with made hands and complete air?</p>
<p>This is a great blog, BTW.  Glad I discovered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5602&quot;&gt;bigblatch&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;d be surprised. In a situation like this, there&#039;s not a lot I can do about it, and I can see why he might prefer to just play his hand and take the chance of me figuring out what it is. Only if I&#039;m good enough to do something like fold this hand or shove on him with Ace-high does it really become a problem that he&#039;s turned his hand face up as a big draw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5602">bigblatch</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised. In a situation like this, there&#8217;s not a lot I can do about it, and I can see why he might prefer to just play his hand and take the chance of me figuring out what it is. Only if I&#8217;m good enough to do something like fold this hand or shove on him with Ace-high does it really become a problem that he&#8217;s turned his hand face up as a big draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bigblatch		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigblatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I take it the &quot;draw&quot; read is highly opponent-dependent?  Surely a good heads-up player wouldn&#039;t size their bets in such a way that it&#039;s obvious when they&#039;re raising with a draw.  Alls I know is I have a long way to go--in that situation I stack off with your hand every time without blinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it the &#8220;draw&#8221; read is highly opponent-dependent?  Surely a good heads-up player wouldn&#8217;t size their bets in such a way that it&#8217;s obvious when they&#8217;re raising with a draw.  Alls I know is I have a long way to go&#8211;in that situation I stack off with your hand every time without blinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5596&quot;&gt;Jeremy&lt;/a&gt;.

I think folding the flop is best, actually. I guess I could call and get it in if I turn a pair or a straight, but folding flop is better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5596">Jeremy</a>.</p>
<p>I think folding the flop is best, actually. I guess I could call and get it in if I turn a pair or a straight, but folding flop is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5597&quot;&gt;piefarmer&lt;/a&gt;.

I certainly didn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; I was good. I decided I was good often enough to call just because this was a good sequence of cards for him to bluff/semi-bluff. Pre-flop he 3-bet maybe 15-20% of the time and knew I was calling him light, so it doesn&#039;t take much for him to bet the flop. Then he could easily have turned a draw or just fired again with air, and then the Ace looks like a good card to bluff. His bet sizing on the river is suspicious, as I&#039;m not even sure he&#039;d bet that much with an Ace. Especially if I&#039;m putting him on a polarized range, I think he gets to the river with plenty enough air to warrant a call.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5597">piefarmer</a>.</p>
<p>I certainly didn&#8217;t <em>know</em> I was good. I decided I was good often enough to call just because this was a good sequence of cards for him to bluff/semi-bluff. Pre-flop he 3-bet maybe 15-20% of the time and knew I was calling him light, so it doesn&#8217;t take much for him to bet the flop. Then he could easily have turned a draw or just fired again with air, and then the Ace looks like a good card to bluff. His bet sizing on the river is suspicious, as I&#8217;m not even sure he&#8217;d bet that much with an Ace. Especially if I&#8217;m putting him on a polarized range, I think he gets to the river with plenty enough air to warrant a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5598&quot;&gt;Doug&lt;/a&gt;.

Meh, you probably know I don&#039;t like the draw/made hand distinction. I think it would be much worse for him to stick his money in with 9d8d even though that would be top pair rather than &quot;just&quot; a draw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5598">Doug</a>.</p>
<p>Meh, you probably know I don&#8217;t like the draw/made hand distinction. I think it would be much worse for him to stick his money in with 9d8d even though that would be top pair rather than &#8220;just&#8221; a draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sick $ put in both on draws....sick game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sick $ put in both on draws&#8230;.sick game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: piefarmer		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[piefarmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the second hand, you impress a novice like me with the three straight flat calls.  Did you know you were good because he never raised you (or switched to a check-raise)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the second hand, you impress a novice like me with the three straight flat calls.  Did you know you were good because he never raised you (or switched to a check-raise)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/one-mistake/#comment-5596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5736#comment-5596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now that you know that he had a bigger flush draw, what is the correct/best play on the turn? Should you just fold to his re-raise or maybe call and bluff him on the turn/river?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you know that he had a bigger flush draw, what is the correct/best play on the turn? Should you just fold to his re-raise or maybe call and bluff him on the turn/river?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
