<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Same Satellite, Similar Bluff	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/#comment-6085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5816#comment-6085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/#comment-6083&quot;&gt;DHM0219&lt;/a&gt;.

Meh. Obviously there&#039;s nothing wrong with 3-betting either of these, but in both cases I feel like a 3-bet would look very very strong. In the first instance, I may occasionally get him to fold some smallish pairs but he&#039;s also getting away from AQ/AJ if I 3-bet. Especially considering that I can get away with stuff like this post-flop, I prefer calling one.

Second one is a lot closer, but honestly I don&#039;t think people are expecting re-steals before the ante stages of a tournament, when stacks are still so deep. If I 3-bet him and he calls with 77, I think he plays it primarily for set value post-flop. We&#039;re too deep for me to want to play for stacks post-flop with AA even in a 3-bet pot, and I think for similar reasons he&#039;s more likely to overvalue one pair in a 2-bet pot than in a 3-bet pot. 

That may very well be giving too much credit t a tourney donk, though....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/#comment-6083">DHM0219</a>.</p>
<p>Meh. Obviously there&#8217;s nothing wrong with 3-betting either of these, but in both cases I feel like a 3-bet would look very very strong. In the first instance, I may occasionally get him to fold some smallish pairs but he&#8217;s also getting away from AQ/AJ if I 3-bet. Especially considering that I can get away with stuff like this post-flop, I prefer calling one.</p>
<p>Second one is a lot closer, but honestly I don&#8217;t think people are expecting re-steals before the ante stages of a tournament, when stacks are still so deep. If I 3-bet him and he calls with 77, I think he plays it primarily for set value post-flop. We&#8217;re too deep for me to want to play for stacks post-flop with AA even in a 3-bet pot, and I think for similar reasons he&#8217;s more likely to overvalue one pair in a 2-bet pot than in a 3-bet pot. </p>
<p>That may very well be giving too much credit t a tourney donk, though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DHM0219		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/08/same-satellite-similar-bluff/#comment-6083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DHM0219]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5816#comment-6083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[how are we not 3betting both hands pre?  the AK hand i&#039;m really not going to love playing post flop OOP against a top tier villian, especially with the depth of stacks

the AA hand seemslike a slam dunk 3bet as it can easily look like a resteal, and with ~100 BB stacks it seems really bad not to be building a pot in a spot where we can get called or even 4b on the light side]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how are we not 3betting both hands pre?  the AK hand i&#8217;m really not going to love playing post flop OOP against a top tier villian, especially with the depth of stacks</p>
<p>the AA hand seemslike a slam dunk 3bet as it can easily look like a resteal, and with ~100 BB stacks it seems really bad not to be building a pot in a spot where we can get called or even 4b on the light side</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
