<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Antes Up!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/#comment-6327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5845#comment-6327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/#comment-6309&quot;&gt;Rob&lt;/a&gt;.

Truthfully I&#039;m not wild about the idea of &quot;proper&quot; or &quot;standard&quot; pre-flop raise sizing, either. I think it depends on factors like who is behind you, who is in the blinds, what your and their stacks look like, etc. What I liked about this tournament is that it punished all the players who just knew to always raise X in certain situations, because they saw JohnnyBax do it or whatever, but don&#039;t really understand the reasoning behind it well enough to apply it in a different context.

And yeah, people were definitely folding too often to small raises.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/#comment-6309">Rob</a>.</p>
<p>Truthfully I&#8217;m not wild about the idea of &#8220;proper&#8221; or &#8220;standard&#8221; pre-flop raise sizing, either. I think it depends on factors like who is behind you, who is in the blinds, what your and their stacks look like, etc. What I liked about this tournament is that it punished all the players who just knew to always raise X in certain situations, because they saw JohnnyBax do it or whatever, but don&#8217;t really understand the reasoning behind it well enough to apply it in a different context.</p>
<p>And yeah, people were definitely folding too often to small raises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2010/09/antes-up/#comment-6309</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=5845#comment-6309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What would you assign as a proper preflop raise size, relative to the ante?  Something like 6x the ante (almost 2/3 pot)?

Also, were people getting away with raising so small (at least I think it is small), like to 550 in the the second hand when the ante is 125?  I mean, that will still lay an enticing price.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would you assign as a proper preflop raise size, relative to the ante?  Something like 6x the ante (almost 2/3 pot)?</p>
<p>Also, were people getting away with raising so small (at least I think it is small), like to 550 in the the second hand when the ante is 125?  I mean, that will still lay an enticing price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
