<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mailbag: Multiway Pots	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/mailbag-multiway-pots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/mailbag-multiway-pots/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:18:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wat?		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/mailbag-multiway-pots/#comment-23874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wat?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8269#comment-23874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andrew, thank you for writing this.  I often find HU much more difficult than multi-way pots, precisely because in multi-way pots there is usually so much more information available vis-a-vi the other players and their actions.

Example from a loose $1-2 game I was in recently:

Tricky player raises to $7 UTG. two loose player call, I call with 22, and the BB calls.

Flop:
2d6s8s

Original raiser bets $15, two calls, and I raise to $60 (230 behind). BB calls and the original raiser shoves for $320. Two folds and it is back to me.

Given all the information, I figure that my bottom set is no good, and fold.  The BB calls with 9s10s and the original better shows a set of 8s.  

Had this been a heads-up hand, I don&#039;t think I could have folded, but the multi-pot action gave me enough information to correctly throw away the hand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, thank you for writing this.  I often find HU much more difficult than multi-way pots, precisely because in multi-way pots there is usually so much more information available vis-a-vi the other players and their actions.</p>
<p>Example from a loose $1-2 game I was in recently:</p>
<p>Tricky player raises to $7 UTG. two loose player call, I call with 22, and the BB calls.</p>
<p>Flop:<br />
2d6s8s</p>
<p>Original raiser bets $15, two calls, and I raise to $60 (230 behind). BB calls and the original raiser shoves for $320. Two folds and it is back to me.</p>
<p>Given all the information, I figure that my bottom set is no good, and fold.  The BB calls with 9s10s and the original better shows a set of 8s.  </p>
<p>Had this been a heads-up hand, I don&#8217;t think I could have folded, but the multi-pot action gave me enough information to correctly throw away the hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
