<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What&#8217;s Your Play? Flopped Trips Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/whats-your-play-flopped-trips-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/whats-your-play-flopped-trips-results/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NimhOfJoy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/whats-your-play-flopped-trips-results/#comment-24115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NimhOfJoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8278#comment-24115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I learned a new term today: Scandi-Float.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned a new term today: Scandi-Float.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gareth		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/whats-your-play-flopped-trips-results/#comment-23947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gareth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8278#comment-23947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The proof is in the pudding as they say. I often argue for something which I suspect won&#039;t be the line Andrew posits is best, but in the end always end up agreeing with the results post (though I haven&#039;t let him know before haha). Anyways here I would be so disinclined to agree with his original line if not for the fact that villain both raised KQ on the flop (ostensibly to stack off?) and called the river shove with KQ. If you had asked me pre-results I would have said both of those facts were very unlikely independently and impossible together. But this seems like a case where the results do indeed go to show something. What a strange way to play KQ.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proof is in the pudding as they say. I often argue for something which I suspect won&#8217;t be the line Andrew posits is best, but in the end always end up agreeing with the results post (though I haven&#8217;t let him know before haha). Anyways here I would be so disinclined to agree with his original line if not for the fact that villain both raised KQ on the flop (ostensibly to stack off?) and called the river shove with KQ. If you had asked me pre-results I would have said both of those facts were very unlikely independently and impossible together. But this seems like a case where the results do indeed go to show something. What a strange way to play KQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
