<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mailbag: Commitment Decisions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24855</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24796&quot;&gt;hans&lt;/a&gt;.

Great questions - keep an eye on the mailbag (published every Thursday) for my answers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24796">hans</a>.</p>
<p>Great questions &#8211; keep an eye on the mailbag (published every Thursday) for my answers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24806&quot;&gt;Oil Can Nick&lt;/a&gt;.

Villain here had JT. You think he would have folded that to a flop shove getting 3:1? Not that we&#039;d mind if he did - he&#039;d be getting the right odds to call against our actual hand - but I sure wouldn&#039;t expect it. In fact I don&#039;t think Villain is ever folding after check-raising half of Hero&#039;s stack on this board.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24806">Oil Can Nick</a>.</p>
<p>Villain here had JT. You think he would have folded that to a flop shove getting 3:1? Not that we&#8217;d mind if he did &#8211; he&#8217;d be getting the right odds to call against our actual hand &#8211; but I sure wouldn&#8217;t expect it. In fact I don&#8217;t think Villain is ever folding after check-raising half of Hero&#8217;s stack on this board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24829&quot;&gt;kartman35&lt;/a&gt;.

Yep, that&#039;s what I meant - fixed the OP, thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24829">kartman35</a>.</p>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s what I meant &#8211; fixed the OP, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kartman35		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24829</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kartman35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You can read more about important concepts like pot commitment and SPR in Ed Miller et al’s excellent Small Stakes No Limit Hold ‘Em.


Actually it was Professional No Limit Hold &#039;Em by the same authors that really addressed these concepts...In SSNL (which is a better book overall imo) they touch on it but the other book goes into more depth on these specific issues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read more about important concepts like pot commitment and SPR in Ed Miller et al’s excellent Small Stakes No Limit Hold ‘Em.</p>
<p>Actually it was Professional No Limit Hold &#8216;Em by the same authors that really addressed these concepts&#8230;In SSNL (which is a better book overall imo) they touch on it but the other book goes into more depth on these specific issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oil Can Nick		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24806</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oil Can Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Adnrew, are you suggesting going all in on the flop with the intention of getting villian to fold or to call?  I dont think villian is calling with anything worse than your hand so I assume you are just looking for a fold.  Is that correct?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adnrew, are you suggesting going all in on the flop with the intention of getting villian to fold or to call?  I dont think villian is calling with anything worse than your hand so I assume you are just looking for a fold.  Is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hans		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[related question, do you have goals in terms of stack size... as a cash player, i&#039;m comfortable with 100bb or so, but in tourneys, i find myself between 10bb and 20bb a lot of the times... trying to get near 100bb is impossible in the mid game so should i just be satisfied if my stack is above average?

i&#039;ve asked this question on 2+2 but didn&#039;t receive a proper answer... so, if my stack is below average, is it time for aggressive all ins/raises, assuming we are around 10-20BB? when do you start feeling a little safe, when you are around double other people&#039;s stacks at your table or double the average in the field?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>related question, do you have goals in terms of stack size&#8230; as a cash player, i&#8217;m comfortable with 100bb or so, but in tourneys, i find myself between 10bb and 20bb a lot of the times&#8230; trying to get near 100bb is impossible in the mid game so should i just be satisfied if my stack is above average?</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve asked this question on 2+2 but didn&#8217;t receive a proper answer&#8230; so, if my stack is below average, is it time for aggressive all ins/raises, assuming we are around 10-20BB? when do you start feeling a little safe, when you are around double other people&#8217;s stacks at your table or double the average in the field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TaddisVonBaddis		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TaddisVonBaddis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Related to Scott&#039;s question, how do you adjust your playable hand range to compensate for short, almost turbo like tournament structures with 20 minute levels?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related to Scott&#8217;s question, how do you adjust your playable hand range to compensate for short, almost turbo like tournament structures with 20 minute levels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/mailbag-commitment-decisions/#comment-24772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8327#comment-24772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew,

Good analysis.  I regularly play these short stacked tourneys at my local casino.  We only start with 6000 in chips, the blinds start at 25/50 but double every 20 minutes except for one level where they go from 400/800 to 500/1000.  I have a regular debate with one of the dealers regarding what point you need to shove regardless or your cards.  I believe that once I have ten big blinds or less, which comes up frequently with these structures, I need to shove regardless or my holdings.  He argues that because everyone is comparably short stacked I can afford to let my stack get smaller waiting for better holdings.  Should the low M of my opponents make me shove more judiciously, or do you feel both the dealer and I are being too conservative and I should shove any chance I get until I have a larger stack?  Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>Good analysis.  I regularly play these short stacked tourneys at my local casino.  We only start with 6000 in chips, the blinds start at 25/50 but double every 20 minutes except for one level where they go from 400/800 to 500/1000.  I have a regular debate with one of the dealers regarding what point you need to shove regardless or your cards.  I believe that once I have ten big blinds or less, which comes up frequently with these structures, I need to shove regardless or my holdings.  He argues that because everyone is comparably short stacked I can afford to let my stack get smaller waiting for better holdings.  Should the low M of my opponents make me shove more judiciously, or do you feel both the dealer and I are being too conservative and I should shove any chance I get until I have a larger stack?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
