Friday, June 27, 2008

June

Hey, a winning month! Maybe I am not so bad at this game after all. There are still a few days to go, but I probably won't be playing much if at all. As you may have noticed, I haven't been playing the last few days either. I leave for Las Vegas on July 1st, and once out there I'll obviously be devoting quite a lot of time to poker, so I'm buckling down now on some of my other projects.

Granted I'm about to turn around and spend all of June's winnings in Las Vegas, but I was going to play the main event anyway, so the winnings are still very meaningful. And if you count staking profits, June turns into a damn fine month.

I was playing smaller stakes, though deep-stacked, and ran at about 4 BB/100 over 19K hands.

Non-poker stuff, which is where I devoted a lot of my time, is going great as well. The school system is really excited about the debate league and committed to investing in it, and we're very close to hiring an extremely qualified new director. I wish I had a bit more time for poker, but as I said, the first part of July will be dedicated to it, and once there's a paid employee working on the debate stuff, I should have more free time as well.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Can't Win 'Em All

I was having trouble getting the ESPN360 feed to work. I finally got it streaming just in time to hear, "There are eight players left, Tom Chambers has busted out." Whoops. I don't know the full story, but apparently he got all in with top set and lost to a rivered flush. 20K's nothing to sneeze at, though. Nice run, Tom.

Labels: , , ,

Tom Chambers Scores Another WSOP Final Table

My buddy Tom (LearnedFromTV), who's already been tearing up the 2008 WSOP with a second place finish for $140K in the $2500 Stud/8-O/8 Mixed event and a shallow cash in the $1000 Razz, has made his second final table of the series, this time in the $1500 PLO/8. Once again, I'm very excited for Tom and for myself, the proud owner of 10% of Tom's winnings. It's nice to be freerolling the WSOP before I've even arrived in Las Vegas.

The Final Table:

Martin Klaser: 345,000
Erik Seidel: 320,000
Michael Fetter: 290,000
Tom Chambers: 283,000
Jonathan Maren: 210,000
Casey Kastle: 170,000
Larry Wright: 150,000
Joseph Haddad: 135,000
Chad Burum: 120,000

Average Stack: 216,000

Payouts

1 $216,219

2 $137,985
3 $83,538
4 $68,304
5 $56,019
6 $44,206
7 $34,389
8 $27,027
9 $19,656

This is going to be broadcast live ("with no hole cards and horrible commentary", Tom warns) on ESPN360 at 2PM Vegas time today. I've got a ton of work to do before leaving town tomorrow, but I'll probably have this on in the background anyway.

One Two times, dealer!

Labels: , ,

Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin on Death and Online Poker

George Carlin, one of my favorite stand-up comedians, died yesterday at the age of 71. I was fortunate enough to see him live at the Orleans in December, and of course now I'm doubly glad that I took advantage of the opportunity to see him when I had it.

I saw him perform the bit on death shown here. In the last few seconds, he even mentions online poker as possible entertainment for people in heaven!

Needless to say, a George Carlin stand-up routine is NSFW.

WSOP Here I Come!

After spending more than enough money to buy in directly, I finally won a freaking main event seat in one of the last $650 satellites Stars will be running. Counting the spending money and sponsorship deal that comes with the package, I think that I ended up breaking even on satellites almost to the dollar.

It wasn't a particularly interesting tournament, but I did make one tight fold fairly early on. I raised QQ UTG, and the BB min-re-raised me. I didn't have quite the right odds to chase a set, but I called anyway and then folded when he bet half his stack on a ragged flop. Obviously I'm not 100% sure I was beat, and the guy did turn out to be a pretty aggressive player, but I still have my doubts about just how wide his range is for min-re-raising an UTG raise.

I also found myself folding both AK and KK preflop much later in the tournament, but those were actually trivially easy situations. In both cases I had a safe stack, we were one player away from the bubble, and there was a massive chipleader open shoving every hand. There was just no reason to get involved, even with AA.

Speaking of which, here was an interesting spot that I saw at another table on the bubble:

Poker Stars, $615 + $35 NL Hold'em Tournament, 3,500/7,000 Blinds, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: 42,162
UTG+1: 52,824
UTG+2: 56,370
MP1: 88,111
MP2: 84,791
CO: 12,672
BTN: 169,828
SB: 18,412
BB: 59,926

Pre-Flop: (16,800)
5 folds, CO raises to 11,972 and is All-In, BTN calls 11,972, SB folds, BB calls 4,972

Flop: (45,716) T 8 8 (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

Turn: (45,716) 6 (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

River: (45,716) T (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

Results: 45,716 Pot
CO showed A A (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON 22,858 (+10,186 NET)
BTN mucked and LOST (-12,672 NET)
BB showed A A (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON 22,858 (+10,186 NET)


It's to the BB's credit that he played this correctly. I think a lot of people would have reshoved with AA there, but he's much better guaranteeing that the BTN goes to showdown and increasing the odds of the short stack getting eliminated.

Feels good to win this, because now I don't have to waste time and effort booking a hotel, finding someone to pay me to wear their clothing, etc. Just nice to have all that stuff taken care of.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Collecting Casino Chips

The New York Times ran a neat article today about a convention of casino chip collectors this weekend in Las Vegas. In case you need another excuse not to play the slots, you can apparently hit the jackpot even if you don't deposit your chip:
Last year, Eric Rosenblum, a lawyer from Merrick, N.Y., sold a $100 chip he picked up in the 1980s at the now defunct Desert Inn casino here for $20,000. Returning home from a vacation some 45 years ago, a Missouri woman, Sandy Marbs, threw a $1 chip from the Showboat Casino, once a Las Vegas mainstay, into her jewelry box. Last month, she sold it on eBay for nearly $29,000.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, June 21, 2008

ewiofhlshfdsfakjf You Knew What I Had!!!

Full Tilt Poker, $3/$6 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 4 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BTN: $1,249.10
SB: $600
BB: $1,385.25
Hero (UTG): $1,542.65

Pre-Flop: Q J dealt to Hero (UTG)
Hero raises to $21, BTN calls $21, SB folds, BB calls $15

Flop: ($66) 9 3 K (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $66, BTN raises to $180, BB folds, Hero calls $114

Turn: ($426) 7 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($426) 7 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $300, Hero raises to $1,341.65 and is All-In,

BTN: kings full
BTN: %$&$
BTN has requested TIME
BTN calls $748.10, and is all in

Results: $2,522.20 Pot ($2 Rake)
BTN showed 9 A (a flush, Ace high) and WON $2,520.20 (+$1,271.10 NET)
Hero showed Q J (a pair of Sevens) and LOST (-$1,249.10 NET)


I can't really fault him for this call, because the nut flush is the best hand he could possibly have after this line and folding the top of his range is obviously super-exploitable. But at the same time, he had no reason to think I was capable of floating the flop with a gut shot and then check-raise bluffing the river when he had obviously made a flush. I really don't think he put me on a bluff, especially based on the chat, he just didn't want to let go of the flush. Of course trying to bluff people off of flushes at 3/6 (or in general really) is not good poker, but I really thought this guy would be "good" enough to let it go.

Then again I don't need to be floating the flop out of position with a gutshot, either, but I was pretty sure he had a flush draw and I could take it away on a non-spade river. I think that was correct, but when the board paired, I decided to go with this.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

WCOOP Schedule Nearly Finalized

BryanS, the awesome guy who represents Poker Stars on the 2+2 Forums, just posted a nearly final draft of the schedule for their annual World Championship of Online Poker. As usual, it looks like it's going to be a ground-breaking event for internet poker, featuring some huge buy-ins, some multi-day events, and some new tournament formats like NL 2-7 single draw that to my knowledge are not offered anywhere on the internet.

I don't envision myself playing any of the 10K+ buyin events, as I'd need to get a backer and the fields will probably be pretty tough anyway. But I'm excited about pretty much everything else. I like that a lot of the lesser played games have small enough buy-ins that I can afford to take a chance on them and that that chance will be subsidized by players even worse than myself doing the same.

Hopefully my non-poker schedule for this year will work out so that I'm able to play most of the events. It's nice that, since this is the internet, one can play events that run simultaneously. This is a big complaint from some at the WSOP. Now I just need to build up a bankroll on Stars. Thankfully Poker Savvy pays me in Stars money...




Some notes...

1. The event types "Mixed Hold'em", "Variety", and "NL 2-7 Single Draw" are planned and in development. If for some unforseen reason the development is not able to be completed in time for the 2008 WCOOP, these events will be replaced by other games.

2. The event name "Variety" is perhaps a bit ambiguous. We plan to hold an event which is a combination of the following games: Triple Draw 2-7, all five segments of HORSE, NL Single Draw 2-7, PL Omaha, and NL Hold'em. After much deliberation without coming up with a satisfactory name for it, we're asking our players... what do YOU think we should call such a tournament?

3. We have two "Mixed Hold'em" events on the schedule, though we debated replacing one of them with a second Omaha Hi/Lo tournament. What do you think of this? In terms of what we'll actually spread, this is pretty much the last one up for debate... we want to know what you think! Please discuss.

4. Regarding tournament times: while we would love to come up with the one time on the schedule that is perfect for everyone all over the world, this is of course impossible... no such "one perfect time" exists. We have done our best to schedule the events to reach as many of our players as possible, including our European friends who will no doubt enjoy the 14:30 (19:30 UK, 20:30 CET) tournaments which now appear every day on the schedule. We do regret that some players may miss events they'd play if they could, due to off-PokerStars obligations (work, etc), but we feel that this is unavoidable and that the schedule is rich with many chances to play.

5. Regarding 2-day events: in the end the decision was made that it's best to begin the biggest events on the biggest day. Some players, particularly our European players, will likely have to plan to take Monday off of work if they play in one of the big 2-day NLHE events. It would hardly be fair to say that we're not catering to our European players, though, as a majority of the weekday events are at times which will require our North American players to shuffle their schedules to play at all.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Top Pair No Good?

More often than not I end up regretting big moves like this in tournaments, but I think this one is alright. It worked, anyway.

Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 120/240 Blinds, 25 Ante, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

MP: 25,020
CO: 25,268
BTN: 3,120
SB: 6,095
Hero (BB): 6,510
UTG: 7,269

Pre-Flop: (510) 2 A dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG folds, MP raises to 720, CO calls 720, 2 folds, Hero calls 480

Flop: (2,430) K J 5 (3 Players)
Hero checks, MP checks, CO checks

Turn: (2,430) A (3 Players)
Hero checks, MP checks, CO bets 960, Hero calls 960, MP calls 960

River: (5,310) 9 (3 Players)
Hero bets 4,805 and is All-In, 2 folds

Results: 5,310 Pot
Hero mucked 2 A and WON 5,310 (+3,605 NET)


MP was new to the table, but so far he'd been pretty tight/straightforward. CO was a giant calling station, especially pre-flop. He was in like 70% of pots, rarely as the aggressor. He pretty much always potted it when he liked his hand, but would call with as little as a gutshot.

Preflop and flop are pretty standard. Leading the turn is an option, but really I'm still not happy with my hand, and I want to see what happens behind me. If MP bets or if CO pots it, I'm folding. I wasn't sure what to make of CO's bet, but getting nearly 4:1, I think it's a call. When MP overcalls, I decide my hand is probably not good. If I'm lucky, I'll get a chop.

But when the river falls, I think a flush is a very reasonable holding for me, and more importantly, I wasn't too concerned about anyone else having it. MP passed up two opportunities to bet, which makes me think he probably didn't have a flush draw. And CO's range is so wide that flushes can only be a small piece of it. I also don't think he has something really strong like top two or a set that would be tempted to spite call, because we would have heard from him sooner.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Ramping Up the Aggression

With deeper stacks (these hands are all from deep tables), you need to be, not necessarily more aggressive, but aggressive in more situations. With 100 BBs's, a 4-bet squeeze will almost always commit your stack, which means there's only a narrow range of hands with which you can make this play. Showdown equity is always important.

But as stacks get deeper, there is more room to maneuver. You can put in more bets in more spots and still have room to fold. That doesn't mean you can go crazy against just anyone. Reads are important, as you need to know that your opponents are capable of letting go of a hand and/or having a less-than-stellar hand in the first place.

In this first one, MP and CO were both very aggressive pre-flop. I was certain they'd fold often enough to make this profitable. The only x-factor was the Button. I wasn't sure what would be his standards for cold calling a 3-bet. But he was also deep, and I figured that coming in cold for the fourth bet would get him off of even some pretty strong holdings:

Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BB: $458
UTG: $400
MP: $1,303.30
CO: $1,099
BTN: $827.40
Hero (SB): $915

Pre-Flop: T 8 dealt to Hero (SB)
UTG folds, MP raises to $14, CO raises to $48, BTN calls $48, Hero raises to $210, 4 folds

Results: $162 Pot
Hero mucked T 8 and WON $162 (+$114 NET)



In this second one, the SB and I had both been aggressive, and this was the second time I'd seen the BB put in a cold 4-bet. This is definitely a riskier play to make, but for that reason I think it will also have better fold equity. BB and I have some history together, but I still think this is a tough spot for him if he holds QQ.

Full Tilt Poker, $5/$10 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: $1,033.75
Hero (MP): $3,620
CO: $2,026
BTN: $1,010
SB: $2,005
BB: $4,111

Pre-Flop: J 9 dealt to Hero (MP)
UTG folds, Hero raises to $35, 2 folds, SB raises to $125, BB raises to $350, Hero raises to $1,000, SB folds, BB calls $650

Flop: ($2,125) 3 A K (2 Players)
BB bets $700, Hero folds

Results: $2,125 Pot ($3 Rake)
BB mucked and WON $2,122 (+$1,122 NET)


While waiting for BB to act, I regretted raising quite so much. I wished I had made it 900 instead of 1000. I felt it would have put him to essentially the same decision, as I really didn't think he would ever flat call this raise. When he did, that confused me. I think he definitely would have shoved or folded AK pre-flop, and probably would have shoved in with AA and KK as well.

At the same time, this is a really bad board for him to lead out on as a bluff, and it's hard to put him on a hand that would need to bluff pre-flop. Maybe he was doing this as a probe with QQ? I don't know, it was tempting to shove in, and maybe with second pair or a gut shot or something with even a little equity against his calling range, I would have. In retrospect, floating seems like a good option, looking to bet the turn if he checks. I really don't think he could fire a second bluff if I called the flop. Meh, folding can't be that bad.

Reads didn't play as big of a role in this one, I think my hand pretty much plays itself here:

Full Tilt Poker, $3/$6 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

MP: $692.70
CO: $1,659
BTN: $1,142.25
Hero (SB): $1,725.25
BB: $691.60
UTG: $813

Pre-Flop: A K dealt to Hero (SB)
UTG raises to $21, MP calls $21, CO folds, BTN raises to $72, Hero raises to $225, 4 folds

Results: $192 Pot
Hero mucked A K and WON $192 (+$120 NET)


If the Button shoves in, it's a crappy spot, but with AK and 20% of the effective stacks in pre-flop against an aggressive opponent (I've seen him shove in some dumb spots before), I think I've got to call it off. The more important thing is that that won't happen that often, and there really isn't a better option than re-raising with AK. Flat calling and playing out of position isn't appealing, nor is folding.


That doesn't mean I'm incapable of 4-bet/folding AK pre-flop- it just depends on the opponent:

Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

Hero (SB): $800
BB: $523.30
UTG: $974.30
MP: $936.40
CO: $150.50
BTN: $1,771.40

Pre-Flop: K A dealt to Hero (SB)
2 folds, CO raises to $12, BTN raises to $44, Hero raises to $155, 2 folds, BTN raises to $1,771.40 and is All-In, Hero folds

Results: $326 Pot
BTN mucked and WON $326 (+$171 NET)


My only regret here is that if I'm going to fold, I ought to raise a little less. $125 would probably do the trick.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tony "Bond18" Dunst Final Tables WSOP $3000 NLHE

Man I was around Vegas for most of the WSOP last summer and nothing spectacular happened. Then I sit it out this summer and all of my best poker buddies start kicking ass. Guess I am a jinx.

Payouts

1 $434,789
2 $277,452
3 $167,973
4 $137,343
5 $112,641
6 $88,927
7 $69,165
8 $54,344
9 $39,523

Seats and Chip Counts

Seat 1: Sebastian Segovia (Guatemala) -- 128,500
Seat 2: Alex Bolotin (Brooklyn, New York) -- 534,000
Seat 3: David Singer (Las Vegas, Nevada) -- 334,000
Seat 4: Thuy Doan (Williamsburg, Virginia) -- 369,500
Seat 5: John Phan (Stockton, California) -- 396,500
Seat 6: Matt "Plattsburgh" Vengrin (Red Hook, New York) -- 1,007,500
Seat 7: Stewart Newman (Coral Gables, Florida) -- 398,000
Seat 8: Johnny "Schwah" Neckar (Madison, Wisconsin) -- 796,000
Seat 9: Tony "Bond18" Dunst (Melbourne, Australia) -- 333,000

There are a few other notable players here as well, including FTP pro David Singer, who recently won the $25,000 heads up tournament on that site, Thuy Doan, who posts as Shes on 2+2, Matt "Plattsburgh" Vengrin, who's been backed and ghosted to some big internet scores by the infamous JJProdigy, and Johnny Neckar, who's well-known to 2+2 MTT community as Schwah.

Play is scheduled to start in about an hour. Good luck Tony!

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, June 15, 2008

The Bad Thing About FTP's Deep Tables

is that the bad beats are more expensive than ever! Here are some monsters I lost today:

Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: $1,006.70
MP: $448.30
CO: $870.20
Hero (BTN): $1,021.50
SB: $416
BB: $525

Pre-Flop: A A dealt to Hero (BTN)

UTG calls $4, MP raises to $18, CO folds, Hero raises to $64, 2 folds, UTG calls $60, MP calls $46

Flop: ($198) 6 T A (3 Players)
UTG bets $50, MP folds, Hero calls $50

Turn: ($298) 9 (2 Players)
UTG bets $85, Hero calls $85

River: ($468) 5 (2 Players)
UTG bets $807.70 and is All-In, Hero calls $807.70

Results: $2,083.40 Pot ($3 Rake)
UTG showed 7 8 (a straight, Ten high) and WON $2,080.40 (+$1,073.70 NET)
Hero mucked A A (three of a kind, Aces) and LOST (-$1,006.70 NET)


I can't claim I played this one great. In my defense, I at least tanked before calling the river. I was hoping he had a smaller set that he thought was the nuts, since the only way I was beat was if he had led into me with a gut shot on the flop.

I was obviously really excited to pick up a set against this same guy towards the end of my session:

Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: $915.30
MP: $1,102.10
CO: $1,632
Hero (BTN): $1,104.50
SB: $414
BB: $400

Pre-Flop: 6 6 dealt to Hero (BTN)
UTG raises to $12, 2 folds, Hero calls $12, SB raises to $36, BB folds, UTG calls $24, Hero calls $24

Flop: ($112) A 2 6 (3 Players)
SB bets $76, UTG calls $76, Hero raises to $268, SB folds, UTG calls $192

Turn: ($724) K (2 Players)
UTG bets $300, Hero raises to $800.50 and is All-In, UTG calls $311.30 and is All-In

River: ($1,946.60) A (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $1,946.60 Pot ($3 Rake)
UTG showed K A (a full house, Aces full of Kings) and WON $1,943.60 (+$1,028.30 NET)
Hero showed 6 6 (a full house, Sixes full of Aces) and LOST (-$915.30 NET)


This one wasn't as bad, since it was a chop, but it was also by far the worst play on the part of my opponent. His only defense was that I had been 3betting him a ton:

Full Tilt Poker, $3/$6 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BB: $671.75
UTG: $1,220
MP: $794.20
CO: $1,171.80
Hero (BTN): $2,798.90
SB: $1,203

Pre-Flop: A K dealt to Hero (BTN)
2 folds, CO raises to $21, Hero raises to $72, 2 folds, CO raises to $225, Hero raises to $2,798.90 and is All-In, CO calls $946.80 and is All-In

Flop: ($2,352.60) J 3 T (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Turn: ($2,352.60) Q (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: ($2,352.60) K (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $2,352.60 Pot ($3 Rake)
CO showed 6 A (a straight, Ace high) and WON $1,174.80 (+$3 NET)
Hero showed A K (a straight, Ace high) and WON $1,174.80 (+$3 NET)


And if you made it this far through my whining, here's a pretty sweet steal I made:

Full Tilt Poker, $3/$6 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BTN: $2,418.45
SB: $928.25
Hero (BB): $2,250.35
UTG: $1,093.45
CO: $2,123.65

Pre-Flop: J Q dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG calls $6, CO raises to $27, BTN calls $27, SB folds, Hero raises to $125, UTG folds, CO raises to $280, BTN folds, Hero calls $155

Flop: ($596) 7 T 6 (2 Players)
Hero bets $420

Results: $596 Pot ($596 Rake)


Obviously I had pretty good reason to think my opponent's range was something wider than monsters pre-flop. My guess is that he's going to shove made hands JJ and better (though JJ no spade is maybe close), any Asx, maybe Ksx, and probably will at least call with any pair and a spade. Still, that means I'm getting him off of a ton of stuff that beats my Q high no draw. With these stacks, he really ought to have made a larger pre-flop four-bet.

The chat was kinda funny, too:

solidturismo: well
solidturismo: i dont have a spade
Foucault: me neither
solidturismo: do u?
solidturismo: are u in vegas
CauchysShorts54: he already answered
solidturismo: i hate u
solidturismo folds
solidturismo: plz what did u have?
Foucault: set of Jacks

It's pretty rare for me to type in chat during a hand, but for that reason, I think it actually looks kind of strong when I do. So occasionally I will make a comment if I think that might edge an opponent towars a fold.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Happy Father's Day

My dad keeps up with the blog, so I figured I'd make a post to wish him a Happy Father's Day. I didn't see him today, since he's in Maryland and I'm in Boston, but he'll be coming out to Las Vegas for the WSOP as he has for the last two years. After my first day (1C), we're going to Bryce Canyon for two nights before I (hopefully) play Day 2B. Happy Father's Day, dad.

On the same theme, here's a great story about being a father from 2+2 poster "Marlow":
In the months leading up the birth of my daughter, just about everyone who had the chance told me that my life was going to change. Of course they were right, but it's interesting that no one ever asserted that I was going to change. Beyond the impact my daughter has had on my sleep schedule, ability to play cards, drink, watch football, and travel - the greatest changes have all been to my personality and outlook. Before, I was a walking existential crisis. So much of my life was devoted to exploring my place in the world, and what the whole "meaning of life" is. But after she arrived, I stopped asking these questions. I'm no longer tortured by all of that. I’m satisfied. I can't say that I know definitively what the meaning of life is, but my need to ask the question of myself and the world has ceased completely.

Anyway, I have a story I'd like to share. Yesterday my daughter turned 3. In addition to the books, toys, and other presents that we've given her, we also let her choose where we ate dinner. She decided on ice cream first, then miso soup and sushi at the Japanese restaurant next door. She loves this place because not only does she love the food, but they have a small pond with dozens of koi fish in the middle of the room. She can walk right up to the pond and peer over the side to watch the fish swim up to her in the hope that they'll be fed. For a 3 year-old, this is the best. As an added bonus, she usually meets and plays with other kids who are there, too. So last night she's there looking at and talking to the fish when three older (probably 5 years old) boys came over to the pond and start to blow on the fish as they swim by. Clearly the fish did not like this. When they were blown on, they'd quickly swim off. The boys, being boys, were delighted that they were able to agitate these creatures. My daughter watched this for a minute or so, and I could almost see her thought process: "They are older, so should I do this too? The fish don't like this, though - and I like the fish. I don't know what to do." But then she made her decision for the welfare of the fish. So she marched over to these three kids who were significantly bigger than she was and started saying "don't blow on those fish!" over and over. They paid no attention, and after a few minutes, she came back to me exasperated. I suggested that she ask more politely. Of course, I knew that this would have no effect on them, but I wanted her to keep trying, to keep doing what she thought was the right thing. I didn't want to step in and teach her that justice only happens when you turn to an authority figure. I wanted her to feel as though she could do something for a cause that was important to her. To her credit, she started to ask politely. Then they started laughing and mocking her. This only spurred her on. She was getting angry, and started slapping her knees and shouting "stop, stop, stop, blowing on those fishies!!" again and again.

At this point I'm practically in tears I'm so happy. She is demonstrating empathy for the fish. She's standing up for what she believes in, even though the boys must have been very intimidating to her, and she did not resort to violence when she became frustrated. Eventually, one of the boys started clapping aggressively close to her, and I had to step in to protect her and scold him. The kid's father then materialized and ushered him away. The episode ended, but my wife and I praised her for the rest of the night.

But this was one of the most incredible experiences of my life. I was and still am bursting with pride. To me, this is what parenthood and life is all about.

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Foxwoods For the Morning

Ran down to Foxwoods for a few hours today to get back in the swing of live poker in preparation for the WSOP. Mostly I reminded myself how mind-numblingly boring the games are and how god damn stupid and annoying the players are. Jesus it's bad enough they take two and three minutes to make the most obvious folds, with all the dramatics of turning over cards and staring at each other and babbling when it's ridiculously clear they are beat, but then when hands do go to showdown all the song and dance about who's going to show his hand first starts up.

Probe Bet

Enough ranting, let's talk hands. I was sitting at a 5/10 NL must move table for most of the day. The cap in that game is $2000, and thankfully most of the table was in for the maximum or close to it. The first pot I remember playing was a squeeze against one of the more loose and aggressive guys at the table. UTG, a very loose player, limped in for $10, there was another call, the LAG raised to $30, got called, and I popped it to $175 from the CO. I don't remember what I had, but it wasn't air, probably a suited connector or something. UTG called $165 more, which would be troubling from some people but didn't mean a whole lot from this guy, and the other two called as well. This table was a riot.

Anyway, flop comes down Q95, missing me completely (I must have 64s or something). UTG checks the, LAG bets $190, next guy folds, and I start thinking. I don't believe he has a monster, certainly not QQ (he raises more pre-flop), and I doubt he leads 99 or 55. That would be a good play, but it's exactly the sort of good play that live players don't make. And he isn't so crazy as to be in the pot with 95 or Q5. This feels like a probe bet. I make it $700, and he quickly shoves. I muck, and he flashes Q9s. I don't know if this was just unlucky that he was at the top of his range or if he's never bet-folding there. But whatever, I took a stab at something creative.

Rockets

I reloaded and picked up AA the next orbit. UTG opened to $40, I made it $150 from MP, and the super loose player from before called from the SB. UTG folded, and we had a rare heads up flop. It came J96r. He checked, I bet $200, and he raises to $700. Even in a 3-bet pot, I'm not thrilled to stack off for 200BB with AA on the flop, especially when it seemed so obvious I had a big pair. But then I reminded myself that these guys love to slowplay and hate to fold overpairs, so I moved all in and got snap called by KK. That put my stack up to about $4000, with about a quarter of it being profit.

Bad Fold

Two limpers, LAG makes it $50, I find AJs and reraise to $175. A Russian who'd just sat down on my left called the reraise cold, which scared me, and the LAG called as well. Even though the flop came AKQ, I was scared by the cold call and ready to be done. We checked to the Russian, who bet $185, which is apparently all he had left (the min buyin is $500, so he must have lost a pot at some point, but I don't remember it) . The LAG called. I was getting like 5:1, but I just couldn't see myself being anything but way behind the Russian. In retrospect, my gutshot alone was almost worth the call, assuming the LAG wasn't going to blow me out of the pot before the river, so maybe I should have called. Anyway the Russian had ATo and God knows what the other monkey had but he mucked and I shook my head in disgust, at them at at myself.

Lucky You Missed

Last hand I played before lunch, I limped behind a few limpers with JT and got an Ah Jx Th flop. That was good but not great, because these guys do limp stuff like KQ, AT, and AJ. They checked to me, I bet $50 into a $70 pot, and got two calls. The turn was a lovely T, giving me a very likely best hand, though not one that could expect to get paid off by a lot of worse ones. I bet $150, and they both called me again. The river was an offsuit 3, I bet $500, and they both folded. The Russian told me how he had "straight drool and floosh drool" and that I was very lucky he missed them both. I just smiled.

Just Flip Them For Chrissake

It was about time for lunch, but I nearly lost my appetite when two of these nimrods got into an especially bad showdown scuffle. The action went check check on a 357TQ river, and they both stare at each other for like twenty seconds. The second player says, "Queens."

The first player says, "Pair." There is more staring.

"Can you beat a Queen?"

"I got a pair."

"Does it beat a Queen?"

"Show me a Queen."

Finally, the LAG shouted, "Somebody turn over a fucking hand!" and the second guy, who had droopy walrus jowls and a matching mustache, flashed Q8. The other guy mucked. "Jesus, we're playing time here."

Then the walrus started whining about how the other guy started it and he was supposed to show first, which is true by the book but if the other guy is saying a Q is good then Walrus should just show a Q and then if the first guy is lying he will be the one to face ostracism for slowrolling. Anyway, I went for a sandwich.

Main Game

Half an hour later, I was just reclaiming my seat when the floor lady told me I was getting moved in the main game. Immediately the oldest guy at the table hopped out of his chair and started shouting about how he was here longer and should be the one to move. He was wrong, but our table was pretty soft and I had no desire to move, so I said he could go. The floor wouldn't have it, though, and he got all upset then realized he was wrong and sat down. I don't think he even knew why he wanted to move, because our game was clearly better than the other one. He was just being a stickler for the sake of being a stickler, because that's what old nits do.

The main game was looser but somehow tougher. I'm not sure how to explain, I think there was just a little more aggression and slightly better hand reading that made it tough to win a pot without showdown. Granted, making a hand could still win a big pot.

Squeeze Plays

I was getting nothing and folding for like an hour, then decided I needed to capitalize on that image, so at some point I squeezed a $60 raise and call to $300 with QJo and took it down. Two orbits (and like an hour) later, the same two players were in for $60, and I found AQs in the SB. I made it $300, the straddle called cold with like $900 beyond, and the second caller said "so tempting", hemmed and hawed, and finally called.

The flop was awful, something like 972 with just one of my suit. I guess I was still giving cold callers too much credit, because I didn't feel like I could fire into people on this flop given that the straddle really ought to have an overpair and with just a pot-sized bet left in this stack, I couldn't see him folding TT. So we check it around, and the turn is a 7, and we check it around, and the river is a 3, and we check it to the last guy, and he bets $600, and we both fold. He flashes J8s, and the straddle whines about folding a pocker pair. There's no way he folded an overpair, so he must have called with like 66 or some shit and ruined the hand for me.

Well Played Sir

At this table I was sandwiched between a regular on my left, who was probably one of the better guys at the table but had been playing for 20 hours, and a wormy-looking Asian guy on my right who I think people were calling Scott. The guy on my left raised pre-flop, and there were like three callers, including the Worm, and I called. Flop 56T, checks to the raiser, he bets $400, Worm calls from the SB, I fold. They both check an A on the turn, then the Worm bets $1200.

"Ugggggggh," groans the raiser. "Yah really puttin' the screws ta me, fockin' Scott." He proceeds to agonize for literally five minutes and finally makes the call. Half the table tells him it's a good call before any cards are revealed. "I got QQ."

The Worm sighs and nods. "Is good," he mutters.

"What? It's good?" He starts to crack a smile and flips his ladies.

The Worm shakes his head and holds his cards as though he's about to muck them. The other guy's buddies are congratulating him on the call. "I got set," the Worm declares quietly, flipping a pair of 6's.

The table goes ballistic on him, the guy on my left is all red in the face and cursing, this old Greek guy is telling the Worm what a terrible thing he has done, etc. The Worm just smiles to himself and stacks his chips. It was a scummy thing to do, but on the other hand the guy was wasting so much time with his drama queen antics, and I have to admit that it was a beautifully executed slowroll in a $4000 pot.

Good Bet

Getting bored, I took a flop for $50 in an eight-way pot with 76o on the button. The flop was a pretty favorable 983r, and since everyone checked to me, I bet $250. I got two calls, including the old Greek, and prayed for a 5 on the turn. It was a Q, and the Greek shoved a towering stack of green chips, like $2000, into the pot. I think he probably had 98, Q9, or a set, and for some reason didn't want to checkraise. God I wish a 5 had turned.

The very next hand I took a five-way flop for $60 with 54s on the CO and flopped a flush. This time a $250 bet took it down.

Wormy Business

The Worm pulled another scumbag move when he made a bit when he makes a big bet after a third club hits on the river. His opponent calls and everyone waits for him to table his hand. He stares at his opponent for a minute, then slowly turns over the Jc. After some more staring, he flips 7s. Thanks for wasting our time with your retarded antics. As if the table didn't hate you enough already.

Get on With It!

Then a few hands later I limped 77 UTG and the other time waster raised to $85. He got two calls, then I called. The flop came 246, I checked, he bet $200, the SB raised to $500, and I quickly tossed my weak overpair. I'm confident that anyone else at the table would have agonized for two minutes before folding, and a few of them may have called. The turn was a T, and the SB shoved for a little over pot. Once again, the drama begins. "Should I call? What do you have? Do you have a set?"

Of course he does, dipshit. Just fold your Aces and let's get this show on this road. "I know you could play QQ or KK like this. I know it." He flipped his AA and stared at the SB. I don't know what he was looking for, because the SB was grinning like an idiot but he talked himself into a call anyway and of course lost to a set of 4's. He went on to bemoan his luck and how all his big pairs were getting cracked. I felt for him a little bit, but of course his ridiculous payoffs were compounding the problem.

Everyone was saying he had to pay off with AA because no one can put him on it because he raises so much, but actually it was blatantly obvious because usually he raises to $50 or $60 and when he made it $85 UTG+1 then bet into three people on the flop it was very clear he had a monster.

Top Two Not So Good?

Finally, I won one more moderately sized pot by raising from EP in a pot where like three people had posted. I opened for $80 with KT, and naturally the posters had $10 in the pot already, so they were all priced in to see the flop, and so were the blinds. It was KT7, and a $300 bet took it down. Strangely, even though I had KT, I'm not sure I could stand a raise. The thing is that my hand looks so much like AA or AK that I don't think I'm getting raised by KQ, and these guys never play draws fast, and I don't think they're playing T7. But I took it down, so it's all good.

I was up $1185 on the day, but I was bored and pissed out of my mind for most of the day, so it was barely worth it. Actually compared to just playing online it definitely wasn't worth it. Hopefully you all appreciate the shit I go through to bring you these moderately amusing tales.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, June 13, 2008

Debate Updates

As some of you know, my poker playing for the last few years has supported not only myself but a debate league in the Boston Public Schools. It started as just a volunteer thing that I did with a few teachers, but we soon realized that it had potential to help a lot of students if we could make it better. The key to that has been getting the administration of BPS to take some ownership of it, so that it would become part of the school system and not just an outside program.

I'm very excited that after months of meetings, the superintendent and her staff have agreed to invest $50,000 in the League. This is actually less than I was hoping, but it's still a huge improvement from nothing and will hopefully get us a foot in the door. Everyone I've met in the administration has seemed genuinely taken with the program. Now we'll have access to data such as debaters' GPA and test scores (this will be part of our deal with BPS), the numbers will back up our claims about how participation in debate can improve confidence, academic achievement, critical thinking, literacy, etc. It seems very plausible to me that there could be debate teams in every high school in the city, and maybe middle schools as well, within ten years.

It's kind of sad that I'll probably be leaving Boston just as this thing really takes off. I'll still be involved as a member of the Board, but we're hiring a full time person to direct the League.

This afternoon, I attended an end-of-the-year banquet and awards ceremony for one of my debate teams. In addition to awards for all the debaters, they had one for me in honor of my last year as director. Though it was technically from the whole team, I know that the coach and one student in particular were behind it. These two are respectively among the most extraordinary of the dozens of teachers and hundreds of students I've worked with in my seven years in the urban debate field, and their respect means the world to me.

Here's the trophy, which I'm sure will become one of my most cherished possessions:


Actually the aforementioned student just found this blog recently. When she saw me today, the first thing she said was, "Hey I googled your name."

Uh oh, I know where this is going. "Yeah?"

"I didn't know about all that poker stuff."

"Yeah I don't really make a big deal about it at work."

"That's pretty neat. So you are like a beginner?"

"Uh, I didn't say that. Where'd you get that from?"

"Some article from the Baltimore Sun said it was like your second time or you made money for the second time or something."

"Yeah, my second time making money... at the world championships."

"Oh. That's pretty good."

And a close-up of the engraving:

Labels: , ,

Awesome Poker Ad

I've never even heard of this magazine, but their ad is clever and pretty funny. It took me a minute to get it. If you can't read it, the text at the bottom says, "Become the King of Bluff."


Labels: ,

I Finally Ran a Brunson on Someone!

Doyle Brunson's Super/System was the first poker book I ever read, and one part that has always stuck out in my mind is a play that he suggests to bluff an opponent off of a chop when you both a one-card straight. Essentially, he suggests that if your opponent makes a bet or raise and you are sure he has the straight, and you also have it, you can just call (Brunson suggests some drama but it's hard to do that online) and then try to represent a full house if the board pairs on the river. You've got nothing to lose, since even if he calls you still chop the pot.

Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 4 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

SB: $784.80
Hero (BB): $800
UTG: $1,563.55
BTN: $824

Pre-Flop: 5 A dealt to Hero (BB)
2 folds, SB raises to $14, Hero calls $10

Flop: ($28) K Q T (2 Players)
SB checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($28) J (2 Players)
SB bets $24, Hero calls $24

River: ($76) K (2 Players)
SB bets $50, Hero raises to $262, SB folds

Results: $176 Pot ($2 Rake)
Hero mucked 5 A and WON $174 (+$86 NET)


Obviously this isn't exactly the same situation. With my redraw, I would have a lot to gain by getting it in against a straight on the turn, but at that time I wasn't sure he had a straight. Even on the river, I can't be sure, but I am glad I got the chance to make this play. He tanked for a while before folding, so I really do think I got him off the straight.

One important thing to point out here is that I was nearly certain he didn't have a boat. I didn't think he would check two pair or a set on the flop, and if the J gave him two pair or a set, I don't think he would bet that when there was a four-straight on the board. So I wasn't worried about having him shove over this raise.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Two Misclicks

When you play a lot of tables at once, one thing you need to factor into the decision is that you will occasionally make mistakes. And I don't just mean poker mistakes like missing a value bet, I mean actually "Oh crap I clicked call and meant to click fold" mistakes. It's really pretty ridiculous to think what a mistaken click can cost you, but it's better not think about it that way. Misclicks are just a cost of doing business.

Honestly, I don't make them that often, but in the past week I have had two comical ones. The first was especially cool because I called so quickly on the end. It must have tilted the hell out of the other guy:

Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $10 BB (9 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

MP3 ($866)
CO ($1168.75)
Button ($985)
SB ($481.50)
BB ($1540.50)
UTG ($247.25)
UTG+1 ($1000)
MP1 ($528.25)
Hero ($1047)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with As, Kd.
3 folds, Hero raises to $35, 3 folds, SB calls $30, 1 fold.

Flop: ($80) 7h, 7c, 5d (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($80) 6h (2 players)
SB bets $27, Hero raises to $62, SB calls $35.

River: ($204) 3c (2 players)
SB bets $101, Hero calls $101.

Final Pot: $406

Results in white below:

SB has Tc Jh (one pair, sevens).

Hero has As Kd (one pair, sevens).

Outcome: Hero wins $406.


This one I guess is funny if you aren't me. Once again I snap-called the river, this time with the nut low:

Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

Hero ($1182.50)
SB ($864.90)
BB ($329.70)
UTG ($959.60)
MP ($890)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 4h, 3d.
2 folds, Hero raises to $14, SB calls $12, 1 fold.

Flop: ($32) Qs, 2h, Jd (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($32) 5c (2 players)
SB bets $20, Hero raises to $92, SB raises to $220, Hero calls $128.

River: ($472) 5s (2 players)
SB bets $308, Hero calls $308.

Final Pot: $1088

He had a set of deuces.

Labels: ,

What's in a Name?

I was playing a bit lower than usual tonight, as I'm wont to do when on a downswing, and that means that I was up against a lot of players I'd never seen before. When trying to get a read on unknowns at a 6-max table, there are some really basic questions I am looking to answer about their level of knowledge and the plays in their arsenal. I'm thinking of stuff like the following:

1. Does he 3-bet light out of the blinds?

2. Does he 3-bet his button aggressively (especially important to know at Deep tables)

3. Is he capable of making a light 4-bet?

4. Does he know what a squeeze play is? Does he make squeeze plays? Does he play back at squeeze plays?

5. Can he fire multiple barrels?

6. Does he check-raise bluff dry flops?

7. Does he isolate limers

Usually, it takes some substantial observation to figure this stuff out. But sometimes players are nice enough to choose screennames that make their level of knowledge very clear. This is just giving away free information and helping me play better against them. For instance, here's a hand I played against "MyNameisBusto".

For those who don't know, "busto" is slang for a poker player who has lost his bankroll. It's very likely that a player who chooses a name like this is a serious player, quite possibly a professional. Moreover, the fact that he chose to take his screenname from popular poker culture suggests that he's somewhat immersed in this culture, probably as an active participant on 2+2 or another big poker forum. Thus, I'm going to expect him to be up on popular plays like the squeeze play, the continuation bet, and the CiB:


Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

UTG ($1721.30)
Hero ($951.30)
Button ($798)
SB ($847)
BB ($269.60)

Preflop: Hero is MP with Ac, 7c.
UTG raises to $14, Hero calls $14, 1 fold, SB raises to $72, 1 fold, UTG folds, Hero calls $58.

Flop: ($162) 6c, 6s, 4c (2 players)
SB bets $100, Hero raises to $279, SB raises to $458, Hero raises to $879.3 (All-In), SB folds.

Final Pot: $1499.30


I would usually throw this away pre-flop against an unknown, but since I figured this guy's range could be quite wide, and we were deep, I planned to take it away post-flop. Then I get a sweet flop, and I nearly made a pot-committing raise on the flop, but then I thought, "Let's see if I can get this guy to make another crazy play." Sure enough, he clicked it back, then folded getting a gazillion to one, allowing me to win a huge pot with no showdown.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Sticky Sunday

Ugh I can't even tell you how gross the weather is in Boston right now. It is so humid, and my window fan is doing nothing. I really was in no mood to play poker today, and I think it showed. Here's my bustout hand from the FTP 750K:

Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 250/500 Blinds, 50 Ante, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BB: 7,107
UTG: 6,306
UTG+1: 9,197
UTG+2: 26,034
MP1: 18,533
MP2: 5,256
CO: 9,424
Hero (BTN): 17,312
SB: 22,581

Pre-Flop: (1,200) K T dealt to Hero (BTN)
3 folds, MP1 raises to 1,375, 2 folds, Hero raises to 3,262, 2 folds, MP1 calls 1,887

Flop: (7,724) 9 Q 2 (2 Players)
MP1 checks, Hero checks

Turn: (7,724) 6 (2 Players)
MP1 checks, Hero checks

River: (7,724) T (2 Players)
MP1 bets 15,221 and is All-In, Hero calls 14,000 and is All-In

Results: 35,724 Pot
MP1 showed J K (a straight, King high) and WON 35,724 (+18,412 NET)
Hero mucked K T (a pair of Tens) and LOST (-17,312 NET)


I don't want to post my reasoning for the call yet, because I'm curious whether you all think it was ridiculous. I was really, really torn, but I wonder if I was just overthinking it. I started a thread on 2+2 as well.

Labels: , , , , ,

Stop and Go

Before Greg Raymer was a World Series of Poker champion, he was 2+2 Forums poster Fossilman8. And even before his 2004 main event victory proved it to the world, his status as a world-class poker player and theorist was well-known to the 2+2 community. One of his most famous contributions to the game was the stop-and-go play, which has since appeared in such publications as David Sklansky and Ed Miller's No Limit Hold 'Em: Theory and Practice.

The idea is to pick up a little extra fold equity in a situation where you were going to move all in pre-flop by instead calling and then moving all in on any flop. If you're pretty sure you were going to get called pre-flop anyway, then you don't have much to lose.

The potential drawback is that you might give your opponent a chance to make a correct post-flop fold. For instance, if you have AK and your opponent folds AQ on the flop but would have called pre-flop, that's bad for you. And it usually looks like such an improbable line that you don't get a lot of fold equity anyway. After all, if you actually called pre-flop on a short stack and flopped top pair, wouldn't you usually check?

For these reasons, the stop and go isn't a play that I employ very often. I did find a useful spot for it recently, though:

Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 140/280 Blinds, 25 Ante, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG+1: 6,650
UTG+2: 2,660
MP1: 6,510
MP2: 6,105
CO: 6,620
BTN: 4,389
SB: 2,705
Hero (BB): 3,460
UTG: 6,155

Pre-Flop: (645) 7 7 dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to 800, 6 folds, Hero calls 520

Flop: (1,965) J A 3 (2 Players)
Hero bets 2,635 and is All-In, UTG+1 folds

Results: 1,965 Pot
Hero mucked 7 7 and WON 1,965 (+1,140 NET)


As you can see, I've only got about 12 BB left in my stack. With such a big chunk of my stack in the pot and a decent pocket pair, I don't think I can fold, even to an early position raise. But with a stop and go, my flop shove is big enough that it won't be a trivial call if my opponent makes like an underpair or misses with AK or something.

This looks like a bad flop, but this hand actually illustrates another important point about the stop and go, which is that once you decide to execute, it's generally correct to grit your teeth and shove even if the flop looks bad for you. I don't think my opponent folded an Ace, but I have gotten him off of 88 or KQ because I followed through on my plan.

Labels: , , , ,