Friday, July 3, 2009

The Blog, It Is A-Changin'


My girlfriend's been working tremendously hard on a redesign of the Thinking Poker blog/website, and it's going to be going live tomorrow. By the time many of you read this post, it may be live already, in which case, don't panic- you're still in the right place!

If you happen to read this before the changeover, know that there could be some downtime/technical difficulty as we transition from Blogger to Wordpress. Hopefully there won't be any, but in any event, it will be well worth it. The new site design is amazing and about 1000 times better than this crap you've been looking at for the past 6 months.

Oh, and I'm playing the main event tomorrow, so remember to follow me at http://twitter.com/thinkingpoker. I'll keep you posted on my steadily rising chip count and all of the hopeless triple barrels I'm too disciplined to attempt. Positive thinking!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Imperial Palace Elevator Conversation

For some reason, people in Vegas talk to strangers on the elevator, which is a total 180 from common elevator behavior anywhere else in the world. I think it has something to do with the general mood of the place combined with how crowded the elevators often are.

Usually it's just some lame joke about the crowds or something, but today, while I was waiting for the elevator at the luxurious Imperial Palace when a skinny man who looked to be in his early fifties walked over and pressed the button as well. "Mmm mmm mmm," he groaned, shaking his head at me in frustration.

There are about a million reasons why someone might be feeling that way in Vegas, so I just pursed my lips and snorted sympathetically.

"This my last trip with that woman," he told me. "We get home, I'm gettin' a divorce."

"Sorry to hear that."

"Mmm hmmm. She outta her goddamn mind. I mean she seriously crazy."

"Vegas can bring out the worst in people."

"Naw, man, this been goin' on. 53 years old and she a muthafuckin' streetwalkin' whore."

I sighed along with him as we boarded the elevator, then asked which floor he was going to. He told me, and I pressed the buttons for both of us.

"Up till now, you know, it was workin' out alright for me, but I can't take this shit no more. She is muthafuckin' nuts."

"A lot of them are."

He smiled a bit and laughed for the first time. "You got right, man."

My stop was first. "Best of luck to you," I told him.

"Alright, alright, I appreciate that. You too now," he answered as the doors closed behind me.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 26, 2009

Imperial Palace, Here I Come!

So apparently Vegas isn't quite as dead as I thought and waiting until the day before my arrival to make hotel arrangements was not wise. The Rio is booked solid until Tuesday, so I'm spending my first three nights at the good old Imperial Palace. I stayed there last year, and honestly, I expected worse. Hopefully I didn't just get an abnormally non-crappy room.

Quick little Twitter update/clarification (sorry I am just learning how to use this): you don't actually have to have a Twitter account to get updates. Just go to http://twitter.com/thinkingpoker and you can you see my most recent Tweets.

I'll be using that for occasional chip count updates and reports on important hands, but I'll still try to post more substantive stuff on the blog as time permits. It shouldn't be a problem through the first few days of the main event, but should I make it to Day 3, I'll have a lot less free time from then on out.

Wish me luck!

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Olen julkkis Suomessa!

That's right! My thousands of Finnish readers will be thrilled to learn that select articles from my archive will now be available in Finnish at Pokerisvut. Currently appearing: Tuottoisia virheitä (Profitable Mistakes).

I don't speak a word of Finnish, but I'm enjoying looking at Pokerisvut's news sidebar nonetheless. Between cognates and proper names, it's not too difficult to figure out what's going on. To wit: Dan "Wretchy" Martin sai porttikiellot multiaccountingin takia.

This, by the way, is the project that I referenced back in my April post that would be of interest to very few if any readers. If you happen to be of the German persuasion, you can read select articles in your native language at PokerOlymp.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

April

I won and lost a lot of money in April. I finished the month with a decent though not spectacular bottom line, but given what I spent on tournament buy-ins (thank you very much, SCOOP), I'm impressed that I was up at all.

Resolution One: Keep Grinding NLHE Cash Games


Goal 1: Earn $X in NLHE Cash Games

Getting very close (to being on track, that is). If I can maintain this rate for the rest of the year, I'll be happy. And if I manage a respectable tournament score to boot....

Goal 2: Earn Supernova status on PokerStars

I'm well on track now. The SCOOP was worth a lot of VPPs, so I'm glad I grinded up to Platinum last month. Were I to hit Supernova in the next two months, which I won't, I'd be eligible for a free suite upgrade at the Palms during my WSOP trip.

Then again, this goal is going to a breeze now that Stars is offering 100,000 VPPs to their satellite qualifiers who actually play in the WSOP main event. Now I all have to do is win one of their damn satellites.

Resolution Two: Diversify My Income Streams

Goal 3: Monetize This Blog

Baby steps. In case you missed them this month, I wrote a review of Deke Castleman's Whale Hunt in the Desert and pimped some ways to get your The Wire fix. If I ever get my act properly together, I may have a few advertisers soon.

Goal 4: Get Back Into Coaching

As of last night, I'm more than halfway through my first group session. I'm very happy with how it's going, but that's got a lot to do with the individual students who comprise the group. With a well-chosen group, though, I think this model has great potential to provide affordable coaching for smaller stakes players while still getting me fair compensation for my time.

Goal 5: Market My Writing

There's a fun little development here that's a 99% done deal, but I'll wait to announce it until I know for sure. Be warned, though, that it's only going to be genuinely useful to a very small fraction of my readers. I think it's cool though.

In the meantime, check out my interview with Part Time Poker.

Resolution Three: Improve My NLHE Skills

Goal 6: Use Poker Tracker More Effectively

I played with a HUD up over the weekend for the first time in weeks, but I just didn't find myself using it much at all. Of course, as soon as I turned it off, a spot came up where I did actually want to see some numbers. All in all, though, it still feels like more of a distraction when I'm multi-tabling. I do want to at least use Poker Tracker for more self-analysis of my game.

Goal 7: Finish the Year with a 4BB/100 Win-Rate at 5/10 NL.

I'm currently at a not-too-impressive 1.32 BB/100 over 86,065 hands. The best way to get this up will probably be to play more 5/10 Heads Up, where I'm currently scoring better than 10 BB/100 over 10K hands.

Goal 8: Play 50,000 Hands of Heads Up NLHE

I've logged just under 20K hands so far, at a 4.11 BB/100 win rate. No wonder it's getting tougher and tougher to find action. Also of note: I'm currently working on a Heads Up series for Poker Savvy Plus.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Part Time Poker Interview

Part Time Poker just published a short interview with yours truly. I've generally shied away from doing a lot of self-promotion, but this was a fun and original set of questions. They also persuaded me with liberal doses of flattery:

When you talk about approaches to poker, there are two extremes. At one end you’ll find players who are guided almost entirely by instinct and don’t spend a lot of time articulating their processes. At the other end you’ll find players like Andrew ‘Foucault’ Brokos, who spend so much time articulating their process that one wonders - when do they actually find time to play? All kidding aside, Brokos is an excellent player with a focus on mid stakes no limit cash and some interesting insights into what it takes to make both a good poker player and industry alike.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

March came in like a lion but went out like a lamb. I was within a few hundred dollars of even, then dropped 10K on the Bay 101 WPT. I don't regret it, though. It was a fun experience (the tournament itself, and the vacation) and, based on the people I played with, a good value. That's what bankrolls are for. Not that I'm anywhere near rolled for a 10K tournament, but I am overrolled for the 5/10 and 10/20 games that I consider my "regular games", so I can afford the occasional shot.

The vacation did me some good. After more than a week of no poker, probably the longest I've gone since I started playing seriously, I really buckled down and put some hours in. I played a few more tables than usual, maintained a pretty solid game, and got myself pretty well into the black by the end of the month. Of course, with the Spring Championship of Online Poker starting tomorrow, that profit could all be gone by mid-April....

Resolution One: Keep Grinding NLHE Cash Games


Goal 1: Earn $X in NLHE Cash Games

I'm still not on track to hit this goal, but even if I continue at my current rate, I'll pull down a respectable income by the end of the year.

Goal 2: Earn Supernova status on PokerStars

On track, by the skin of my teeth. On March 30th, Stars notified me that I hadn't earned enough FPP's to maintain my Gold Star status, largely because of my vacation. I opened a bunch of 2/4 full ring games and $50 and $100 sit-and-goes to grind FPP's, and by the end of the night, I was within range of the 7500 FPPs I needed to get Platinum Star. Since I'm going to be playing a lot of SCOOP tournaments this month, I figured that would probably be worth getting, so I put in two more grind sessions yesterday to pick up Platinum at, literally, the 11th hour.

On the one hand, I feel a little like a tool for giving in to this little marketing ploy. Then again, it was a good incentive for me to put in hours, and it made me more money than it made Poker Stars, so I guess the real victims were my opponents!

I've got just over 25,000 FPPs now, and I'll need 100,000 by year's end to reach Supernova. Now that I see how many FPPs I can earn in a brief period if I set my mind to it, I'm once again confident that I can get this done.

Resolution Two: Diversify My Income Streams

Goal 3: Monetize This Blog

I really need to get around to this. I can't believe I haven't posted any book reviews this year. I've got one nearly ready to go, and there are a few others I've been wanting to read.

Goal 4: Get Back Into Coaching

To those of you who've spoken to me about group rates: I'm looking to launch something for the second half of April, after the SCOOP.

Goal 5: Market My Writing

Same old, same old.

Resolution Three: Improve My NLHE Skills

Goal 6: Use Poker Tracker More Effectively

Nothing new to report.

Goal 7: Finish the Year with a 4BB/100 Win-Rate at 5/10 NL.

I'm actually having a problem with my database right now, so I'm not able to look this up. I think though that I'm barely above 0, even though I've made a decent amount of money. Just a matter of doing better in bigger games than small ones.

Goal 8: Play 50,000 Hands of Heads Up NLHE

Again, I don't have the exact number offhand. I will say though that I was wrong when I reported 78,000 hands from last month. My goal is still 50,000 for the year, and I think I'm 30-40% of the way there. It's actually quite difficult to get action. Most of the regulars who sit alone at six tables at once won'i play me, and the ones who will are mostly guys I don't want to play. Even Poker Stars sponsored player Vanessa "Lady Maverick" Rousso quit me the other day after I stacked her, telling me that she thought she could find a better spot.

Aaaaand the annual graph, which is getting swingier by the month:

Labels: ,

Monday, March 23, 2009

Santa Cruz

Awesome town! I had this preconception of a kind of shallow California surfer dude town, but I actually found a surprisingly friendly, welcoming, and charming place with a strong sense of community and civic identity (as a California surfer dude town, granted), at least among the locals. I'm sure the place can get pretty crowded and insufferable on weekends, especially on summer weekends. But there was a great diversity of restaurants and independent shops collected in a few very walkable downtown blocks. Plus, it's just minutes from the beach and a boardwalk that features a well-regarded roller coaster, at least according to my brother the ex-coaster fanatic. Sadly, the coaster was only running on weekends, so I didn't get to ride it.

I did, however, get to camp in a nearby state park and spend the afternoon on a beautiful beach. On the east coast, at least the mid-Atlantic region where I grew up, we don't have cliffs and trees right along the shore. It was pretty neat to hang out on a beach with a tree-lined, rocky cliff towering overhead.

A short walk along the beach revealed that someone had built an incredible shrine of sorts in the shadow of one of the higher cliffs out of driftwood, stones, and local plants. There was an elaborate "courtyard", entryway, and "altar" that must have taken says of solid work, but no artist in sight. I took some pictures, but I'm not sure how well the scale and detail of the place comes across:

The next morning we hung out for a bit at a local coffee shop to take advantage of their free internet and overheard some aging, bearded conspiracy theorists sharing their crazy with some young California surfer dudes and two bohemian intellectuals who seemed to be Mexican. There was a lot of discussion about a car that can run on compressed air that the US government is keeping a secret. It was pretty classic.

Oh, and someone in a burrito joint recognized my Foucault T-shirt and asked where I got it! (Answer: Tres Normale)

Sorry for the long silence, but I've been camping with limited internet access and just generally had better stuff to do here in California besides blogging. But whenever I get around to posting next (quite possibly tomorrow), I'll talk about Big Sur.

Labels: ,

Monday, March 16, 2009

World Poker Tour Bay 101

I've been alternately promising Emily a vacation and insisting that I haven't had enough time for poker for months now. Finally, she offered the very appealing suggestion that we go to Northern California for the World Poker Tour event at the Bay 101 casino in San Jose. We've tacked on a few days to the end of the trip so that there'll be vacationing no matter how the tournament goes, but having a few extra days in the Bay area isn't a bad consolation prize if I don't last long in the tournament.

We flew into Oakland Saturday night and had a minor adventure at the airport. Our hotel offered a free shuttle, but the Colgate Women's Lacrosse team was already waiting for the shuttle when we got to the depot. It looked like the driver was going to need at least three trips to get all of them, and rather than waiting half an hour, we went to find a cab stand.

Along the way, a woman who seemed like a helpful airline employee (suspicious combination, I know, but in my defense I was tired) told us we could take a commercial shuttle for "about $5 each". We waited a few minutes for the shuttle to arrive, and then a driver with a thick Indian accent started to pick up our bags and ask where we were going. He had clearly never heard of our hotel, which was practically walking distance from the airport, and started his price negotiation at $20.

When I informed we were told $10, he grew irate, first at us, then at the woman who, it turned out, worked for the shuttle company and was aggressively recruiting customers at the airport. As best we could tell, she'd roped us in then called for a shuttle, but the driver didn't consider it worth his time to come out to the airport for a $10 job and was angry at her for calling him. We slunk away as the man berated her, and she shouted a meak apology and directions to the cab stand at our backs.

Yesterday we drove from Oakland to San Jose, stopping in a park to hike through a Redwood canyon. They weren't the colossal redwoods that are so famous, but they were still pretty big, and we saw some turkey-sized birds, so it was all good, though more than a little muddy. I'd upload some pictures, but this hotel internet connection is blazingly slow.

We stopped for lunch at a Chicago-style pizzeria called Zachary's just outside of Berkeley. Having lived in Chicago for four years, I can say that it wasn't a particularly authentic recreation, but it was quite good in its own right and came with one of the best mixed greens salads I've ever had.

Play starts in less than two hours, and I'm looking forward to starting the day with a big breakfast, so I better go. Wish me luck, and check back tonight for an update!

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Α Δ Φ vs. Westboro Baptist Church

I noticed this video on The Stranger Blog this afternoon. I must say that as a University of Chicago undergraduate, I had a haughty disdain for the Alpha Delts. In my defense, their president did get our twice-weekly campus poker tournament shut down so that his frat could host the game and sell drinks. But this is pretty cool.

Edit: In case it's not clear what's going on here, some religious bigots staged a demonstration across the street from the frat house. I'm not sure why they chose that location, and I don't think it was because of the frat (it's not like a gay frat or something), but the frat boys responded with an impromptu gay dance party on their balcony.

Labels:

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

February felt like (and was) a pretty awful month, but I did actually win some money. Just not nearly enough to make up for January. After the first week, I was in black and then some, pretty much right where I wanted to be for the month. Then it was back to bad beats and cold decks. I'll refrain from posting any whine hands here, though, and get on to evaluating progress towards my yearly goals.

Resolution One: Keep Grinding NLHE Cash Games


Goal 1: Earn $X in NLHE Cash Games

Still on track to be busto by the end of the year....

Goal 2: Earn Supernova status on PokerStars

I earned 8866 VPPs in February, which keeps me on track to make Supernova in November. Truthfully, I'm just not digging the games on Stars. Maybe I'm just more accustomed to the FTP interface, but I also like the deep stack games, the Bet Pot button, and the way the tables tile to fit whichever screen I have them on.

Resolution Two: Diversify My Income Streams

Goal 3: Monetize This Blog

I need to get on this...

Goal 4: Get Back Into Coaching

Progress is slow but steady. I've had some conversations with former students about how to structure group sessions, and I may get a trial session off the ground soon.

Goal 5: Market My Writing

Same old, same old.

Resolution Three: Improve My NLHE Skills

Goal 6: Use Poker Tracker More Effectively

Still haven't done much. The Poker Savvy Plus community has been helpful in finding some stats I wanted that weren't available in the commercial product, so I guess I've got the tools I need now. This probably ought to be a priority- analyzing one's game is a good thing to do during a downswing.

Goal 7: Finish the Year with a 4BB/100 Win-Rate at 5/10 NL.

Got it up to -.19 BB/100, which is a big improvement from January's -5.

Goal 8: Play 50,000 Hands of Heads Up NLHE

This is the one place where I did make substantial progress, for all the good it did me. In fact, I kind of underestimated how simple this goal was: I've already played 78,474 hands. They go quick when theres' only two of you. I hereby revise this goal:
Play 300,000 Hands of Heads Up NLHE

Aaaaaand my swingy graph:

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, February 26, 2009

UB Giving Back

This afternoon I got an e-mail from Ultimate Bet reminding me that I still have a $.26 in my account and suggesting some things I could do with it, like a $.02 tournament. They only let you cash out whole dollar amounts, so when I cleared my account, I had to leave the change.

Don't worry, I'm not about to give them another chance. However, their e-mail also reminded me that I had 67,000 unused UltimatePoints, which are their frequent player reward. Turns out that was enough to get a Nintendo Wii and a Nunchuk controller, so that should be on its way.

That was a fun little surprise, since I pretty much never buy any kind of consumer goods except for the occasional CD or book. After taking so much (actually, to my knowledge UB didn't actually steal anything from me), it's nice to see UB giving back!

Labels: ,

Monday, February 16, 2009

FTOPS #22: $5000 NLHE Two-Day

I really wish FTP had found a way to avoid scheduling this on Valentine's Day. Emily told me she was OK with me playing it, which I think she would have been, but that's really all the more reason to spend the day with her. And obviously the latter is far more fun and less stressful/frustrating than buying a super-expensive lottery ticket. Long story short, I didn't play.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Boston Debate in the Boston Globe

The Boston Debate League's Fifth Annual City Championships took place over the weekend, and it was a great event. Nearly sixty students competed, which is actually a little low compared to the numbers we've had recently, but their enthusiasm more than made up for it. In the Varsity division, the reigning City Champions narrowly defended their title against a very promising upstart team. Meanwhile, a young school found a much-needed morale boost by closing out the JV division (that is to say, they won first and second place).

The BDL also got its first mention, and a fairly substantial one at that, in the Boston Globe, the city's most prominent daily paper. The reporter did a nice job speaking with a variety of students, coaches, and administrators, and ultimately presented two of our most important themes: that debate is a rigorous academic activity that students nonetheless enjoy, and that it attracts all types of students, not only those who are already high achievers.

The credit for this goes to my girlfriend, who diligently reached out to nearly one hundred contacts at a wide variety of news outlets. Thanks, Em!

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 30, 2009

Tales From a 7-11: Shantel

Shantel was a middle-aged black woman who for some reason developed a sort of matronly affection for me. She always told me that I was her favorite person to work with, but I don't know why and the feeling wasn't mutual. I didn't dislike her, but she was a lot less fun than the employees who were closer to me in age and/or maturity (most of the middle-aged men who worked there were just overgrown teenagers). Frankly she kind of gave me the creeps.

There was a huge ice machine in the back room that occasionally spat out batches of frozen cubes into a giant vat. Once per shift, every employee was supposed to shovel the ice into plastic bags, tie them off, and wheel them up into the front to stack them in a display cooler. It was one of the most hated tasks in the store because it was boring, repetitive, and relatively hard physical labor. Usually you needed to hack at the ice with the metal scoop because it all got frozen together, then you had to spoon heavy scoops of the stuff into a bag whose opening was barely larger than the scoop itself. After a few bags, your fingers would be too stiff with cold to tie a good knot, so from time to time a big would spill and then you'd have to clean that up too.

Once Shantel was bagging ice when I heard a loud crash. I stuck my head back there to see what had happened. She was on her knees in front of the machine with one finger in her mouth wiping up blood from the floor with her other hand. “Are you alright?” I asked nervously.

“Yeah. Lid of that freezer slammed on my finger. It got a piece of my meat.” She proudly displayed the finger, which was indeed missing a chunk the size of a sunflower seed and streaming blood.

“Do you want me to call someone?”

“No, I'm fine.”

I had customers, so I couldn't really argue with her. Eventually she emerged and again displayed the finger, telling me several times how she'd lost some of her “meat”. She'd secured a piece of napkin to the wound with a rubber band, but from time to time she had to replace it when the blood soaked through. I suggested several times that she go home, but she brushed me off, only to arrive at this conclusion herself about half an hour later.

What really made me uncomfortable, though, was when she asked me to cover for her with her abusive husband. She was getting ready to leave him, she told me, and was going to tell him she was working while she went out looking for a new apartment. If he happened to come by looking for her, I was to tell him that the manager had sent her to another location but that I didn't know where. It probably wouldn't have been a big deal, but I was completely unprepared to handle the situation if the guy got angry, which it sounded as if he were prone to do.

Thankfully, it never came up. Given the worry that merely imagining such a situation caused me, I sincerely hope that she did successfully leave him. No one should have to live in constant fear of provoking violent anger from a loved one.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

2009 Poker Resolutions

Resolution One: Keep Grinding NLHE Cash Games

This is my bread and butter game, and even if I don't do anything to improve, just maintaining my current winrate and putting in hours will be very valuable to me. Of course I do want to get better, but my general focus will be on playing rather than doing stuff to improve (posting hands, watching instructional videos, etc.).

Also, I'm not going to worry too much about non-NLHE games. I tried to do it last year, but it didn't prove too productive. I'll play/study them when I feel like it, but it's not going to be a priority. I'm confident in my ability to pick them up quickly should that become necessary/desirable and I choose to devote all my time to it, such that I don't think I need to prioritize working on them now.

Goal 1: Earn $X in NLHE Cash Games

It's very tough to predict or control what you earn playing tournaments. With cash games, though, it's mostly a question of game selection and putting in hours. My goal for 2009 is to earn in NLHE cash games what I made playing any form of poker in 2008, so that anything from tournaments is just a perk. Hopefully this will help me to keep my focus even if I do make a big tournament score, since that won't count towards the goal.

Goal 2: Earn Supernova status on PokerStars

This shouldn't be tough, and I'm already off to a good start. Basically I need to earn 100,000 VPP's (PokerStars' frequent player reward) over the course of the year. Having earned 3200 already, I'm on course to do this by September.

Last year, I played on Full Tilt almost exclusively because they have rakeback. My understanding is that the Stars VPP program is actually worth more if you devote the time to getting into the top tiers of it, though. Plus bigger games seem to go more frequently and are maybe a little softer.

There are a couple of drawbacks, though. For one thing, I have way more money on FTP than on Stars and it's not that easy to reload. At the moment I'm mostly grinding up my balance playing 5/10 full ring games, and that's going OK, so hopefully this won't be a barrier. But I've already passed on a few potentially good 25/50 games for lack of funds.

Also, Stars doesn't have Deep tables, which are getting really popular on FTP. They do have some tables with a 50BB minimum buy-in, which helps with the short-stacking problem, but I really like playing deep. There are a lot of regulars who can handle a 100BB stack very well but make mistakes playing 200BB deep. Since the bigger games are comprised mostly of regulars, that makes a big difference.

Still, I don't think Supernova status will be tough to get, so I'm going to go for it. The next level, Supernova Elite, require 10 times as many VPP's, though, and I don't think I have any prayer for that.

Resolution Two: Diversify My Income Streams

I laid the foundation for this last year, but I really haven't capitalized on it yet. Now that I'm starting to get a higher profile in the poker world, I think there are ways for me both to generate passive income and to combine poker with some of my other interests, such as writing and teaching.

Goal 3: Monetize This Blog

I was surprised by how much I made off of blog ads last year with virtually no effort. In general do find internet ads to be tacky and intrusive, but in this case I am giving away a lot of very valuable information at no cost to you, so I hope my dear readers will understand if there are a few ads on the page. I'll try to keep it minimally intrusive, and the plus side for you will likely be a nicer layout and better content. Expect to see a new look later this month.

Goal 4: Get Back Into Coaching

I'm not going to set an hourly goal for this because I don't want to force it, but I think I ought to do some more coaching. With the right students, it is in fact very enjoyable and rewarding. Plus, Poker Savvy tells me I can offer my students a free three-month subscription, which hopefully will sweeten the value of the package without costing me any more time. I may also consider doing group sessions that lower the costs for any individual person while helping to get me an hourly rate comparable to that of actually playing poker. Expect to see more information about this soon.

Goal 5: Market My Writing

I'm still just doing the easy stuff, writing for the occasional people who approach me. I think I want to get my name out there a little bit more and publish in some more high-profile ways. I don't know about writing my own book, but I'm in discussions with a well-known player now about contributing a chapter to a book he's doing.

Resolution Three: Improve My NLHE Skills

This is a lower priority than just putting in hours. Then again, practice is the single best way to improve, so I want to do what I can to maximize the learning value of my time at the tables.

Goal 6: Use Poker Tracker More Effectively

I barely use Poker Tracker for anything beyond record keeping, and I know I'm only getting like 10% of its value. I often don't even use the HUD because it distracts me when I'm playing a lot of tables. But I want to be able to do at least some basic evaluation of my play to try to identify some leaks, such as I found with suited connectors in one of my year-end posts. Plus I want to put together a HUD layout that is truly useful for me.

Goal 7: Finish the Year with a 4BB/100 Win-Rate at 5/10 NL.

This is somewhat beyond my control because I won't play a large enough sample size (there are good players who have had 100K hand break-even streaks), but if I can maintain this win-rate, which I think is about twice what my "true" rate is now, I'll be in great shape.

Goal 8: Play 50,000 Hands of Heads Up NLHE

If I'm not going to do PLO, heads up is probably the next best game for me to get better at. At stakes above 10/20, it's often the only way to get action, and that's even more true the higher you get. Not to mention that thinking through heads up situations makes you better at playing marginal hands in general. Maybe I'll read and review Moshman's new book as well....

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 4, 2009

2008 Year in Review

Having already posted an analysis of last year's resolutions (One, Two, and Three), I'll turn now to some year-end miscellany:

Largest Pot Won

Though I played as high as 50/100 last year, my biggest win was in a recent 10/20 heads up game. It's both the largest pot I've won in absolute dollars and also (I think) the largest in BB's, nearly 1200 of them.

Full Tilt Poker, $10/$20 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 2 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

Hero (SB): $16,884.50
BB: $11,606

Pre-Flop: 6 T dealt to Hero (SB)
Hero raises to $60, BB raises to $220, Hero raises to $588, BB raises to $1,225, Hero calls $637

Flop: ($2,450) 6 J 6 (2 Players)
BB bets $1,425, Hero raises to $3,659, BB raises to $10,381 and is All-In, Hero calls $6,722

Turn: ($23,212) T (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: ($23,212) 9 (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $23,212 Pot ($0.50 Rake)
Hero showed 6 T (a full house, Sixes full of Tens) and WON $23,211.50 (+$11,605.50 NET)
BB showed A A (two pair, Aces and Sixes) and LOST (-$11,606 NET)


A little epilogue here: I saw this guy sitting alone at a 50/100 table recently and took a seat. He played one hand and quit.

Largest Pot Lost

I wish I could say it was a bad beat or cold deck, but mostly it was just bad play:

Full Tilt Poker, $25/$50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 2 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

Hero (BB): $10,050
SB: $24,967.75

Pre-Flop: 4 A dealt to Hero (BB)
SB raises to $124, Hero raises to $411, SB calls $287

Flop: ($822) Q 8 Q (2 Players)
Hero bets $589, SB raises to $1,670, Hero calls $1,081

Turn: ($4,162) 2 (2 Players)
Hero checks, SB bets $2,575, Hero raises to $7,969 and is All-In, SB calls $5,394

River: ($20,100) 9 (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $20,100 Pot ($0.50 Rake)
Hero showed 4 A (a pair of Queens) and LOST (-$10,050 NET)
SB showed K Q (three of a kind, Queens) and WON $20,099.50 (+$10,049.50 NET)


Worst Bad Beat

As it happens, those are both from December. But I had to go all the way back to March and my days in the UB 25/50 heads up game to find the most annoying bad beat, defined as some combination of long odds and big pot:

Free hand converter brought to you by CardRunners

Seat 0: GASSITT ($4297.50) -
Seat 1: Foucault ($4500) - -

PRE-FLOP:

Foucault posts small blind $25
GASSITT posts BIG blind $50
Dealt To: Foucault


RAISE Foucault ($150)
CALL GASSITT ($150)


FLOP:

Pot: $350


CHECK GASSITT
BET Foucault ($200)
CALL Foucault ($200)


TURN:

Pot: $750


BET GASSITT ($525)
RAISE Foucault ($1650)
RAISE GASSITT ($3947.50)
CALL Foucault ($3947.50)


RIVER:

Pot: $10295




SHOWDOWN:
GASSITT:

MUCK Foucault

GASSITT collected $8594.5 from main pot with full house, fives full of jacks

SUMMARY:
Total pot: $8595 Rake: $.50

Final Board:


Seat 0: 5s Js 5h 5d Jd: full house, fives full of jacks. - Net Gain/Loss: ($3772)



Free hand converter brought to you by CardRunners

Largest Tournament Score



Yearly Profits Graph

Thanks to you all for following along this year, and best of luck at the tables (or wherever you ply your trade) in 2009.

Happy New Year!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 3, 2009

2008 Resolution 3: Diversity My Income Streams

At the beginning of last year, I set some poker resolutions and goals for myself. It's time now to see how I've fared during the course of 2008. I've already posted about my resolutions to Focus on Short-Handed No-Limit Hold 'Em Cash Games and to Keep Getting Better at Other Games.

Resolution 3: Diversify My Income Streams

I'm happy with how this turned out. I got into coaching, joined Poker Savvy Plus, and increased my income from poker writing (slightly).

Goal 7: Start making money on the blog/website. (Achieved)

I'm not making money, but at least I'm not losing it. I made about $15 off of the ads on the blog- not the old Google ads but the Amazon affiliate links on my poker book reviews. Obviously that's not much but it was enough to cover the cost of hosting the blog, which was the goal. It makes me realize that if I were to put some effort into it, my site could be worth some money. Also the blog has generated some interest for my coaching and probably contributed to my getting hired by Poker Savvy.

Goal 8: Start coaching. (Achieved)

I dove into this pretty aggressively at the beginning of the year but didn't find it as satisfying as I expected. It's tricky to find a price that's fair to the student but also worth my time relative to playing poker. To my knowledge, the students I have had have all increased their profitability and considered their lessons worthwhile. Still, the price remains a sticking point for a lot of potential students, which is understandable.

The thing is that for me to block off an hour of my time tends to be pretty disruptive of my schedule. Like if I have a four hour block when I might otherwise play poker, but a student wants a session right in the middle of that block, then it kind of screws the whole four hours. I get out of the zone and lose a lot of time in transition if I try to play for an hour, then stop and coach for an hour, then play for two more hours.

I do enjoy the personal interaction of coaching and I like seeing my students improve their confidence and their games. I'll just need to keep working on the right formula. One thing that I think will help is that Poker Savvy is now allowing me to offer free subscriptions for my students. That will both increase the value of the package for them and give them access to a lot of my own thoughts on poker theory, freeing up their paid time to focus exclusively on their application of key concepts.

Goal 9: Affiliate myself with an instructional website. (Achieved)

Early this year, I did some guest videos for Poker Savvy Plus. Those proved popular, and I met with the entire PSP team while in Las Vegas for the WSOP. Starting in August, I became a "Core Pro" and now produce four instructional videos per month for them. I've done series on Flop, Turn, and River Fundamentals, on some of my deepest tournament runs, and am now in the midst of one on Full Ring play and one joint tournament video with Tony "Bond18" Dunst.

My familiarity with education and teachers has definitely been an asset. While I'm far from the best player on the PSP staff, my videos have been among the most popular- probably because of my ability to structure and explain important concepts.

Goal 10: Get a book deal. (Failed)

Meh. I didn't really try at this, and I'm not at all sure I want to. The book market is saturated and poker's popularity is already on the decline with the general public. I don't think the kind of book I'd want to write would have broad appeal, and besides names seem to sell poker books a lot better than quality content. It's just a ton of work for surely less monetary reward than actually playing poker and less "sense of accomplishment" reward than my work with the Boston Debate League.

I do appreciate all the people who have encouraged me to write a book, though. An ego boost is always welcome!

That's the last of the resolutions. Tomorrow I'll post some year-end miscellany: more stats, biggest pots won and lost, etc. Then on Monday I'll have my resolutions for 2009. Hope the new year is treating everyone well so far- it certainly is me!

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, January 2, 2009

2008 Resolution Two: Keep Getting Better at Other Games

At the beginning of last year, I set some poker resolutions and goals for myself. It's time now to see how I've fared during the course of 2008. Yesterday, I posted about my resolution to Focus on Short-Handed No-Limit Hold 'Em Cash Games.

Resolution 2: Keep Getting Better at Other Games

I played a fair bit of PLO and watched some instructional videos, but I don't feel I'm much better at it than I was this time last year. Actually, I'm sure I am better, but the opposition has improved more than I have. It's quickly becoming a much more well-understood game, and I'm getting left behind. I'd like to get better at it, but I have only so much time to play, and the opportunity cost of playing break-even PLO at 2/4 rather than winning at 5/10 and 10/20 NLHE is pretty high.

As for other games, I played some HORSE occasionally and probably got a bit better at Stud/8, I final tabled a PLO8 tournament, but mostly I didn't do anything of significance.

Goal 4: Play some WSOP preliminary events in other games (PLHE doesn't count).
(Failed)

I think I would have been good enough to play some of the cheaper PLO and Stud/8 tournaments, but I wasn't in Vegas for them, and I certainly don't regret that. I did play some other games in FTOPS and WCOOP and did alright, including a final table in PLO8. Also, I was lucky enough to stake Tom Chambers (LearnedFromTV) on his way to two WSOP final tables in some non-NLHE games, so even though I suck at them I still found a way to profit!

Goal 5: Be a winner in 10/20 PLO by the end of the year. (Failed)

I fell so far short of this one it's laughable. At the end of 2007, I was breaking even at 2/4 and 3/6 PLO. This year, I was a pretty substantial loser at 2/4, running at -6 BB/100 over 10K hands. I feel like I ran pretty bad, but I also think PLO always feels that way because it's such a gambly game. Regardless, I'm clearly not very good at it right now.

Goal 6: Be a winner at 30/60 Stud/8 by the end of the year. (Failed)

I'm still pretty comfortable at 10/20 but I haven't put in much time or attempted to play higher. Actually, I played exactly five hands at 30/60 and lost $600, for a win-rate of -200 BB/100. Sustainable?

Tomorrow, I'll discuss my progress towards my third resolution for 2008: Diversify My Income Streams.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 1, 2009

2008 Resolution One: Focus on Short-Handed NLHE Cash Games

At the beginning of last year, I set some poker resolutions and goals for myself. It's time now to see how I've fared during the course of 2008.

Resolution 1: Focus on Short-Handed NLHE Cash Games

I pretty well kicked the tournament habit, but my focus wasn't exclusively on short-handed play. I played a fair bit of full ring NLHE as well when the games were good, and I don't regret it. Over about 170K hands played at 6-max tables at Poker Stars and Full Tilt Poker (Poker Tracker 3 doesn't collect UB stats), I ran at about 2 BB/100. This covers stakes from $.5/$1 (for a Poker Savvy video I was recording) to $50/$100, which is the biggest I've played.

Over 27K hands of heads up NLHE, I ran at nearly 4 BB/100. Sadly, a few ill-fated forays into 25/50 heads up nevertheless left me down about $35,000.

I say that I don't regret expanding into full ring because over 60K hands I ran at about 4 BB/100.

As most of you know, tournaments did still prove profitable for me thanks to a very deep run in the main event of the WSOP. For the year, I had an ROI of just over 100%, which is in line with what I hear the best tournament players tend to expect. Of course, with a sample size of 261 mostly huge-field tournaments, that's not a very meaningful number. It's scary to think how much a single card could have changed the course of my year. Change a few rivered Aces to deuces and I leave Las Vegas penniless. Then again, gimme an Ace on the river against Scott Montgomery and maybe I leave Las Vegas a millionaire. That's tournament poker.

The real issue with tournaments is that they are mostly a lot less interesting than cash and it's much harder to put an equivalent amount of money in play. Basically I could either chase the circuit around the gruddiest parts of the US (Reno! Atlantic City! Tunica!) or spend less time playing more money 8-tabling 5/10 NL Deep in the comfort of my own apartment (and underwear, if I damn well please).

Goal 1: Play no more than 400 tournaments (Achieved)

This one wasn't even close. I played just 261 tournaments, almost exclusively big buy-in, large-field events. In fact, the average prize pool in the tournaments I played was over $900,000. I still enjoy playing the biggest events like the Sunday majors, the FTOPS, and the WCOOP. However, I no longer feel any urge to play something like the 100K Guarantee on a random Thursday night.

The one good thing about tournaments is that they force me to put in hours. If I'm playing one or two tournaments, I'll generally have 6-8 cash games going on the side for 4-5 hours whereas playing exclusively cash I'd probably play 8-10 tables for just 2-3 hours before getting bored.

Goal 2: The average buy-in of the tournaments I play will be at least $500. (Failed)

I missed this one, coming in at an average buy-in of $427. If you disregard four freerolls that I played, I can get this number up to about $460, but I still played too many small buy-in events. I was also thinking I would play at least one other big B&M event besides the WSOP, which I didn't end up doing.

Goal 3: Play at least 250,000 hands of NLHE cash. (Achieved)

This was a very modest goal, and I would have been pretty ashamed if I couldn't hit it. There are people who play this much in a month. In fact, a guy from 2+2 recently won a prop bet that required him to play 600,000 hands in November! Granted I have no desire to 24-table 50NL for 13 hours a day every day, but still I really ought to play more.

Not even counting UB or the occasional live game, I played 256, 587 hands. Over that sample, I came out at 2.54 BB/100, which is good but far from spectacular. Even in the biggest games the best players are making twice that.

Of the limits where I spent most of my time, here's how it shook out:

30K hands at 10/20 NL 6-max at 3.9 BB/100

50K hands at 5/10 NL FR at 3.9 BB/100

66K hands at 5/10 6-max 0.4 BB/100

31K hands at 3/6 6-max, 1.1 BB/100

13K hands 2/4 6-max 4.9 BB/100

And for those who are curious about my play style, here are a few of my numbers with exactly 6 players at the table:

VP$IP 21 PFR 16 W$WSF 45% WTSD 24% W$SD 53%

For those who don't speak Poker Trackerese, I played 21% of my hands, open raising or 3-betting a raiser 16% of the time. This is just slightly on the tight passive side. I think a style like 22/18 would be a little better, and in general I probably call too many raises.

When I saw the flop, I won 45% of the time, which is on the low end of acceptable. Again, this could be a result of calling raises with too many speculative hands, of giving up too easily, or of not playing aggressively enough.

I went to showdown in 24% of the hands that I played and had the best hand at showdown 53% of the time. The latter figure is good, but the former is a little high and suggests that I am not bluffing or value betting quite as much as I should.

My ten most profitable hands, in order: AA, KK, AKs, TT, AKo, 33, QQ, JJ, AJs, 99. This is pretty much what I'd expect, though obviously TT belongs behind JJ and I've probably just been running good with it. And of course AQs probably belongs up there ahead of 33, again just a result of variance I suspect. Actually I do tend to use AQ as a pre-flop semi-bluff quite a bit to 4- or 5-bet all in, and when called I'm usually dominated, so that could also be what's holding AQ down.

I think the more interesting thing to see is my ten least profitable hands: 86s, A3s, 98s, AQs, 42s, 97s, 43s, 65s, JTs, 54s. I was surprised to see that they are all suited. Probably this is because I generally don't play the off-suit versions, but apparently I am not playing my suited connectors so well either. Again, this corroborates the theory that I may be calling too many raises. I'll have to work on that.

The other confounding factor here is that, as with AQ above, I tend to use suited connectors as range-balancing hands. This can be tough to conceptualize, but the fact that I am 5-betting all-in with AQ may make my entire 5-betting range more profitable because it generates additional action for my AA and KK even though it costs me money in isolation. The same could be said for the suited connectors. This is what makes it so difficult to analyze poker hands discretely.


Tomorrow, I'll discuss my progress towards my second resolution for 2008: Keep Getting Better at Other Games.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, December 26, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Rat-Man Carl

Our manager was in the store mornings almost every day, but even then he was usually in his office. Store policy was enforced on employees not through regular supervision but by the threat of surprise inspection by Carl, the manager at another branch owned by same person who owned our store. Carl would do his best to sneak into the store unseen and spring himself upon an unsuspecting employee, asking to count how much was in each register (we weren't supposed to have more than $50, or $20 overnight- everything else was dropped into a safe) and to see the checklist that every employee was supposed to keep. I called him Rat Man Carl both because of his function in the company and because of his rodent-like appearance.

I was one of the store's best employees, though it's hard to overstate just how low the bar was set. If I called five minutes before a scheduled shift to say I wasn't coming, they were just impressed that I called. I was a friend of the owner and his daughter, and once in a while old ladies would go out of their way to tell the manager how much they appreciated the nice young man who knew how to count their change back to them. There was zero chance of my being fired or reprimanded in any way, and I knew it. Consequently, I couldn't have cared less about Rat Man Carl and his surprise inspections.

He, one the other hand, took great pride in his work. I'm sure he imagined himself a secret agent as he skulked outside the store, waiting like a savanna cat for me to turn my back so that he could slink into the store and surprise me. It disappointed him to no end that I never displayed the least shock or dismay at his sudden appearance nor at the solemn warnings and stern lectures he delivered in a grave tone.

Carl's son usually worked another store but once had a shift with me. He blatantly stole whatever foodstuffs he wanted and encouraged me to do the same, going to so far as to refuse to ring me up for an ice cream sandwich I ate. I had to ring it up myself, which was itself against company policy but seemed the lesser of two evils.

Several years later I ran into Carl at a Target. We spoke for a minute, and he bragged to me about how he was moving up in the world, making $18/hour as an assistant manager and well on his way to becoming a full-fledged manager. I wished him the best.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, December 5, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Bear

Bear wasn't an employee, but he was one of our most colorful regular customers. I mean that both figuratively and literally: he was a hulking biker dude covered in ink from head to toe. Rose bushes encircled naked women on his arms, and his shiny bald head was decorated with the snearing face of a bear. Bear was a tattoo artist himself and the proprietor of a tattoo parlor called The Bear's Den.


Bear was easily 6'6, rippling with muscles, and, as I've said, covered in tattoos. Under no circumstances would I have gotten on his bad side, and it's a testament to human stupidity that anyone ever did. He told me a story once about a customer of his who requested a custom-designed tattoo. They negotiated a price, and Bear spent a couple of hours inking him up. When he was finished, the guy reached into his pocket and said, “Oh, shit, I've only got eighty-seven bucks.”


They went back and forth for a bit, but the guy insisted he couldn't get his hands on any more money and pleaded with Bear to accept much less than the price they'd agreed upon. Bear finally relented and told the guy to leave a warm, wet compress on the ink for 24 hours.


“Thing is,” Bear growled to me, “you're only supposed to leave it on for an hour. When he took the compress off, the ink would have run everywhere and left a giant brown smear permanently engraved on his arm.”

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Lighting Boston's Official Non-Demoninational Holiday Shrub

This is an honest-to-God quote from the City of Boston's official calendar:

Join the Boston Children’s Chorus (BCC) to kick off the start of the city’s holiday season! The singers will join Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino for one of the city’s most cherished events- the lighting of Boston’s official non-denominational holiday shrub, and trees throughout Boston Common, The Public Garden and Commonwealth Avenue Mall. The BCC is an accomplished children’s singing group with nine choirs and 300 singers ranging from ages seven to eighteen years old. BCC has performed at the Democratic National Convention, Governor Deval Patrick’s Inauguration, and with the Boston Pops.

A few years ago there was a big stink about the City of Boston keeping an official Christmas tree on the Boston Commons. Mayor Menino's decision to keep the tree but not call it a Christmas tree surprisingly drew the ire of the pro-Christmas folks, which I think is pretty stupid. They accused him of bowing to political correctness, but in reality it was more like mooning the PC crowd. Clearly decorating a tree but not calling it a Christmas tree is not in the spirit of what the PC folks were demanding, and the pro-Christmas people got pretty much everything they wanted save the name. I guess the symbolism was important to them.

Anyway, I can't imagine this hilarious title being anything but an attempt to portray the PC demands as absurd. Regardless of what you think about the whole issue, it's pretty badass I think to poke fun at the whole thing in so public and official a fashion.

Labels: ,

Friday, November 28, 2008

Happy Thanksgiving!

I hope all the Americans and anyone else who celebrated Thanksgiving yesterday had a nice time. I'd like to express my gratitude to everyone who reads and/or comments here at thinkingpoker. It's enormously gratifying to know that there are people out there interested in what I have to say about this fascinating game. I'm particularly flattered by those of you who aren't serious poker players yourselves but nonetheless find something of interest here.

Lastly, I'm grateful for double floats that turn into runner-runner-nuts in 3-bet pots (played this hand yesterday but don't have HH from laptop):

5/10 NLHE with 2K stacks, I open to $35 with 43s on the CO, fish in SB calls, BB squeezes to $140, I call, fish folds. Flop K82 with one of my suit, BB bets $220, I call planning to take it away if he shows weakness or I turn a good draw. Turn is an A he bets $475 I ought to shove or fold here but for some reason I make a terrible call instead thinking I can shove river if he checks. River is a 5 to give me the nuts and he shoves into me for $1200 or so. I call and beat his AQ.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Gary

Gary was a tough guy to work with. He had some mental disabilities that prevented him from engaging fully in the idle banter that generally passed between co-workers. Most of the time he did his job just as well as if not better than the other employees, but his strength in this regard was also his weakness.

Gary was a real stickler for directions and procedure. As you might imagine, the operation of a 7-11 is designed to be pretty idiot-proof. There are simple instructions for operating everything and a checklist that every employee is supposed to follow on every shift. Of course, most employees neither used the checklist nor diligently completed all of their tasks, particularly the least popular ones. Gary, however, did everything just as it was supposed to be done every time.

That was all well and good when things were running smoothly. The problem was that Gary had no capacity for troubleshooting or adaptation. He was relieving me once at the end of a shift on the Fourth of July. When doing a shift change, each of the two registers needs to be closed down individually and its contents counted and verified by both employees. Generally this is to be done at a time where there is no line in the store.

That July Fourth was a hot, sunny summer holiday, and we were doing a booming business in ice, charcoal, ketchup, hot dog rolls, and other barbecue accouterments. A line of customers had wrapped halfway around the store since the beginning of my shift, and it was clear to me that there was never going to be a quiet moment for a shift change. We needed to just shut down one register and count the money as quickly as possible despite the line, but convincing Gary to cooperate with this was nearly impossible.

So here I am arguing with this guy who can barely express or comprehend a coherent thought while both of us are trying desperately to keep up with the burgeoning swarm of customers. A kid who looked to be about 15 asked for a pack of cigarettes. I was far from diligent about carding people, but in this case there was a store full of gossipy judgmental soccer moms and a co-worker who was somewhat likely to report me if he noticed, so I asked to see his ID. Plus, the kid looked like an asshole.

He handed me the license of a woman who was several years older than he and looked nothing like him. “Don't waste my time,” I told him, thrusting the license back at him and turning my attention to the next customer. “Next!”

“What? That's my license. Man, sell me some cigarettes.”

I didn't even look up from my next transaction. “That was a woman's license. Get out of here.”

“You better sell me some fucking cigarettes.” Now I looked up.

I didn't feel the least bit threatened in a store full of people, but I didn't want the kid to make a scene or waste any more time. “Do I need to call the police?” I asked, reaching for the phone.

“What the fuck?” he responded.

“Alright, that's enough,” boomed a voice from several spots back in the line. “There are kids in this store.” The voice belonged to a burly guy with a leather jacket and a bandanna wrapped around his head.

The kid headed for the door, but turned back and shouted, “Man, fuck you both.”

“Fuck me? You meet me out in the parking lot, you little shit,” the guy boomed back. Needless to say, the little punk was not in the parking lot when the man left the store. And, I eventually got Gary to comply with the shift change, though he made clear that he was annoyed by it.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Boston Debate in the News

The Boston Herald ran an article this morning about the Boston Debate League and one of its member schools which was nearly closed by the school district:

The debate team at the Academy of Public Service sailed into the “elite eight” last year at the national championships in Chicago.

Now, thanks to that oratorical success, the debaters have talked their way into another year of funding as their school merges with the nearby Noonan Business Academy in Codman Square.

“The output of the debate team was a big part of the decision,” said team coach Locksley Bryan. “They saw these kids doing academic calisthenics at a very high level and it impressed them.”

The backstory, as I understand it, is that several years ago the Boston Public Schools received a multi-year, multi-million-dollar grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to support a transition to small schools. The grant funded the dissolution of Boston's large public high schools into multiple small schools sharing a single building. Thus, what was Dorchester High School became three schools within the renamed Dorchester Education Complex: Tech Boston, Noonan Business Academy, and the Academy of Public Service (APS).

Dorchester is one of the more troubled neighborhoods in Boston, and these schools had more than their share of problems. APS, however, was fortunate enough to have a wonderful headmaster and several great teachers who saw the value that a debate team could have for their students and their school. They got in touch with me, and I helped them start such a program three years ago.

Thanks to the efforts of the aforementioned faculty, APS quickly became one of the most successful schools in the League, putting up some of the best participation numbers and repeatedly taking top honors at citywide competitions. This was a big deal for a school that used to be known derogatorily among Boston's young people as "Dumbchester".

The Gates grant expires at the end of the current school year, and BPS seems to be reconsolidating some (though not nearly all) of the small schools it created. APS was slated to be absorbed by the more popular Tech Boston and its students dispersed. However, teachers, faculty, students, alumni, and community members rallied in support of their school. As the most eloquent orators, several of the debaters took leadership roles in this effort, speaking before the Boston Schools Committee about the value of the Academy of Public Service. The debate team was one of the flagship programs to which they pointed as evidence of the school's success.

As an organization, we've learned a lot from this event. We've come to appreciate more fully how much a debate team can transform a school culture, ultimately affecting even non-debaters in a positive way. When intellectual competition takes on the fun, excitement, credibility, and even popularity of a sports team at a school, that school is bound to improve. Joining the debate team becomes a cool, or at least socially acceptable, thing to do, and more kids get into it. These students, and the teachers who coach them, bring their newly acquired skills into their classrooms, raising the quality of the class for all its students.

An alumnus of the APS debate team who now volunteers as a judge at our competitions put it best when he told me, "If they had said three years ago that they wanted to close APS, I wouldn't have argued with them. It was a bad school. But it changed when the debate team came along. Debate turned around a lot of kids lives. Kids who were going to drop out started coming to school again so they could debate. It's a much better school now and I don't think they should close it."

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, November 21, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Mark

Mark was our youngest employee. I knew him first as a customer who came in nearly every day and talked about how badly he wanted to work in the store. Sure enough, he started work on his sixteenth birthday.

The 7-11 was just a stepping stone for Mark, though. His real aspiration was to be a police officer. Even before he was working with us, he got to know all of the officers who frequented our store. Once he was working there, it was even worse. If there was a cop in the store, it was nearly impossible to get Mark to do any work. There could an empty cooler and a line a mile-long, and Mark would be over by the coffee counter hounding the officers.

Mark was generally pretty law-abiding himself, but I did once see him sell cigarettes to two girls who were no older than fourteen. After completing the sale, he stepped outside and returned a minute or two later. “Did you sell them cigarettes?" I asked, more surprised than scolding.

He grinned. “They showed me their boobies.”

Mark was working with me one day when a group of guys in their early twenties came into the store asking about Pokemon cards. This was at the height of the game's popularity, and even at $5 a pack we couldn't keep them in stock. We'd just gotten a shipment, though, so when the guys asked if we had any purple packs, I was able to tell them that we did.

It immediately struck me as strange that these young men were asking about the cards. They seemed to old to play but too young to have kids who played. More strangely, they didn't actually want to buy any of the cards. Instead, they asked for a carton of cigarettes, which required me to step away from the counter and dig around in a cabinet for their requested brand.

When I returned, the guys were gone. I quickly checked the box of Pokemon cards which was sitting out on the counter with the other impulse purchase items. I never would have known for sure that they'd taken anything, since I had no idea how many packs there were to begin with, except that there were now no more purple packs. Had the guys not specifically asked about them and had me verify just a minute ago that there had been some, I would have had no way of proving they'd stolen them.

Amazingly, they were still sitting out in the parking lot in their car. I jotted down the license, and more annoyed at the brazenness and stupidity of their crime than anything else, I called the manager.

“How many packs did they take?”

“I don't know.”

“Eight.”

“Huh?”

“They took eight packs. If you don't give the police an exact number, they won't do anything with the report.”

I called the police, and they said they'd send someone by eventually. There was less than an hour left in Mark's shift, but he stuck around for another hour waiting for the police to come. Finally he left but begged me to call him when the police did arrive, which I didn't.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Norman

Norman was in his early thirties when I worked with him, and in retrospect a giant fuck-up. He was a lot of fun to work with, though. When we were bored, which of course was quite often, Norman would sporadically break into a verse or two of a self-invented ditty. His most commonly repeated riff was “Noooooooobody loooooooooves old Normannnnnnn,” though he'd sometimes substitute my name or that of another employee. I called him “Stormin' Norman” because he was the kind of guy who needed a nickname.

I don't know the full story of how he ended up working at a 7-11, but over time I learned a few tidbits about him that suggest a more thorough explanation. He'd lost his driver's license to multiple DWI's, for instance, and had to take the bus to work. I lived just across the street from the store, so generally I walked to work, but once I had a car with me for some reason and offered him a ride, which he declined.

From time to time he would recount a ribald tale from one of his recent exploits. Being a teenage boy, I was usually eager to hear more. I asked him if he'd ever been with two women at once. He sighed. “Yeah. Couple of times. It's not all it's cracked up to be, believe me. It's very difficult to attend to two at once. A lot of pressure. I couldn't keep up with them.”

Norm's aspiration, which was common among those for whom 7-11 was part of a career path, was to get a job with one of the many companies that supplied ours and other convenience stores. He always chatted with the vendors who delivered to our store and frequently asked about opportunities. Norm left without any fanfare, which I've always hoped was because he got his dream job wheeling crates of soda or ice cream bars in and out of big white trucks and glass storefronts on a dolly.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, November 6, 2008

America's Black Precedent

I wrote this yesterday, about 12 hours after McCain's concession, but didn't get a chance to post it until today.

I can't bring myself to get as excited as I feel I should be about Obama's victory. I was pulling for him- he was in fact the first major party candidate for whom I voted in a presidential election- but neither his victory nor the historic election of America's first black president excites me the way they have others.

It's nothing personal about Obama. He seems to be a smart and capable candidate and who may well prove a good president. But I just can't imagine him deserving or living up to the incredible expectations that seem to be invested in him.

His victory is being celebrated as a mandate for change, a watershed moment for liberalism in America, and a civil rights milestone. I believe it is all of these things, but not to the extent so many people seem to think.

Not in the case of the latter two, anyway. With regard to the mandate for change, I think that expectations are hopelessly high. Much was made, in the days before the election, of the hope that voters, particularly black ones, had invested in Obama. There was talk of unprecedented engagement with the political process among African-Americans and speculation about the sense of disenfranchisement that might ensue if Obama were somehow to lose.

My worry is that a similar disappointment may be experienced not only despite but because of his victory. Obama will inherit a plummeting economy, an endless war, and spiraling debt. Whether his fault or not, things are likely to get worse before they get better, especially for the least advantaged Americans. If the poor still struggle to make rent, if black Americans remain over-incarcerated and under-educated by the machinery of government, in four years, will there not be an even greater sense of disenfranchisement? Will there not be a temptation, among the many who are not living the American dream, to conclude that if not even this president can advance their interests, then they are truly and irrevocably disenfranchised by the American political process?

There is also the danger that white America will rest on its laurels as it has after every major advance in civil rights. Reconstruction amendments called for equal rights and suffrage for former slaves, yet many remained disenfranchised and in a state of near-enslavement. The Brown decision declared segregation unconstitutional, yet public schools across America remain blatantly segregated. A black man has been elected president, yet he did so at a time when there was only one black Senator (Obama himself) and two black governors (Deval Patrick of Massachusetts and David Paterson of New York, though only the former was elected to the office).

The presidency is an historic landmark in the slow march towards equality, but it is hardly the final hurdle. Black representation in the highest political offices in America mirrors that in the executive offices of corporate America or on the campuses of elite educational institutions. It is far easier to promote a few exceptional candidates (and this son of a black African father and a white woman from Kansas, raised in Hawaii and Indonesia, is nothing if not exceptional) than to extend the fruits of opportunity, wealth, and success to the millions of Americans who need and deserve them.

I am probably being too hard on America. During the primary, I expressed deep skepticism about America's ability to elect a black president. Even when victory seemed inevitable, I continued to reserve doubts. “I don't bet against racism in America,” I told friends. I am tremendously glad to be proven wrong. Truthfully, I am more genuinely proud of my country today than I have ever been.

Yet soaring speeches and tearful faces on television failed to resonate with me. I wandered the streets of Boston, feeling lost in a sea of honking horns, cheering college students, and strangers embracing. The most incredible displays of raw emotion stirred envy in me but not excitement or joy. I fear that so much of this enthusiasm will prove misguided.

The only sentiment expressed last night to which I could relate came from a long-time civil rights activist commenting briefly on NBC. This black woman had marched with Martin Luther King and been beaten half to death for the cause. Choked with emotion, she proclaimed this an historic day for America.

The anchor, who was also black, asked if she would agree that this demonstrated that the US really was an exceptional country because of its ability to change and overcome the mistakes of its past. It was exactly the sort of hyperbole that worried me.

The woman's demeanor changed quickly and dramatically, and she seemed almost hostile as she answered, “It proves that change is possible when people work for it. It doesn't just happen automatically, by magic. People have to work, fight, struggle, and die to make this country change.”

The anchor turned to pose the same question to a white man, who eagerly agreed. “This proves that anything is possible in America,” he declared, voice heavy with self-satisfaction. There was nothing contradictory about their statements, but when it came to subtext the two interviewees were miles apart. He almost made it sound as though the work were finished. She insisted that it was only just beginning.

Obama's victory does demonstrate America's extraordinary potential. Hopefully it will revive the sense of boundless possibility that has been this country's strength and which is sorely needed now. But, as his acceptance speech made clear, it demonstrates only potential. There is a tremendous amount of work and sacrifice ahead of us before we can even begin to realize that potential. I sincerely hope that our new president proves capable not only of inspiring but of leading, and that my countrymen prove willing to follow. I am certainly more hopeful about our prospects than I have been in a long time, and for that I offer my thanks and congratulations to Barack Obama.

Labels: , ,

Tales From a 7-11: Bear

Bear wasn't an employee, but he was one of our most colorful regular customers. I mean that both figuratively and literally: he was a hulking biker dude covered in ink from head to toe. Rose bushes entangled themselves with naked women on his arms, and his shiny bald head was decorated with the snearing face of a bear. Bear was a tattoo artist himself and the proprietor of a tattoo parlor called The Bear's Den.

Bear was easily 6'6, rippling with muscles, and as I've said, covered in tattoos. Under no circumstances would I have gotten on his bad side, and it's a testament to human stupidity that anyone ever did. He told me a story once about a customer of his who requested a custom-designed tattoo. They negotiated a price, and Bear spent a couple of hours tattooing him. When he was finished, the guy reached into his pocket and said, “Oh, shit, I've only got eighty-seven bucks.”

They went back and forth for a bit, but the guy insisted he couldn't get his hands on any more money and pleaded with Bear to accept much less than the price they'd agreed upon. Bear finally relented and told the guy to leave a warm, wet compress on the ink for 24 hours.

“Thing is,” Bear growled to me, “you're only supposed to leave it on for an hour. When he took the compress off, the ink would have run everywhere and left a giant brown smear permanently engraved on his arm.”

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Hatty

Hatty was about my age, maybe a year older, but very much a teenager. The 7-11 where we worked was in Baltimore County, but it was just over the city line on Edmondson Avenue. Thus, it was quite accessible by public bus, which was how Hatty got there for her shifts.

She was the first person from a vastly different racial and socio-economic background with whom I'd had to interact regularly, but we actually hit it off quite well. She was fun to talk to and laughed at my jokes. Sometimes we played little tricks on each other

When her pregnancy started to show, we talked about the child's father. He was a few years older, but still in the picture. Her man wasn't working at the moment, which was why Hatty carried her unborn child thirty minutes each way on the bus five days a week to a 7-11 out in the county. He was looking for work, though, and she was sure they would get married one day.

Hatty asked if I had a girlfriend, and I fabricated a long story about how I was dating a divorced forty-year old mother of two. I let it slip that my little lady was currently locked up at Jessup but confessed that we had great sex during the bi-weekly conjugal visits she was permitted. I had Hatty going until I tried to tell her that this woman was black. She scoffed and replied, “Pfft, you couldn't get no black girl.”

Hatty left the store when she entered her third trimester, and I never saw her again.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, October 31, 2008

Tales From a 7-11: Sam

I haven't played much poker of late, but for some reason I was compelled recently to write a series of vignettes from my days as a 7-11 employee. I figured I might as well post them here on days that I don't have anything poker-related to say. Please let me know whether or not they are interesting to you; your feedback will determine whether and how I often I post future installments.

Sam

Sam was the store's oldest and longest standing employee. A Vietnam vet in his late fifties, he only worked the overnight shift. I heard rumors that he had money and didn't need to work but was just looking for something to do nights.

The overnight shift could drive you crazy, no doubt, but on the other hand one had to be a bit crazy already to request it. Most of the job was cleaning and organizing the store, receiving deliveries, and standing around idle and lonely (it was the only shift to which just one employee was assigned). The mundanity was punctuated by the occasional visit from the crazies who only come out at night.

Sam was everyone's least favorite employee. He was a grouch and a hard-ass who would savagely berate whomever he was relieving for the smallest infraction: a sticky spot on the floor, a less-than-full freezer, or an insufficient number of milk cartons on display. I was terrified of him.

No one dared to give Sam a nickname, but if I had the opportunity now, I would call him Scrappy. He was short, barely five feet tall, but solidly built and tough as nails. He was balding but wore a Chuck Norris beard and a twenty-four hour sneer.

The manager once showed me security camera footage from a robbery. A little after 2AM, a huge black guy with arms like tree trunks came into the store. He asked for a carton of cigarettes. On the video, you can see Sam step away from the counter and out of view to retrieve them. Chained to the counter was a donation box for the funeral of a police officer who'd been hit by a car during a traffic stop. The thief grabbed the box and ripped it chain and all off the counter, then ran for the door.

The next thing you can see on the video is Sam coming back into view, vaulting over the counter like an Olympic hurdler and sprinting after the guy. I don't know what he thought he was going to do if he caught the guy, which he didn't.

I eventually won Sam's grudging respect via immaculate preparation at the end of my shifts. Everything was all ready for him, we'd change over the registers in a minute flat, and then I'd spend the half hour that we were both in the store bagging ice and filling the coolers. As I left, Sam would thank me, wish me a good night, and occasionally even smile, which was a hell of a lot more than anyone else could get from him.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 16, 2008

I Associate With Terrorists

About five years ago, when I was a senior in college, I attended a panel on education reform that a professor of mine had organized. One of the panelists was "domestic terrorist" Bill Ayers. I don't recall what Ayers was bloviating about, but he told some story about seeing a group of big, "thugged out" guys getting interviewed by a reporter at a high school in a rough part of Chicago. He asked if they were the football team and was told that in fact they were the chess team, and that they had won the city championships. He was surprised that that this school with a bad reputation in a bad part of town would be so into chess. I didn't know about the chess championship, but I actually coached debate at the same school.

After the panel, there was a reception. It was a small crowd, and I was one of the only students there, certainly the least consequential person by a mile. My professor called Bill over to introduce him to me, and I began to tell him my story, "I was interested to hear about the [High School] chess team you met, because I actually coach a debate team at that same school. I've had similar-"

Before I finish my second sentence, Bill cuts me off, grabs my hand, says "Great to meet you," turns his back, and goes over to talk to someone else.

So yeah, Bill Ayers is a terrorist. And a douchebag.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 4, 2008

WSOP Trip Report Conclusion

The finale of my trip report from the 2008 WSOP is now appearing in the October issue of 2+2 Internet Magazine. I must say, getting down to the final tables of this huge tournament is a pretty thrilling experience, at once exciting and surreal:

"On Day 6 of the main event, the Amazon Room was empty. Nine tables were collected in one corner of the immense room, 80% of which was utterly vacant. A single cocktail waiter patrolled between tables. Floor staff and press chatted idly as they waited for something to happen. Tensile cord stretched an oval around the 79 remaining players, so that every table was on the perimeter and observers could easily watch any of them."

If you haven't read them already, you should probably start with Part 1 and Part 2.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, October 3, 2008

September

Despite a pretty rough WCOOP (or maybe because of- it did compel me to put in a lot of hours), September was a solid month. Even after some of those long sessions, though, I barely averaged twenty hours a week. I just don't think I'm going to hit my goal of averaging 25 hours per week. Thanks to the WSOP, though, I've already hit my monetary goal for the year, so I guess that's alright. then again, I crossed that line back in July as well but ended up sliding pretty substantially back under it and only recently dug myself back out. Nothing's guaranteed, of course, but I'm feeling pretty good at the moment.

I played about 28K hands of NLHE ring games online, and despite losing money at the highest stakes I was playing (10/20), I was at 8 BB/100 for the month, so no complaints there.

There are no major tournament series coming up this month, and I'm starting to have less responsbility with the BDL, so hopefully this will be a good opportunity to grind some higher stakes cash games. I've pretty much obtained my goal of becoming a winning regular at 10/20, so with a little work, I think I can definitely be there by the end of the year.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

ESPN Tonight

ESPN tells me that I'm scheduled to be on one of tonight's broadcasts, though they've been wrong about that before. My best guess is that it will be the 8PM eastern one, which focuses on Day 3, as that was when I rivered a two outer on the bubble that cost some poor bloke $22K. If I am on, I'll try to post a YouTube clip here as soon as I can find one.

I was impressed, by the way, with the producer who called me. He asked for my online screenname, and when I told him Foucault, he said, "Oh, like the philosopher?" It's not a reference that a lot of people in the poker world get, and arrogant ivory tower denizen that I am, I didn't expect an ESPN producer to be on the short list.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 4, 2008

August

Didn't get many NLHE cash games in this month. The month started with FTOPS, so I was playing more tournaments than usual. It wasn't a good series for me, but I was doing alright on the side. Then I spent the second half of the month running a summer camp for the BDL (hence the slow pace of posting- that will pick up next week). When I was directing the League, so much of my job was like administration, management, politicking, advocacy, and I rarely spent time actually working with students. Generally, working with them was like the amphetamine that got me excited and kept me going through the more tedious work.

I must admit, though, that spending five hours a day, five days a week in charge of a bunch of teenagers is more than a little exhausting. Even though we had a great group that was for the most part eager to learn about debate and easy to get along with, it was still a lot of work and pretty draining. I was in no mood to play poker at the end of a day, that's for sure.

Here's me taking notes on the board during a short debate two of our students had about the morality of eating meat.

Poker-wise, I ended the month almost exactly dead even after rakeback. I guess that's not too bad given that my several forays into 25-50 resulted in several bad beats to the tune of five figures. I did make more of an effort to learn PLO, watching the PLO Leakfinder series on Cardrunners and the PLO guest series that Tom Chambers did for Poker Savvy Plus. I put in several sessions at 2/4, and even though I was a net loser, I feel like I am getting much better at reading hands and board textures.

The World Championship of Online Poker starts today, but I probably won't begin playing in earnest until next week, so that's when you can expect to see more regular posts. Sorry for the extended silence.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, September 1, 2008

WSOP Trip Report Days 3 and 4

My latest poker article, a strategy-filled narrative from my third and fourth days at the World Series of Poker Main Event, is now appearing in the September Issue of 2+2 Internet Magazine. Here's an excerpt from early on Day 4:

At this point, I was rolling along with a very nice stack, and there were just a few hundred competitors left in the tournament. My girlfriend was about to fly out to Las Vegas to support me. She had just passed through security when it happened.

I raised to 15K first to act with K-J of clubs and got called by a grizzled man who looked to be in his late 50’s or early 60’s. The flop came A-Q-6 with two clubs, giving me a flush draw and a one-card straight draw. Even without all my draws, this is a good flop to bet at, because as the pre-flop raiser, I am more likely to hold an Ace than my opponent who just called a raise. I bet out 35K, and he raised to 75K. I moved all in, and he called with Ace-Queen for top two pair. None of my draws got there, and just like that I was crippled, down to about 150K.

“Nice hand,” I muttered as I pushed my chips to the winner. His withered old man jaws stopped smacking on a wad of gum long enough to thank me.

I stepped away from the table to cool my head and call my girlfriend. I told her what had happened.

“We’re going to be boarding in twenty minutes,” she advised me.

“I’m not sure what to tell you. I have no way of knowing how long I’ll last. It’s going to be touch or go until I either get some more chips or get knocked out.”

If you'd prefer a more visual summary of the tournament, check out Poker Savvy Plus, where I'm working on a series of videos covering these and other hands I played in the 2008 Main Event.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Poker Savvy Plus Interview

There's a 15-minute video interview with me over at Poker Savvy Plus that I think came out pretty well. It touches on how I got involved in poker, my playing style, some common mistakes I see, and how poker interacts with my non-profit work.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Two DNC Convention Observations

I haven't watched or followed much of the DNC Convention, but I've seen enough to make these two observations:

1. Hillary Clinton and the Glass Ceiling. Before Hillary's speech, they did this video montage thing that was all about how she may not shattered the "glass ceiling" that restricts the opportunities available to women in America but she cracked in 1000 places or something. The insinuation was very much that she lost not because Obama was the better candidate but because he was a man and she was a woman and America is unfair. I'm generally fairly sympathetic to that kind of argument, but I don't think it holds much water in this case given that Obama is contending with a glass ceiling of his own.

More importantly, though, this is just the wrong message for her to be sending. She lost the primariy, and her role now is to suck it up and throw her support behind Obama. McCain is proof that candidates who lose in a primary but toe the party line for the general election can still be viable candidates eight years down the road. McCain had much more legitimate grievances in light of the dirty tricks that Bush/Rove employed against him in 2000, but he swallowed his pride, fell into line, and now he's getting his moment.

Clinton claims she is going to play ball, but it's a stretch to say that she is throwing her support behind Obama. It's more like a weak lob. She's taking every opportunity to draw attention to the fact that she thinks she should have won, that she was the better candidate, and that she is only supporting Obama because that's what's required of her now. Of course, such "support" doesn't really count for much when it's accompanied by a wink and a nod designed to let everyone know that in her view, he is not the strongest possible candidate.

2. I turned on the TV today to see Biden's speech, and there was a woman on a red-lit stage singing "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" with a team of background dancers behind her. I assumed this was part of the DNC Convention until I saw Simon Cowell clapping for her. I think it's funny that the conventions have become such an act of political theater that a casual viewer can confuse them with reality television.

Labels: ,

Friday, August 15, 2008

Happy Birthday, Dad!

I was too inconsiderate to order your gift well in advance and too cheap to get expedited shipping, so it may not arrive tomorrow. But it will be there soon. In the meantime, here are photos from Bryce and Zion Canyons. For everyone who wasn't there, I've included the occasional caption. I couldn't recommend these two parks highly enough- some of the most beautiful places I've been. Way better than the Grand Canyon, in my opinion, which is remarkable only because it is big. My father, my brother, and I spent a few days out there between Day 1 and Day 2 of the WSOP.

This one is known as the sinking ship.

You can only see one of them but there were actually three of these little bridges crossing this narrow canyon.














This one looks a lot like a priest, if you zoom in.


My brother and me (unshaven and with hat hair).


My father, who commandeered the straw hat Poker Stars gave me. It definitely looked better on him.

Petrified rock.


Dad playing with his hand-held video camera.



Labels: ,

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Going Pro

As of yesterday, I'm now a Core Pro, as opposed to a Guest Pro, at Poker Savvy Plus. This means I'll be making videos more consistently for them: five times per month, so roughly one a week.

It's a great honor to be affiliated with Poker Savvy Plus, because as far as I'm concerned, this site is at the forefront of poker instruction.

I like that we are moving past the model of "watch me while I play poker and talk about whatever happens" and focusing on the targeted development of specific skills. Don't get me wrong, I've learned a lot from the traditional "sweat" video, and now that I'll be producing videos more regularly, you'll see some of those from me as well. But I also have a background in teaching and working with teachers, and I know that there are much more effective ways of helping people learn. I'm committed to pushing the envelope when it comes to techniques and methods for teaching poker, and I like that Poker Savvy Plus is as well.

Remember, if you want to check out any of my videos, it's free to sign up and you get a 7-day free trial.

Labels: , , ,

WSOP: The First Two Days

I'm going to be publishing my trip report from my 35th place finish at the 2008 World Series of Poker Main Event in three installments in the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine. The first installment, covering Days 1 and 2, has just been published in the August issue.

You can read trip reports from other events, including the 2006 and 2007 WSOP, in their entirety on my website.

Oh and for those of you who have been getting e-mails from me, there is some additional information in this version of the trip report, though not a lot.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, August 1, 2008

July

I had the best year of my poker career last month :-). Obviously that was thanks to cashing for $193,000 at the WSOP. It's pretty freaky to think that there were several spots in the tournament, most notably when I was all in with AK vs JJ and spiked an Ace on the river, where a single card would have ended up changing my fortune so drastically. Of course I know that's a stupid way of thinking about it, but it's just an eerie feeling.

Here's my year-to-date graph. As you can see from the little blip after the huge spike, I've actually done pretty well in the few hands that I've played since as well.

I actually haven't quite hit my goal for the year yet (yeah, I'm ambitious), but I'm very very close now, so I think I'm actually going to spend less time grinding NLHE. I want to focus my attention now on getting better at some other games, especially PLO. I may even hire a coach- any suggestions?

Labels: ,

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

WSOP 2008 Trip Report

Thanks to everyone who's asked about these, and especially to Nick from London who prompted me to make this post I've been meaning to make. I'm really flattered that you all are so eager to read a trip report from the WSOP. I'm going to be publishing the trip report, probably in three parts, in lieu of my usual strategy articles for 2+2 Internet Magazine. Of course there will still be strategy content, but I hope also to maintain some of the "flavor" of my reporting from earlier WSOPs. The first installment, covering days 1 and 2, should be appearing August 1st- I'll post the link when it's published. If you haven't already, may I suggest reading my reports from the 2006 WSOP and 2007 WSOP in the meantime?

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Funny Search Terms

I was looking through my Stat Counter log today for a glimpse of how people were finding my blog, what links and search terms they were using, etc. I came across two funny ones. Well, the first is really more disturbing than funny. One person googled "How to kill everyone with your mind" and found my review of Kill Everyone. I tried it, and I am in fact on the first page of search results for that phrase on Google.

A lot of poker players google their own screen names to see what others are writing about them. I think that's a pretty normal curiosity and not excessively egotistical or anything. But someone, presumably FU_15, searched for "FU_15 keep dominating online poker". That's kind of presumptuous.

Labels: ,

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Brags

I'll lead off with the big one. My girlfriend pointed out to me that although a few people posted it as a comment, I hadn't actually made a post that included my finish at the World Series of Poker. Out of 6,844 players, I finished 35th and won $193,000. How sexy is this?


The check is for $191,000 because I left a $2000 tip for the dealers. That might seem like a lot, but 1% is pretty standard, and remember that you only tip when you cash, so in some sense the 10% who make the money are tipping for the 90% who did not as well as for themselves. It's kind of a screwy system, but that's how it works.

The other big news, which would have been the lead item any other week, is that as of August 4th I will no longer be the director of the Boston Debate League. The League is getting larger, serving more students and schools, and partnering with the central administration of the Boston Public Schools. Running it is turning into a full time job for which I have neither the time nor the inclination.

We're very fortunate that the chairman of our Board is also the founder and managing partner of Isaacson, Miller, an international executive search firm for nonprofits. Ordinarily they work with big organizations like museums and universities, but one of their associates, who is also a Board member, helped us conduct a nationwide search for a director. We hired a great candidate who is frankly more qualified than I thought we were going to find. I'll still be working with the League, having a paid, full time employee is going to make a world of difference for us.

July's been an exciting month. I went from being way behind pace for hitting my yearly goal for poker income to being just a hair's breath away. I probably won't end up meeting my goal for hours played since I won't feel like forcing myself to put in hours when I don't feel like playing. On the plus side, I probably will play more non-hold 'em games, and I may even hire a PLO coach.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Shameless Self-Promotion

Frankly, I didn't do a very good job of courting/attracting media attention despite my deep run in the WSOP. But here are a few links to coverage of my play:

Interview with Poker Stars

O By the Way Blog 1

O By the Way Blog 2

PokerNews Photos

Poker Savvy/Cardplayer Round Table

And honorable mention goes to the Hendon Mob, who reported that:

"Only five players -- Andrew Brokos, Pat Dattilo, Marc Friedman, Vinod Jadav, and Stefan Mattsson -- cashed in both the 2006 and 2007 Main Events. All were going for their third consecutive cash this year. However, only one player survived (and is guaranteed to cash). He is Stefan Mattsson, from Stockholm, Sweden – currently in 308th place)."

Really, 308th place? Sick run, Stefan. I'm really surprised there were only five of us who cashed in '06 and '07.

Also according to Hendon Mob, the record for consecutive cashes is held by Bo Sehlstedt, who cashed in 2004-2007 but failed to cash this year. C'mon, Stefan, we can take him.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Day 2B

The numbers are in, and 6,844 players entered the 2008 World Series of Poker Main Event. Fewer than half survived Day 1, and only about 1/3 of those will survive Day 2. Hopefully I will be among them.

I've done some research to learn my Day 2 seating assignment along with the players and chip stacks against whom I'll be competing. Here's the table:

George Price 35,700
James Viglizzo 10,900
Bernd Hirschberg 32,750
Thomas Wayne 11,125
Andrew Brokos 67,125
Drew Matheson 64,925
Steve Wong 43,350
Duane Woolsey 44,850
J McLane 16,525

There's a lot of good news here. I've got the most chips of anyone and far more than most. Google wasn't able to turn up much on most of these players, suggesting that they are probably amateurs with limited poker knowledge/experience.

The bad news is that the players who are 2nd, 3rd, and 4th in chips are all lined up on my left. This means I will have to act before them in most pots, putting me at a distinct disadvantage against them. There are also not that many chips at our table. While that means there are fewer threats to my survival, there are also fewer chips for me to win. There's no prize for surviving Day 2, and if I do survive, I'm going to need every chip I can get for future days.

The only recognizable player here is Steve Wong. Steve is a professional originally from Hoofdorp, outside of Amsterdam. He was a very successful tournament player online and has now had a lot of live success as well. There's an interview with him on Youtube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F9YV6vC6cM.

Be sure to check out the comments to this post throughout the day, as I'm going to ask a few friends to post comments with update chip counts and maybe some key hands as well.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Quite the Upgrade

Even though I eventually won a WSOP seat through Stars, they were out of hotel rooms at the Palms, so my only option was to take $1000 in exchange for their sponsorship. Cheapskate that I am, I spent my first few nights at the Imperial Palace. The room was nothing special, but it was better than I expected. It even had a little balcony with a decent view of Caesar's and Bellagio:


Having survived Day 1, I decided to treat myself on subsequent days. I booked a suite at the Rio, which was remarkably cheap (I'm paying barely more than I did at AP), and is way bigger and more badass:


It has a slightly better view as well:

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, July 7, 2008

My First Day in Vegas

I came out to Vegas a few days early to get into the swing of things, to see some friends with whom I play and talk poker regularly online but rarely see in real life, and to take care of some business. This will be my third time playing in the main event, and it amazes me how much has changed since I first came to Las Vegas two years ago. In 2006, I was a nervous kid who knew no one, was known by no one, and was in awe of every famous player I'd seen on TV.

I can't claim to be a poker celebrity, but yesterday I got a taste of what that would be like. After waking early, going for a swim, having breakfast, and putting in some non-poker work at my computer, I made my first trip to the Rio. I wasn't going to play but to meet up with Bill Ordine, a reporter from my hometown paper, the Baltimore Sun, who is working on an article on poker and philanthropy. He'd already interviewed Barry Greenstein, who's known as “the Robin Hood of Poker” for donating over a million dollars in tournament winnings to a children's charity, and Annie Duke, who organized a $5000 buy-in charity tournament called Ante Up for Africa to coincide with the WSOP.

My own story is a little different. I've donated only a little more than 5% of my poker winnings to the non-profit organization that I founded, the Boston Debate League (BDL). My real contribution is all of the time and work that I put into it. Poker is what enables me to do that. I average 20-25 hours of work per week for each, and I make enough playing poker that I can afford to put that kind of time into the BDL.

It's great that Bill is doing this article, because poker sometimes gets a bad rap among the general public. People tend to believe, not entirely without reason, that poker encourages a cut-throat, every-man-for-himself mindset and that it rewards lying, treachery, and deceit. Hopefully an article in a major newspaper that focuses on the good that poker enables people to do will help to clean up that image.

Poker hasn't just given me the financial freedom to do “good work”. It's also taught me valuable skills that a liberal arts education did not. To paraphrase Ms. Duke, poker isn't fundamentally a game of lying, it's a game of pricing and negotiation. I do feel it's given me some business sense that has proven useful in meetings with foundations, prospective donors, the Boston Public Schools, and other individuals and institutions with which the BDL works.

Largely, the interaction between my poker “work” and my urban debate work has been a one-way street. That is, poker gave me the skills and financial freedom to grow the Boston Debate League, but the latter didn't do much for my poker game, except maybe making me feel less of a leech on society by gambling for a living.

Recently, however, that's started to change. In addition to playing, I now make money by coaching poker as well. Sometimes this is with individual students who pay me by the hour, but I also work for a video training site called Poker Savvy Plus. They pay me to record videos of myself playing or talking about poker and then offer these videos on a subscription basis to people who want to improve their game. My experience teaching debate and working with professional teachers has definitely made me a more successful and popular poker coach.

Yesterday, I got to meet my co-workers at Poker Savvy for the first time (in most cases- there were a few I already knew). But first, I had about an hour to kill between my interview with Bill and my meet-up with Poker Savvy. So, I headed down to the Amazon Room, the convention center at the Rio Hotel & Casino where the WSOP is held. I was hoping I might see someone I knew, but the odds were slim. Actually, the odds were good that I'd see someone I knew but slim that I'd recognize them. Since I play poker almost exclusively online, I plenty of people by their screen names but have no clue what most of them look like.

As luck would have it, though, I was spotted by my friend Richard almost immediately. Richard goes by Shorty both because of his last name is and because he is immensely tall. He was just starting a 20-minute break from a tournament he was playing, so I accompanied him for a quick bite at the WSOP Poker Kitchen while he told me how things had been going for him so far in Las Vegas. Mostly he raved about how soft and juicy the side games were and asked what I was planning on playing.

I told him the truth, which is that I had exactly $10,000 in cash on me, which I needed to buy into the main event. My plan was to play $5/$10 or $10/$25 games, hope for the best, and then find a Bank of America (there are none on the Strip, so I'd have to take a cab there and back) to withdraw more if I didn't win. Shorty told me that he was leaving town that night and would be happy to lend me some cash since he wouldn't need it. We exchanged phone numbers so that we could meet up when he was finished playing that night, and then he got back to his tournament.

I wandered around for a bit longer and then headed up to the suite in the Rio that Cardplayer magazine had converted into a studio for the duration of the WSOP. This is where I'd be meeting everyone else from Poker Savvy to record a roundtable Q&A session where we discussed poker topics submitted by Cardplayer readers.

Since I arrived about fifteen minutes early, I had some time to hang out with the Cardplayer crew, including the main reporters/hosts for their internet content: Shawn Green and Lizzie Harrison. Those of you who follow the poker scene may know these two, and those of you who don't probably won't be surprised to learn that Lizzie is an attractive and buxom twenty-something. Her looks have earned her a bit of a cult following on internet poker forums, and I can assure you that she is at least twice as hot in real life. But she, Shawn, and the rest of the Cardplayer crew were also very down to earth and fun to shoot the breeze with.

After about twenty minutes, the other Poker Savvy people started to arrive: Justin “Jurollo” Rollo, Dani “Ansky” Stern, Isaac “Ike” Haxton, Chris “Tribefan” Rhodes, Tony “Bond18” Dunst, and some of the behind-the-scenes guys. We took our seats and waited for the star of the show, Mike “The Mouth” Matusow, to join us during his break from the Ante Up for Poker tournament.

For those who don't know, Mike is, to understate the matter, a character. Though he's had tremendous success as a poker player, winning multiple WSOP bracelets and several six-figure prizes, he's also lost a lot of money to compulsive gambling and spent some time in jail for possession of cocaine. He's called “The Mouth” because he talks non-stop at the table, often berating his opponents' play, singing his own praises, or just generally calling attention to himself.

Lately, he's made some impressive gains in getting himself together. In the last year, he's dropped over sixty pounds, motivated by a $100,000 prop bet to get from 241 lbs down to 179. Just recently, he won his third WSOP bracelet in the $5000 rebuy 2-7 single draw rebuy event.

So we are all sitting in front of the cameras and waiting for Mike when suddenly there is a loud thump on the door. Someone opens it, and The Mouth comes crashing into the suite like a stampeding rhinoceros. “You all wouldn't believe how f---ing fast I f---ing ran to get up here,” he pants, nostrils flared. “Let's do it! Let's go! Let's get this thing f---ing started!” he shouts, clapping his hands. He takes the last available seat, which is in the back.

I'm wondering if the most famous guy here shouldn't be seated more prominently, but it turns out not to matter, because Mike makes himself the center of attention no matter what. He fields the first question enthusiastically and then interrupts whomever is speaking when he decides he has something to add. When he isn't shouting over us, he is gesticulating wildly to the people off-camera that he has to go in a minute or that he would like a bottle of water. We pass it to him, and he consumes the entire thing in a single ten-second chug, then tosses it haphazardly aside.

I don't imagine that much strategy content slipped past Mike's antics, but the clip should at least be good for comedic value. It doesn't appear to be up on Cardplayer's website yet, but I'll let you know when it is.

After the taping, we went out for drinks sans Mike. Truthfully, an afternoon with a bunch of internet poker players is not generally something I'd look forward to. Most are brash, self-absorbed, whiny, and otherwise annoying. But I must say that to a person, my co-pros at Poker Savvy were a great bunch. They are all very successful at poker and have a lot to brag about, but they don't come across as stuck up or anything, and they have some good stories.

For the full-time professionals, the WSOP is a magical time of year. Groups of guys, from four to ten or more, rent palatial houses in Las Vegas and spend weeks playing poker and partying their asses off. I don't think any of the best stories were intended for public consumption, but you can probably imagine the sort of debauchery that a bunch of guys in their early twenties with way too much money can get up to in Las Vegas. I'm only a few years older than most of them, but that whole lifestyle has never really been my scene. There are times when I feel little pangs of regret and a sense that I could be living a seriously crazy life, but for the most part it doesn't appeal to me. I do love hearing the stories, though.

We left the bar around seven, and I got a ride back to the Rio. I'd had only one drink in anticipation of putting in some hours at the tables that night. As I was waiting for a seat to open up, I ran into Shorty again. He had just been eliminated from his tournament and was going to go pack his bags then bring me some cash before leaving for the airport.

About an hour later, I was seated in a tight but not particularly tough 10/25 game when I spotted Shorty wandering the cash game section. I stood up and waved to catch his attention, played one more hand, then walked away from the table for a minute to speak with him. “Here's $7500,” he greeted me, handing me a roll of $100 bills. I pocketed it as he shared some intel on players at my table whom he'd played with in the last few days, then I wished him a good flight and returned to my game.

This really underscores the value of reputation in the poker community. I've known Shorty for about three years online, but we've met only two or three times in real life. Yet, just as a favor, he's willing to lend me $7500 in cash on the understanding that I'll send him a check when I get back to Boston. It's just a reality of high stakes poker that people often need access to large sums of cash, and now to money on various online poker sites as well, and it's infinitely easier to manage the logistics of moving this money among friends than to deal with the hassle and expense of wire transfers, getting to an off-Strip bank, or withdrawing from an ATM.

Poker friends can also help you raise money by staking you in a juicy game that's beyond your bankroll. They reduce your risk by putting up some of the money you need. Then if you lose, they eat the loss, and if you win, they get a cut. In fact, I was up on the WSOP before I even got to Las Vegas as a result of buying 10% of a friend who has had a phenomenal run, making two final tables.

Of course there are scumbags who take advantage of people, borrow money they can't or won't pay back, and rip off their investors. But reputation spreads quickly, and these people can quickly be cut off from the world of poker financing. Because I have been an active and ethical member of the poker community for several years, I know many people who would lend me money in a pinch, stake me for nearly any tournament I wanted to play, or help me transfer funds between online poker sites. And there are plenty of people for whom I would do the same.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 27, 2008

June

Hey, a winning month! Maybe I am not so bad at this game after all. There are still a few days to go, but I probably won't be playing much if at all. As you may have noticed, I haven't been playing the last few days either. I leave for Las Vegas on July 1st, and once out there I'll obviously be devoting quite a lot of time to poker, so I'm buckling down now on some of my other projects.

Granted I'm about to turn around and spend all of June's winnings in Las Vegas, but I was going to play the main event anyway, so the winnings are still very meaningful. And if you count staking profits, June turns into a damn fine month.

I was playing smaller stakes, though deep-stacked, and ran at about 4 BB/100 over 19K hands.

Non-poker stuff, which is where I devoted a lot of my time, is going great as well. The school system is really excited about the debate league and committed to investing in it, and we're very close to hiring an extremely qualified new director. I wish I had a bit more time for poker, but as I said, the first part of July will be dedicated to it, and once there's a paid employee working on the debate stuff, I should have more free time as well.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, June 23, 2008

WSOP Here I Come!

After spending more than enough money to buy in directly, I finally won a freaking main event seat in one of the last $650 satellites Stars will be running. Counting the spending money and sponsorship deal that comes with the package, I think that I ended up breaking even on satellites almost to the dollar.

It wasn't a particularly interesting tournament, but I did make one tight fold fairly early on. I raised QQ UTG, and the BB min-re-raised me. I didn't have quite the right odds to chase a set, but I called anyway and then folded when he bet half his stack on a ragged flop. Obviously I'm not 100% sure I was beat, and the guy did turn out to be a pretty aggressive player, but I still have my doubts about just how wide his range is for min-re-raising an UTG raise.

I also found myself folding both AK and KK preflop much later in the tournament, but those were actually trivially easy situations. In both cases I had a safe stack, we were one player away from the bubble, and there was a massive chipleader open shoving every hand. There was just no reason to get involved, even with AA.

Speaking of which, here was an interesting spot that I saw at another table on the bubble:

Poker Stars, $615 + $35 NL Hold'em Tournament, 3,500/7,000 Blinds, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: 42,162
UTG+1: 52,824
UTG+2: 56,370
MP1: 88,111
MP2: 84,791
CO: 12,672
BTN: 169,828
SB: 18,412
BB: 59,926

Pre-Flop: (16,800)
5 folds, CO raises to 11,972 and is All-In, BTN calls 11,972, SB folds, BB calls 4,972

Flop: (45,716) T 8 8 (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

Turn: (45,716) 6 (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

River: (45,716) T (3 Players - 1 is All-In)
BB checks, BTN checks

Results: 45,716 Pot
CO showed A A (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON 22,858 (+10,186 NET)
BTN mucked and LOST (-12,672 NET)
BB showed A A (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON 22,858 (+10,186 NET)


It's to the BB's credit that he played this correctly. I think a lot of people would have reshoved with AA there, but he's much better guaranteeing that the BTN goes to showdown and increasing the odds of the short stack getting eliminated.

Feels good to win this, because now I don't have to waste time and effort booking a hotel, finding someone to pay me to wear their clothing, etc. Just nice to have all that stuff taken care of.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Happy Father's Day

My dad keeps up with the blog, so I figured I'd make a post to wish him a Happy Father's Day. I didn't see him today, since he's in Maryland and I'm in Boston, but he'll be coming out to Las Vegas for the WSOP as he has for the last two years. After my first day (1C), we're going to Bryce Canyon for two nights before I (hopefully) play Day 2B. Happy Father's Day, dad.

On the same theme, here's a great story about being a father from 2+2 poster "Marlow":
In the months leading up the birth of my daughter, just about everyone who had the chance told me that my life was going to change. Of course they were right, but it's interesting that no one ever asserted that I was going to change. Beyond the impact my daughter has had on my sleep schedule, ability to play cards, drink, watch football, and travel - the greatest changes have all been to my personality and outlook. Before, I was a walking existential crisis. So much of my life was devoted to exploring my place in the world, and what the whole "meaning of life" is. But after she arrived, I stopped asking these questions. I'm no longer tortured by all of that. I’m satisfied. I can't say that I know definitively what the meaning of life is, but my need to ask the question of myself and the world has ceased completely.

Anyway, I have a story I'd like to share. Yesterday my daughter turned 3. In addition to the books, toys, and other presents that we've given her, we also let her choose where we ate dinner. She decided on ice cream first, then miso soup and sushi at the Japanese restaurant next door. She loves this place because not only does she love the food, but they have a small pond with dozens of koi fish in the middle of the room. She can walk right up to the pond and peer over the side to watch the fish swim up to her in the hope that they'll be fed. For a 3 year-old, this is the best. As an added bonus, she usually meets and plays with other kids who are there, too. So last night she's there looking at and talking to the fish when three older (probably 5 years old) boys came over to the pond and start to blow on the fish as they swim by. Clearly the fish did not like this. When they were blown on, they'd quickly swim off. The boys, being boys, were delighted that they were able to agitate these creatures. My daughter watched this for a minute or so, and I could almost see her thought process: "They are older, so should I do this too? The fish don't like this, though - and I like the fish. I don't know what to do." But then she made her decision for the welfare of the fish. So she marched over to these three kids who were significantly bigger than she was and started saying "don't blow on those fish!" over and over. They paid no attention, and after a few minutes, she came back to me exasperated. I suggested that she ask more politely. Of course, I knew that this would have no effect on them, but I wanted her to keep trying, to keep doing what she thought was the right thing. I didn't want to step in and teach her that justice only happens when you turn to an authority figure. I wanted her to feel as though she could do something for a cause that was important to her. To her credit, she started to ask politely. Then they started laughing and mocking her. This only spurred her on. She was getting angry, and started slapping her knees and shouting "stop, stop, stop, blowing on those fishies!!" again and again.

At this point I'm practically in tears I'm so happy. She is demonstrating empathy for the fish. She's standing up for what she believes in, even though the boys must have been very intimidating to her, and she did not resort to violence when she became frustrated. Eventually, one of the boys started clapping aggressively close to her, and I had to step in to protect her and scold him. The kid's father then materialized and ushered him away. The episode ended, but my wife and I praised her for the rest of the night.

But this was one of the most incredible experiences of my life. I was and still am bursting with pride. To me, this is what parenthood and life is all about.

Labels: ,

Friday, June 13, 2008

Debate Updates

As some of you know, my poker playing for the last few years has supported not only myself but a debate league in the Boston Public Schools. It started as just a volunteer thing that I did with a few teachers, but we soon realized that it had potential to help a lot of students if we could make it better. The key to that has been getting the administration of BPS to take some ownership of it, so that it would become part of the school system and not just an outside program.

I'm very excited that after months of meetings, the superintendent and her staff have agreed to invest $50,000 in the League. This is actually less than I was hoping, but it's still a huge improvement from nothing and will hopefully get us a foot in the door. Everyone I've met in the administration has seemed genuinely taken with the program. Now we'll have access to data such as debaters' GPA and test scores (this will be part of our deal with BPS), the numbers will back up our claims about how participation in debate can improve confidence, academic achievement, critical thinking, literacy, etc. It seems very plausible to me that there could be debate teams in every high school in the city, and maybe middle schools as well, within ten years.

It's kind of sad that I'll probably be leaving Boston just as this thing really takes off. I'll still be involved as a member of the Board, but we're hiring a full time person to direct the League.

This afternoon, I attended an end-of-the-year banquet and awards ceremony for one of my debate teams. In addition to awards for all the debaters, they had one for me in honor of my last year as director. Though it was technically from the whole team, I know that the coach and one student in particular were behind it. These two are respectively among the most extraordinary of the dozens of teachers and hundreds of students I've worked with in my seven years in the urban debate field, and their respect means the world to me.

Here's the trophy, which I'm sure will become one of my most cherished possessions:


Actually the aforementioned student just found this blog recently. When she saw me today, the first thing she said was, "Hey I googled your name."

Uh oh, I know where this is going. "Yeah?"

"I didn't know about all that poker stuff."

"Yeah I don't really make a big deal about it at work."

"That's pretty neat. So you are like a beginner?"

"Uh, I didn't say that. Where'd you get that from?"

"Some article from the Baltimore Sun said it was like your second time or you made money for the second time or something."

"Yeah, my second time making money... at the world championships."

"Oh. That's pretty good."

And a close-up of the engraving:

Labels: , ,

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas

A few days ago, as part of our cross-country road trip, Emily and I spend the better part of a day in Little Rock, Arkansas. I found it to be quite an interesting place, kind of a hip and relatively liberal mecca in a region of the US often stereotyped as backwards and conservative. Presumably Bill Clinton's legacy and influence have something to do with this, but I imagine the man was equally a product of the place.

After setting up our tent, our first stop was a scenic overlook at a nearby state park. As we were doing our best to point a camera at ourselves blindly with one hand, another couple arrived and offered to take our picture. They were a 'classic' Arkansas couple: he a straggly white guy sporting a goatee and a Home Depot polo, she a slender black woman with a pronounced posterior, and both exceedingly friendly and polite.

The man asked where we were from, and after I gave him a brief synopsis, I asked if they lived around here. He positively swelled with pride and drawled, "Why, yes sir, we do!"

"You're lucky," I told him, nodding at the sprawling, tree-covered delta spread out below us. They both smiled and offered some suggestions of things to see in the area, most notably the Big Dam Bridge.

I mention their races because it reinforces something I've noticed in my limited time in the American South. Despite northern stereotypes about racist hillbillies, Southern cities seem to be a lot more socially integrated than those in the North. I've seen many more inter-racial couples or even just groups of friends having dinner or coffee together than I do in places like Boston or Chicago.

Then again, that's only half of the story. I've also heard it said that, "In the South, they don't care how close you get, as long as you don't get too big; in the North, they don't care how big you get, as long as you don't get too close." It may be that opportunities for higher-level education, employment, and economic success are harder for many blacks to come by in the South; I'm really not in a position to say. And of course the Klan is still alive and well in many Southern states. But issues of racial equality, justice, and segregation are very important to me, and I'm always particularly mindful of them when traveling in a new region or culture.

On that note, we also visited Central High School in Little Rock, which in 1957 was the site of a riot that attracted international attention. The Supreme Court had recently declared the racial segregation of public schools to be illegal, but when nine black students attempted to enter Central High School in September, they were turned away by the Arkansas National Guard on the orders of Governor Orval Faubus.

A federal judge then ordered the school integrated. Faubus withdrew the National Guard, but a crowd of over a thousand angry whites gathered to prevent the Little Rock Nine from entering the school. The mayor of Little Rock wrote President Eisenhower for help, and he responded by federalizing the Guard and sending 100 members of the 101st Airborne Division to support the local police in maintaining order. A violent riot ensued. The students were threatened, and many reporters were beaten.

Eventually, the riot ended and the Little Rock Nine did attend school that year, with the only senior among them becoming the first black student to graduate from Central High School. The next year, however, Governor Faubus closed the state's three high schools rather than proceed with their integration, and students of all colors were forced to find new schools.

It's sad but important to realize that this was not the work of one misguided governor or a small but loud minority of virulent segregationists. Even after closing down the public high schools altogether, a Gallup poll found that Faubus was one of the ten men most admired by Americans in 1958.

One thing I find interesting about the civil rights movement is the role that pictures and other forms of media coverage have played in its successes. The style of nonviolent resistance popularized by Gandhi and King relies heavily on appealing to the conscience, not only of the oppressors, but of the world at large. You may have seen this powerful image from the Little Rock riot before:


It's one thing to have a political disagreement about whether schools ought to be integrated. Personally, I don't consider it a matter, like tax cuts, on which reasonable people can disagree. But especially in that era it kind of was, and regardless, there is such a world of difference between disagreeing with the decision of a judge or politician and cursing, spitting at, and attacking children.

Here we see a crowd of angry adults who are both older and far more numerous than the teenagers trying to do nothing more than attend a school that the highest court in the land has told them they have the right to attend. A lone girl walks calmly and bravely past a mob driven wild by hate, epitomized by the sneer on one woman's face.

Images like these provoked a kind of moral crisis for white Americans. They were able to overlook or make excuses for the fear, mistrust, hatred, and racism that informed their own support for segregation. But an angry mob attacking children cannot be interpreted as anything but a moral failing of the highest order. Over time, images such as this forced many people to change their opinions and drop their support for many of the most overt forms of discrimination.

This creates an interesting phenomenon where a town like Little Rock, which once festered with racism, can in many ways end up being less racist, or at least more conscious of its enduring racism, than more progressive cities that never saw such a singularly explosive incident of racism.

The epilogue to the picture above is that the the two women, the black teenager and the sneering white woman, met at Central High forty years later to reconcile. There was another moving photo (I couldn't find it online) of them standing arm in arm. The white woman was in tears.

When a woman, and more broadly a city, is so dramatically confronted with her own racism and forced to acknowledge their wrongdoings, they can ultimately end up more sensitive to the issue and conscious of the need to work actively to overcome it. For the millions who witnessed the Little Rock spectacle and others like it on television, however, it can have the opposite effect: they externalize racism as a belief held by redneck hillbillies who are not at all like themselves. They are inclined to think that if they are not burning crosses or shouting racial epithets, then they are not part of the problem.

Later the same day, we passed through Memphis, but didn't have much time to spend there. That's a shame, because I really would have liked to have visited some of the civil rights sites there. It's a part of American culture that I find really interesting both historically and as a lesson for today. Despite the progress that has been made, so many of the problems targeted by the civil rights movement of the 50's and 60's, such as segregation and educational inequality, persist today. Yet there is no movement on the scale that there was 40-50 years ago. Why not? Which of those strategies can and should be revived? Which failed? Which need to be adapted for contemporary America?

If any of you have made it through this rant and want to hear yet more of what I have to say on the subject, you might be interested in my review of Jonathan Kozol's Savage Inequalities.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 16, 2008

I Knocked Out a Pro

I'd forgotten about this, but apparently I knocked an FTP pro out of some long ago tournament. Recently I got this t-shirt in the mail:

And here it is displayed along with my other trophies, an autographed picture of the toeker player I eliminated from the 2006 WSOP and my autographed copy of Ace on the River that I got from Barry Greenstein at the 2007 WSOP:

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

April

I'm taking tomorrow off, so I guess I just played my last hand for April. I put in about 20K hands over 50 hours this month. That's about half of my monthly goal, but this was a particularly busy month for the Boston Debate League (just under 100 hours): I was in Chicago for a few days for the UDL Nationals, then we had our City Championships as well.

The month got off to a rough start, but I recovered reasonable well. I ran at nearly 2 BB/100, but because my win rate was best at smaller stakes, I was actually in the red for the month, though not by a lot.

I played a touch of PLO and Stud/8, but not enough to be worth talking about. I will say though that I need to realize that those games require a lot more focus, both because I have a lot less experience in them and because there are fewer automatic decisions than in NLHE. Playing three tables of Stud/8 and talking on the phone is not going to work, even though that's no sweat at almost any stakes in NLHE (unless I'm playing HU).

Most importantly, I accomplished one of my New Year's Resolutions by getting affiliated with Poker Savvy Plus. My first three videos, which comprised a series on Flop Fundamentals, was well received, and it looks like I'll be doing some more.

April Graph:

Aren't I supposed to be winning money? Here's to a better May....

Labels: ,

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Sopranos Anti-Finale

This week I watched the second-to-last Sopranos, which I'd never seen, and re-watched the final episode. I recall going to considerable length to see the finale and being thoroughly disappointed, not just by the final seconds, but by the entire thing. Basically the whole season 6 (the part after the break, anyway) was boring. It constantly followed plots I didn't care about it and created new subplots (Tony's gambling) when I wanted them to be building to something.

As I said, I hadn't seen the second-to-last episode, and man did I love it. But there was so much good stuff rushed into one episode- it could have been expanded into a whole season.

The season should have opened with the Italians being flown in and killing the wrong guy. Then one or two episodes later, New York goes after Sylvio and Bobby. The whole season is full of feuding with Phil Leotardo. Tony kills Chris in a more climactic way. Throw an AJ episode in there somewhere, maybe one dedicated to Melfi "dumping" him, then in the second-to-last episode they learn Phil's location and have the meeting to flip his guy. Final episode opens with Phil's execution, then most of it is dedicated to Carlo going missing and the FBI getting grand jury testimony.

I've taken him this far. Now David Chase just needs to go back to the drawing board AND WRITE ME A FUCKING ENDING! No, I can't come up with anything better. That doesn't mean he shouldn't. I'm not the series creator- it's not my job.

I liked the rest of that episode better this time around. I really like what happened to AJ, I just wish they hadn't crammed it all into the last episode. The scene with Tony and Janice is one of the only scenes of hers that don't make me grit my teeth. It's the first and only time I understood the connection between the two of them and why Tony keeps supporting her.

The encounter with Junior was good, too. And Paulie with the cat was hysterical. "Those things are like snakes with fur."

But I'm still not happy with the ending. I just think his pretentious "commentary" on television went on for too long. He didn't need a precious little device to do that: the whole season was anti-climactic, highlighted by the treatment of Christopher's death. The gag ending was just a cheap shot, as far I'm concerned.

Go ahead, someone leave me a comment saying I didn't understand it. Tell me your deep thoughts about how "we got to feel how he has to live the rest of his in paranoia". Please.

Labels:

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Bryan Clark Owns

I don't know how he did it, but Bryan Clark (AKA Dynasty, the editor of 2+2 Magazine) managed to defuse Mason Malmuth's temper. In both our public and private communications, he gave no ground whatsoever and continued to insist that I deliberately misrepresented the Harrington on Cash series in my reviews. (For those who need the backstory on this, see my post from two days ago).

He was demanding a retraction, which I was obviously not going to do, and I was ready to give him a piece of my mind. I'm sure whatever I said would have closed the door on my ever writing for the magazine again, but that seemed like a fait accompli at that point anyway. However, Bryan convinced me to hold my tongue until he spoke with Mason again. I wasn't optimistic, but I let him do his thing, and boy did he ever come through. Apparently, though he still insists that my reviews misrepresent the contents of the books, Mason no longer believes that this was deliberate on my part and he is OK with my continuing to write for the magazine.

In his defense, Mason apparently did not know that Foucault the 2+2 poster was Andrew Brokos the magazine author. This makes it somewhat more reasonable for him to reach the conclusion that I had malicious intent in reviewing the books. Though I still don't think it's an appropriate conclusion for him to jump to, it's more understandable and I am no longer particularly insulted. I mostly just want the whole thing to blow over at this point, which seems to be his preference as well.

Except that he wants me to meet with him, Bryan, Dan Harrington, and Bill Robertie this summer when I'm in Vegas for the WSOP. Under different circumstances, that would be very cool, but since they all have good reason to be feeling antagonistic towards me, I'm pretty sure it's going to be uncomfortable.

But whatever, I wouldn't have put it in writing if I wasn't willing to defend it to the authors' faces. I do regret that the tone of the reviews was so hostile, but so far I haven't been convinced that any of my actual arguments are wrong. And I certainly owe it to Bryan to attend, assuming the meeting ever actually happens, because I get the sense that he stuck his neck out a bit to keep me on the magazine.

Though I asked him not to, I'm glad that he did. It's -EV, but I've enjoyed writing for the magazine anyway. Looks like I'll have an article in the May issue after all. Thanks Bryan.

Oh and I appreciate the support that you all have shown in the comments here and in the 2+2 thread, but please don't post in it now. Like I said, I want this to blow over. Thanks.

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 21, 2008

Mason is Upset

Mason Malmuth, the owner of Two Plus Two Publishing, was none too happy with the reviews of the Harrington on Cash Series that I posted on the 2+2 Forums. His responses were split roughly 50/50 between substantive rebuttals of particular critiques I made and personal attacks regarding my motivations. Though he was condescending and rude throughout, I found this passage particularly insulting:
At dinner with Dan and Bill, we actually discussed these reviews a little bit. The main question they had was why would someone so completely mis-characterize what was in the books, and then explain why so much was wrong. My answer was that if you can be the one who shows how Dan Harrington (and Bill Robertie as well as Two Plus Two Publishing) got it all wrong, you will achieve instant credibility as a poker expert who should be listened to.

I gave myself as an example of someone who over a period of well over 20 years produced a body of work that was there for anyone to evaluate. But many of these new writers, due to the fact that the poker boom is now, don't have 20 years (or more) to establish themselves. So they take this other path.
Given how long I have been contributing to the 2+2 forums and writing for 2+2 Internet Magazine, not to mention favorably reviewing other 2+2 books, this is both absurd and insulting. Technically my article for the May issue of the magazine is due on Friday, but at this point I'm not sure if I want to continue writing for them, nor if my submission would be welcome. At the moment, Mason has said he isn't going to "bother" responding to my defense of the review, but I wouldn't be surprised if he changes his mind on that. Or just bans me. Guess I'll see what happens in the next day or two and then make a decision.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Paul "UCLABruinz" Smith Wins Bellagio 2K

Paul Smith AKA UCLABruinz, shown here with his daughter (yes his head really is that huge), just took down a $2000 Bellagio prelim event for $203,495.

I've known Paul for a while through the 2+2 forums, but I first met him in real life at the 2006 WSOP. I was really impressed with him as both a poker player and a person, and I can't imagine a nicer, more deserving guy to win a big score like this. Except for me of course. But Paul is a notable exception to what I was just saying about how I don't like spending my time in the company of poker players.

On a recent episode of the 2+2 Pokercast, Eric "Sheets" Haber spoke about the difficulties of running a staking empire: managing your money well, determining how good a potential horse actually is, dealing with the inherent risks of deception and tilt on the part of your horses, etc. Paul, who has just made Eric a good deal of money, strikes me as the rare sure thing. He's undoubtedly a strong player and very reliable to boot. I just wish I had a Sheets-sized bankroll so that I could afford to put great players like Paul into the largest buy-in tournaments.

Way to go Paul! Very happy for you. Hopefully we can meet up again this summer.

Labels: , ,

I'm In the Kansas City Star

Last weekend, I accompanied several of my debaters to an urban debate league national championship in Chicago. As the director of the Boston Debate League, I rarely have the time (or inclination) to judge debates myself. However, I did judge a few rounds while in Chicago. In particular, I had the pleasure of judging a young man from Kansas City named Sean Easterwood (pictured at left with his coach, Jane Rinehart, and administrators from the Kansas City Urban Debate League).

Sean was one of the best speakers I've seen, and I've seen thousands. When Sean won top speaker at the tournament, I was not surprised. When a reporter from the Kansas City Star called me about an article he was writing on Sean, I was not surprised. (Well, I wasn't surprised that a reporter would do want to write an article about Sean. I was surprised that he had bothered to track down Sean's judges from the national championship).

I had trouble putting into words what exactly it was that I liked about Sean, which is rare for me, but the reporter did a nice job of turning my rambling into a coherent thought:

Thirty-four teams from 19 debate leagues across the nation battled it out in Chicago last weekend at the Chase Urban Debate National Championship. [Sean] earned a $2,500 scholarship for snaring the top individual award.

And he did it while attacking some of the hectic, rapid-fire tactics of debate even as he showed he could dominate that style, said judge Andrew Brokos.

“He was charismatic and principled,” Brokos said. “He had all the skills … to play within the game while getting the judges to acknowledge his criticism of the game.”

Judging Sean was also exciting for me because he debates for Kansas City Central, the debate team that was the subject of one of my favorite books, Cross-Ex. Even if I weren't deeply immersed in the world of urban debate leagues, I would have loved this white journalist's account of following, and eventually coaching, the largely black team as they "challenge[d] the debate community on race, power, and education."

Jane Rinehart, who coaches at Central and was one of the "stars" of the book, has apparently taken Sean into her home as well and is now his legal guardian. The article is pretty vague regarding what happened, but it sounds like his family just up and took off on him while he was away at a debate tournament:

That’s how, at 17, you bear the weight of having walked up the steps to your home after returning from another out-of-town tournament and finding the window blinds gone, the furniture gone…


This is my favorite thing about the urban debate league scene, and what makes it so different from poker. Virtually everyone I meet, both students and coaches/administrators, are extraordinary and inspiring people who have done, are doing, or surely will do great things. It's incredibly uplifting to spend time in their company. Compare that to the usual lineup at a 2/5 NL table at Foxwoods, and you'll understand why I don't enjoy live poker.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Poker Savvy Guest Videos


It was one of my goals for 2008 to make some videos for one of the major instructional sites, and it looks promising that I'll soon do a series for a Poker Savvy Plus. After getting invited by Justin Rollo, who is one of their teachers and who's known me from the 2+2 MTT forum for some time, I made a demo video this evening and spoke with one of the site's owners for a while about our ideas for a three video series that would serve as a sort of introduction to mid-stakes NLHE 6-max cash games.

After making a video myself, I have a new appreciation for the people who do it regularly. It's remarkably difficult to play poker, think, and talk coherently about your thinking all at the same time. Even playing just two tables, I couldn't do it. I ended up recording the video of myself playing on four tables and then went back afterwards and added audio commentary. I'm very happy with the final result, but my voice is pretty tired from all that talking.

All in all, I'm excited to be working with the Poker Savvy folks. They've got some great people already on staff or as guest instructors who are both strong players and friends of mine, including Justin Rollo (Jurollo/WPTHero), Dani Stern (Ansky), and Tony Dunst (Bond18/muckthenuts). Oh and Mike Matusow. Although they're one of the younger instructional sites, they've got an awesome stable and some promising ideas for new types of videos. I'm looking forward to being a part of it.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, March 31, 2008

March

Oooph. Man I feel like I just got brutalized all month, but the truth is that I was nearly even until about 10 days ago, and then things really hit the skids. It was some combination of running bad, getting frustrated, and once finding myself in an expensive game with a player who may have been better than I thought.

On the plus side, I got in a lot of hands this month, nearly 38K. Unfortunately, I ran at -1 BB/100, which combined with a continued failure to thrive in tournaments, resulted in my worst month ever. It was enough to wipe out the gains of February and then some. I haven't added in my rakeback yet, and hopefully that will be substantial, but either way I've got some rebuilding to do.

Also, I played NLHE cash games almost exclusively, so I'm not going to bother with PLO or tournament stats or anything. I'm now just under 2 BB/100 for the year, which isn't great, but still means I'm making decent money given the stakes I'm playing. I'm at about 80% of where I wanted to be for the year, but honestly if I continue at this pace for the rest of 2008, I'd have no room to complain. Downswings are always frustrating when you're in them, but my big picture is still bright, so I try to focus on that. Here's my really swingy graph for the first quarter of the year:

Labels: ,

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Grand Canyon Pictures

Last month, my girlfriend and I spent a few days at the Grand Canyon. I know most of you probably don't care, but for those of you who know me or who enjoy looking at pictures of other peoples' vacations, here are some pictures:



Here I am standing on an icy precipice. We tried to do some hiking, but even with crampons, the ice made the already-treacherous paths even more harrowing. Also, people share trails with mules, which means that often there was no way to avoid trudging through a sludge of partially melted snow mixed with mud and mule poop. That was kind of unpleasant.




Here's one of the trails zig-zagging across one wall of the canyon. We went maybe 10-15% of the way down, but the full hike is kind of an ordeal. You have to spend the night in the canyon, as they are very insistent that you cannot make it down and back in one day.


This is the cabin where we stayed. Hopefully you can tell how close it was to the rim. We didn't actually have a rim view, though, because there was another cabin in the way. Those were all booked, unfortunately.



Some nice but kind of weird family took our picture.

Labels:

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Ship It

Two exciting deliveries arrived yesterday. The first was my new laptop. My old machine was going on five years and pathetic at handling all my poker applications. Also the screen was so lame compared to my dual monitor wide-screen desktop set-up. The new computer has a 17" screen, which will make it a little more awkward to carry than is ideal for a laptop but will make the multi-tabling much more manageable. It's pretty thin, too, which is sexy. Here it is alongside my desktop set-up:


My poker library is visible in the background of this one:


And the other new arrival:


Hopefully I'll have a review of Volume I up by the end of the week. I'm out of town until Thursday, probably won't be updating the blog, but I will have a lot of time for reading and writing.

Labels: ,

RIUDL Banquet

I was in Providence Wednesday night for the Rhode Island Urban Debate League's end of the year banquet. It was a powerful event marked by three highlights: speeches from Providence mayor David Cicilline, Great Debaters star Nate Parker, and the graduating seniors of the RIUDL. Perhaps the biggest story, though, was the amazing turnout. Dozens of students and coaches brought their families and were joined by League supporters, school district officials, and Brown University students who work with the League. The overwhelming turnout even forced a last minute change of venue to a larger ballroom at the Westin Providence. The Providence Journal and the Brown Daily Herald covered the event.

Mayor Cicilline spoke briefly but eloquently about the importance of debate and the history of the Rhode Island Urban Debate League. Though he's new to office, he seems to have had a long-standing relationship with the League. To say that I'm jealous would be an understatement.

Then, a young woman named Rosanna Castro gave awards and introduced the RIUDL's graduating seniors. Rosanna was one of the League's first debaters, and since graduating in 2004, she has gone on to join the school board. We've got some strong allies on the Boston School Committee, but once again, jealousy ensued as I listened to this bright, articulate, confident young woman credit so much of her success to debate.

The seniors had similar stories to tell. The Boston Debate League did two joint events with the RIUDL this year, so I've gotten to know some of their students a bit. It was moving to watch them pondering such an emotional milestone as graduation and reflecting on an activity that has meant so much to them. Some read from carefully prepared speeches, others reveled in hamming it up on the fly, and still others giggled nervously through quick thank yous to their coaches and teammates. But always, they acknowledged that were it not for joining the debate team, they would never be able to speak so eloquently before a crowd of hundreds.

The real show-stopper was Nate Parker, who starred alongside Denzel Washington in The Great Debaters. Now this was a guy to be jealous of. Nate is young, handsome, charismatic, smart, articulate, well-informed, successful, and presumably pretty well-off financially these days.
Experiencing so much success as a young man and being tapped by one of the most popular and talented actors and directors in America to star in his film is the kind of thing that would go to most people's heads, especially those who spend so much time in Hollywood. But Nate seems down-to-Earth and genuinely passionate about debate. Though he was unfamiliar with the activity prior to starring in the film, Parker now describes debate as "a major step in leveling the playing field" for disadvantaged students. He's since traveled the country to attend several other urban debate events.

Needless to say, he's a big hit with the students. After speaking for a few minutes, he invited the audience to come up on stage and ask him questions. Not surprisingly, several giggling girls were the first to take him up on the offer.

When asked about the upcoming presidential election, he gave a characteristically thoughtful response. "I really wanted to approach this with an open mind. I didn't, you know, want to just say 'Oh I'm for the black guy!' I've read all the candidates' books and I've never missed one of the debates. But after taking it all in, I'm supporting Obama." That line was met with thunderous applause.

I'm usually skeptical of celebrities who want to pontificate about politics, and this country certainly doesn't have the best track record with actors-turned-politicians. But I couldn't help thinking what a great candidate and great leader Parker would make.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Massachusetts Rally Update


On Tuesday, I posted about a rally I attended at the Massachusetts State House to protest a provision of Governor Patrick's casino legislation that made playing poker online a felony punishable by up to $25,000 and/or two years in jail. I'm happy to report that the committee holding a hearing on the bill that day did not recommend it to the full Congress and that, when it did come to the floor, the bill was voted down.

Professor Charles Nesson of Harvard Law School, who has been trying to determine who or what interests are pushing this anti-internet gambling language, has it from Governor Patrick's mouth that the source of this provision is Attorney General Coakley.

The Poker Players' Alliance now has some links to news coverage of the rally and some pictures up on their site, including the one above, of the Poker Prison prop that I mentioned on Tuesday. Here's a good group shot, I'm on the left towards the back in the black and white hat:

Labels: , ,

Saturday, March 1, 2008

February

Best month ever!

At that start of the year, I set some year-long poker goals for myself. So far I've played too many tournaments and not enough hours, but my hourly rate has been so good that I'm getting by anyhow.

I averaged 17 hours a week, only 2/3 of my goal. However, despite playing so many FTOPS tournaments, I put in about 25,000 hands of NLHE. Some of them were full ring, but I am still in good shape for my goal of 250,000 short-handed hands in 2008. My win rate was only about 2 PTBB/100 for the month, but when the BB is sometimes as high as $100, that adds up.

At Omaha, on the other hand, I played about 1500 hands and had an 8PTBB/100 win rate.

I played 41 tournaments, cashing only for a pittance in the two freerolls that I played. I honestly think that I've gotten worse at tournaments as I've gotten better at cash games. I'm just accustomed to more loose and aggressive play than one sees in most tournaments, and to playing with deeper stacks, and I'm not making the right adjustments. I'm also losing a lot of coin flips.

I've played a few hands here and there of Stud/8, mostly at 10/20. I'm feeling very good about my game there, and hopefully I'll get a chance to play one of the WSOP events. I think that would be fun, if less profitable than just playing the side games.

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Back from the Grand Canyon

I'm just back from three wonderful days at the Grand Canyon with Emily. It really is an amazing place. I'd been once before, about fifteen years ago, but didn't remember too much about it. We took a lot of pictures, some of which I'll post here soon, but trite as this sounds, they don't do it justice.

The Grand Canyon isn't the most beautiful or picturesque or captivating of the many canyons to be found in the American Southwest. It's simply the biggest. To appreciate it, then, there's really no alternative to standing on its rim, looking thousands of feet straight down to the canyon floor and out across of miles of gullies and plateaus.

One gets a sense, not only of its great physical proportions, but of the extraordinary expanse of time it embodies. To see the tiny (from a distance) Colorado river and imagine it carving this vast canyon inch by inch is literally mind-boggling. Conceptually, one can envision the river carrying away bits of sediment, eventually triggering large landslides in which tons of shale collapsed into the emerging pit, but it's impossible to contain within the human brain a true sense of the hundreds of millions of years required to produce this magnificent landscape.

As a species, we have difficulty pondering even much shorter time-scales. The current controversy about global warming and the consequences that our actions today may have in the future demonstrates how poorly we incorporate even the next few human generations into our moral calculus. In all likelihood, human civilization will run its course and fade from the memory of the universe and, despite the frantic work of the Colorado, the Grand Canyon will appear to the last set of human eyes to gaze upon it indistinguishable from the way it looks to me today. There is nothing like staring into this geological abyss to remind you of your own impermanence and that of your entire species.

Labels: ,

Sunday, February 24, 2008

God It's Great to Be Good at Poker

I recently came across this pretty amusing collection of quotes about why work sucks. The one they ranked 10th was actually my favorite and comes from one of my favorite writers:

“It was true that I didn’t have much ambition, but there ought to be a place for people without ambition, I mean a better place than the one usually reserved. How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 6:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?”
—Charles Bukowski, Factotum, Black Sparrow Press, 1975

Labels:

In Vegas, For a Vacation From Gambling

I flew into Las Vegas last night for a hastily scheduled vacation. I may be the only person in the world who comes here in order to take a break from gambling. This afternoon, Emily and I are leaving for three nights at the Grand Canyon. That means I likely won't be updating the blog for a few days. Unlike some fancier blogging platforms, Blogger doesn't allow me to 'trickle' out posts by backdating them to publish automatically at a future date. So today, I'm going to make 4-5 posts that I've had in the hopper for a while, and you loyal readers can decide for yourselves whether you'd rather binge and read them all at once or just read one a day and pretend I am still updating regularly.

Labels:

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Suspected Poker Cheats Murdered

The Gainesville Sun reports that
Jerome Anthony Henry, 48, of Seville, and Richard David Smith and Robert Erwin Ford, both 50 and from Palatka, were killed inside the structure, a former bar that officers said people had been using as the location for a "high-stakes" poker game.

All four men had been involved in the game, which started Friday afternoon and continued through the night, said Sheriff's Office spokesman Major Keith Riddick.

Crittenden had been in the game and lost, officers reported.

"We understand that he felt that they were cheating, and he went back apparently to confront them about that," Riddick said.

This is one of the reasons I've generally stayed away from private games, despite the stories I've heard about how great they can be. There's always an increased risk that you're being cheated, but if you win, there's also the chance that some shady character is going to think you cheated. Or just rob the place. Or that the game will be busted by the cops. I'd rather remain in the safety of my home and play tougher, smaller stakes games online- but play eight of them once!

Labels: ,

Sunday, February 10, 2008

I Prefer to Walk

I like to walk, and I liked it even more when I was in high school, so I didn't think much of it when George (not his real name) told me he was late because he chose to walk. George was one of the students coming on a Boston Debate League trip to Rhode Island yesterday. He was supposed to meet us at 7:45 AM at Copley Square, the first of three train stations where our chartered bus would be picking up participants.

At 7:44, he was nowhere in sight, so I called his brother's cell phone, which he was borrowing for the day. "What's going on, George?" I asked, trying to give the impression that I was pretending, but only kinda pretending, to be annoyed. In other words, he wasn't in trouble yet, but he had better get his ass in gear.

"Sorry, I had to walk. I'm on my way."

"How far away are you?"

"Five or six minutes."

"Alright. Feel free to run."

Fifteen minutes later, the other latecomers had arrived, but George was still nowhere in sight. I called him again. "You told me five minutes."

"Sorry, I'm almost there. I'm on Stuart Street. I've been running."

"Stuart and what?"

"I'm almost there. Two minutes."

"Hurry." At the first of three bus stops, we were already twenty minutes behind schedule, and I hate being late.

George did indeed appear two minutes later, sweating despite the chilly air of a winter morning, out of breath, and with tie disheveled. "Sorry," he panted while climbing the stairs of the bus.

"Where were you walking from?"

"Ruggles."

"You live over that way?"

"Yeah."

"You could have just taken the Green Line here. Or taken the Orange to Forest Hills, that's where we're going next."

"Walking is faster," he muttered, eyes fixed on the seat in front of him.

"There's no way that's true," I told him, but let the matter slide.

*************************

In part because we were late to arrive, we left Rhode Island nearly an hour later than planned, and it was well after dark as the bus approached Boston. "Where you getting off, George?" I asked him as we pulled into Forest Hills.

"Copley. I'll walk from there."

"I'd rather you didn't." He wouldn't be walking through a particularly dangerous neighborhood, for the most part, but just in general I didn't like the idea of releasing a teenager from my custody into the street alone after dark. "Why don't you get off here and take the Orange line."

"I prefer to walk."

"Alright," I said with a resigned shrug.

Thankfully, a teacher sitting across from me was a bit more savvy. "You mean you prefer not to pay for the train?"

"Um... yeah," he admitted, a bit embarrassed.

For me, the $1.70 train fare is a trivial expense. Sometimes I choose to walk because it is a nice day or because I feel like it, but the cost of the train is never a consideration.

Although this isn't the first time it's been brought to my attention that a kid from a low-income family doesn't think this way, I don't generally pay for kids' train fare. The thing is that I pay for a lot of other stuff. At a typical tournament, I'm buying breakfast and lunch for the participants and paying for the awards we give at the end of the day, not to mention volunteering my time to organize and run the event. So even though I know that the cost of transportation can be a real barrier to participation, I usually leave that cost to the kids anyway. If they want to debate badly enough, I figure, they can find a way to come up with train fare no matter how broke they are.

But now I was faced with a new realization. George enjoys debating, and I had no doubt that if he had to take the train, he would have come up with the money. In other words, it wasn't a matter of him not caring enough about participating to make the necessary sacrifices. But if there was any way for him to do both, to come to Rhode Island and avoid paying $3.40 for train fare, he was going to do it, even if it meant bookending a long and demanding day with a mile and a half walk through the cold to and from the bus stop. And there was nothing I could do but blush, hand him $2, and thank him for coming.

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 7, 2008

FTOPS Event 2

Grrrrrrrr I missed the PLO Bounty event, I didn't realize it was an afternoon tournament. The $500 HORSE is tonight, so that's what I'll be playing instead.

Labels: , ,

Monday, February 4, 2008

January

At that start of the year, I set some year-long poker goals for myself. One month into 2008, I'm pretty much on track, though it's close and there's plenty of room for improvement. I averaged only about 16 hours of playing per week, well short of my goal of 25. However, it was a very full month for the Boston Debate League, which took up closer to 25 hours of my time each week, and I don't expect always to be that busy.

I played about 22,000 hands of NLHE, which puts me on par for my goal of 250,000 in 2008. However, a fair number of these were full ring, which weren't supposed to count. Unfortunately, I don't have an easy of disaggregating them, since Poker Tracker groups full ring games on Full Tilt with short-handed games on Ultimate Bet.

With results like what I saw in January (not sustainable, unfortunately), I wouldn't need to play anywhere near that number of hours or hands, though. I earned better than 6 PTBB/100 for the month, which at the higher stakes games is definitely well above my true win rate.

My goal of improving my Pot Limit Omaha game is not coming along so well. Over 2000 hands (a minuscule sample, especially for a high-variance game like PLO), mostly at 3/6, I was at -10 PTBB/100. I did read Jeff Hwang's Pot Limit Omaha: The Big Play Strategy, though, and I think that will help me improve my game in the coming months.

I played 25 tournaments, which should bring me in under my cap of 400 for the year, though FTOPS VII begins tomorrow night, and that will likely see me playing more tournaments in February.

Overall, it was a great month, topped only by July and November of last year, both of which were marked by big tournament wins. My central goal for 2008 was to focus on NLHE cash games over tournaments, which until recently had been my bread-and-butter, so it's great to see my new game of choice delivering comparable results so quickly.

Labels: ,

Saturday, January 26, 2008

My Interview With WJMN

It's got nothing to do with poker. But WJMN, a Boston hip hop station, recently interviewed me and a few students from the Boston Debate League. I'm only going to post my portion of it here, which is about 10 minutes long. I was very happy with how it came out, which surprised me, because I've generally never liked the way my voice sounds on tape.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Ich bin eine deutsche Berühmtheit

2+2 Internet Magazine recently cut a deal with a German poker website called PokerOlymp that allows them to publish German translations of articles initially written for 2+2. This is great for us authors because whenever they choose one of our articles, we get an extra $100 for no additional work! Plus, they still have limited rights to the articles, meaning that they have exclusive right to use them for three months, and then the rights revert back to us and we can re-sell them or post them on our websites. So my December article, The Myth of Any Two Cards, is now available in German!

Labels: ,

Rural Schools

While reading a relatively unrelated opinion piece in today's New York Times, I was reminded of a comment left by Jen on one of my recent Savage Inequalities posts. She asked whether Kozol addressed the question of inequality between states and pointed me to the condition of schools in her native South Carolina, where her mother is a public school teacher. I'll address that in a moment, but first, here's Bob Herbert on South Carolina's rural schools:

"If you were to walk into some of those schools — which are spread along a crescent-shaped corridor on either side of Interstate 95 from the southern edge of North Carolina to the northern edge of Georgia — you might forget that you were in the United States.

A former South Carolina commerce secretary, Charles Way, talks in the film about the time his car broke down near one of these schools and he went inside to use a phone.

“I just couldn’t really believe my eyes,” he said. “It was the most deplorable building condition that I’ve ever seen in my life. How the hell somebody could teach in an environment like that is really just beyond me.”

Among many other problems, ancient plumbing has resulted in raw sewage backing up into some schools, bringing in vermin and unbearable odors. The first school profiled in “Corridor of Shame” was built in 1896.

Some 700,000 students attend these rural schools, and they are being left behind in droves. One principal complained about nonfiction books in the school library that dated back to the 1940s and ’50s, including a volume that promised “one day man will land on the moon.”

The rural schools in South Carolina are symptoms of a much wider problem. Only about 50 percent of the state’s children graduate from high school."

Inter-state disparity in education funding isn't something that Kozol addresses, and my guess as to why is that public education is a right enshrined at the state rather than the federal level. Unlike the federal constitution, all 50 state constitutions make some provision for public education. When the US constitution has been applied to education, it's generally been via the 14th amendment's prohibition against any individual state's inequitable provision of a right, privilege, or public good. In other words, the US constitution does not guarantee citizens a public education, but it does guarantee that if your state chooses to provide public education, that it must do so equitably.

This is why the scheme of funding public education through local property taxes is so disingenuous. It is a right provided at the state level, yet in fulfilling this obligation, states delegate its provision to local governments in a way that guarantees funding disparities.

There are plenty of good reasons for local control of education that have nothing to do with racism or the perpetuation of inequality, but it is surely naive to think that those latter factors have nothing to do with the local funding scheme. Many school districts have been gerrymandered specifically to isolate a wealthy enclave, ensuring that its resources go only to its own children and often that its school stay largely white as a result.

These sometimes arbitrary school district lines are what enabled the "white flight" that followed the Supreme Court's Brown decision and the subsequent attempts to desegregate public schools. White families could keep their children in segregated schools by moving out of diverse urban school districts and into largely white suburbs. In a case called Milliken v. Bradley, the Court protected this strategy by holding that students could not be forced to desegregate across district lines.

The final chapter of Kozol's book is built around the Supreme Court's 1973 decision in San Antonio v. Rodriguez that intrastate disparities in funding for public education do not constitute actionable discrimination. Once again, the familiar canards of the "adequate" education and the indirect correlation between money and quality rear their ugly heads:

"The argument here is not that the children in districts having relatively low assessable property values are receiving no public education; rather, it is that they are receiving a poorer quality education than that available to children in districts having more assessable wealth. Apart from the unsettled and disputed question whether the quality of education may be determined by the amount of money [411 U.S. 1, 24] expended for it, 56 a sufficient answer to appellees' argument is that, at least where wealth is involved, the Equal Protection Clause does not require absolute equality or precisely equal advantages. 57 Nor, indeed, in view of the infinite variables affecting the educational process, can any system assure equal quality of education except in the most relative sense. Texas asserts that the Minimum Foundation Program provides an "adequate" education for all children in the State. By providing 12 years of free public-school education, and by assuring teachers, books, transportation, and operating funds, the Texas Legislature has endeavored to "guarantee, for the welfare of the state as a whole, that all people shall have at least an adequate program of education. This is what is meant by `A Minimum Foundation Program of Education.'"
In their dissent, Justices Marshall and Douglass point out the inherent inequality of local property tax as a funding mechanism for public education:

"It is clear, moreover, that the disparity of per-pupil revenues cannot be dismissed as the result of lack of local effort - that is, lower tax rates - by property-poor districts. To the contrary, the data presented below indicate that the poorest districts tend to have the highest tax rates and the richest districts tend to have the lowest tax rates. 12 Yet, despite the apparent extra effort being made by the poorest districts, they are unable even to begin to match the richest districts in terms of the production of local revenues. For example, the 10 richest districts studied by Professor Berke were able to produce $585 per pupil with an equalized tax rate of 31› [411 U.S. 1, 76] on $100 of equalized valuation, but the four poorest districts studied, with an equalized rate of 70› on $100 of equalized valuation, were able to produce only $60 per pupil. 13 Without more, this state-imposed system of educational funding presents a serious picture of widely varying treatment of Texas school districts, and thereby of Texas schoolchildren, in terms of the amount of funds available for public education."
In other words, school districts with a lower property base do not even have the option of providing an education on the order of what their wealthier counterparts can offer. Contrary to the popular claim that education is somehow undervalued in poor and/or minority communities, these districts often allocate larger portions of their income to education than do their suburban counterparts. However, a smaller chunk of the much higher suburban property base still goes a lot further. Justices Marshall and Douglas state even more clearly that,

Kozol also points out that tax-exempt public institutions such as libraries, museums, and universities are more likely to occupy urban than suburban real estate. Even though occupants of nearby suburbs may be equally or more likely to patronize these institutions, they are a drain on the urban tax base.

Following the Rodriguez decision's foreclosure of federal action against educational funding inequality, there was hope that state constitutions might provide a better avenue of appeal. Thirty years later, that approach has unfortunately not yet panned out.

Labels:

Book Review: Savage Inequalities (Part 4)

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

It has been 25 years since Savage Inequalities was first published, and there have been some changes. Schools are still funded primarily by local property taxes, guaranteeing that wealthier school districts will produce better educated children. However, the federal role in education has greatly increased, and funds from Title I and other revenue streams have in some cases ironed out the most glaring disparities. According to a 2002 study by the Government Accounting Office, pupils in Boston, Chicago, and St. Louis now receive more investment than their suburban counterparts.

But I have worked in two of these districts, and I have seen and heard about conditions at some schools that would not be tolerated in Newton or New Trier. Without engaging in an extensive critique of the GAO's numbers, I will say that there are some reasons why they may be misleading. Dropout rates, in part of a product of inferior schools, are much higher in the city. In fact, as Kozol points out, schools often plan for and rely on substantial numbers of students dropping out. Thus, 35 students may be assigned to a classroom with 27 desks on the safe assumption that 8 of those students will not be attending school by the end of the first semester. While per-pupil spending may be high for those students who remain in school, the numbers may not be so rosy when distributed across all of the students that the district ought to be educating.

Moreover, federal education funds are from a free lunch. No Schools Left Behind, the latest incarnation of the Elementary and Secondary Schools Act that authorizes most federal education spending, including Title I, imposes stringent requirements on schools to raise their standardized test scores or lose their money. The result is 'teaching to the test', an education built as much around test-taking skills as around knowledge. Even when asking very progressive, well-meaning administrators for relatively paltry sums of money, I am often asked about how debate affects test scores. Dutiful booster that I am, I'm prepared with an encouraging answer, but sometimes it's hard not to feel like a part of the problem myself.

In the realm of desegregation, there has been no improvement. If anything, segregation has gotten worse than it was when Savage Inequalities was published and is now as bad as it has been since the Brown decision more than 50 years ago. Sadly, the trend seems to be towards ever greater segregation, as courts around the country are scaling back or eliminating busing schemes. The new conservative majority in the Supreme Court ruled during its last term, in a decision in the case of Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, that school districts may not even voluntarily elect to desegregate themselves by making race-based student assignments to public schools. It is cruel and ironic how the 13th amendment, the Brown decision, and even the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, have been co-opted by the conservative agenda in defense of segregation and, by extension, inequality.

Labels: ,

Sunday, January 20, 2008

BDL in the Herald Again!

The Boston Herald ran an article today that was (half) about the Boston Debate League and an event we had yesterday in honor of MLK Day. This time they ran a nice photo of one our debaters; the lack of a picture was one of my disappointments from the last article they did on us. I've included here another picture from the event, this one of me with one of my favorite debaters from the League. He's the only one left from our first season and the only debater we've had who's participated during all four years of his high school career.

A local radio station, WJMN 94.5, is also going to air an interview with a few of our debaters and me between 7 and 8 PM tonight.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Marty Walz on Internet Gambling in MA

Some time ago, I posted a letter that I sent to my elected officials in Massachusetts concerning pending legislation that would simultaneously legalize casino gambling and prohibit internet gambling. I received a response from Governor Patrick, but it was so vacuous that I didn't even bother posting it. It stated only that he appreciated input and would be considering the views of his constiuents as this matter proceeds. He didn't even give his position on the subject.

I did, on the other hand, receive a somewhat more encouraging response from Marty Walz, my state representative. She states that, "I do not have a position on the bill, but I do oppose that section" that prohibits internet gaming. She acknowledges that "the legislature will make substantial changes to the governor's proposal," so this may not be a difficult commitment for her to make, but it was more than the governor did one way or the other.

Labels: ,

Friday, January 11, 2008

Book Review: Savage Inequalities (Part 3)

Part 1

Part 2

One thing I admire about Kozol is that he is much more upfront about his agenda and the sacrifices required than are many other advocates of reform. He admits that, "Attorneys in school-equalization suits have done their best to understate the notion of 'redistribution' of resources. They try instead, whenever possible, to speak in terms that seem to offer something good for everyone involved.... No matter what devices are contrived to bring about equality, it is clear that they require money-transfer, and the largest source of money is the portion of the population that possesses the most money."

This is where the issue gets thorny. Moral outrage is one of Kozol's strongest weapons, and seeing the conditions of the schools he visits, it is hard not to be outraged. The problem is that it is getting harder and harder to find a specific law or institution, let alone specific individuals, to be outraged at.

One of the book's themes, with which I agree, is that disappointingly little has changed since Brown v. Board of Education outlawed legal segregation and indeed since Plessy v. Ferguson allowed segregated facilities provided they were equal. What we have now is a separate and unequal system of education. What has changed is that no one in particular is responsible for this patently unjust system. There is no law that says, "only blacks shall attend DuSable High School," and no Southern governor barring the door of a white school. Instead, there are parents, often liberal parents who in theory favor school desegregation and even affirmative action, trying to do what is best for their own children. And who can blame them for that?

Honestly, I think we have to blame them. Not in an angry or condescending way, necessarily, but as a society we need to ask for more sacrifices from those who have the most. The fifty years since Brown have demonstrated that schools that were actively segregated are not going to desegregate themselves. White families have moved out of cities, gerrymandered school district lines, and even pulled their kids from public school systems altogether rather than see them attend integrated schools.

This is undoubtedly racism, but it isn't, for the most part, the open and virulent racism embodied by groups like the Ku Klux Klan. Many of these families have had no problem inviting upper-middle-class blacks into their classrooms, their neighborhoods, their homes, and their lives. It isn't black people per se that they fear, it is the idea that their children might receive anything less than the best education they could possibly provide for them. There's nothing wrong with caring so much about your kids' education, but there is a problem with providing such opportunities to your own children at the expense of other children. There is a problem with not caring, at least not caring enough to do anything really drastic, that so many other children will attend schools and live in neighborhoods that you have deemed unacceptable for your own progeny.

I am also not speaking here of a small group of especially wealthy or especially inconsiderate people. There were literally hundreds of thousands of white families who fled urban areas and their public education systems in the wake of the Brown decision. In a particularly striking passage, Kozol describes an upscale suburb of New York City called Riverdale, where

"Dozens of college students... went south during the civil rights campaigns to fight for... desegregation.... The parents of these students often made large contributions to support the work of SNCC and CORE. One generation passes, and the cruelties they fought in Mississippi have come north to New York City. Suddenly, no doubt unwittingly, they find themselves opposed to simple things they would have died for 20 years before. Perhaps it isn't fair to say they are 'opposed.' A better word might be 'oblivious.' They do not want poor children to be harmed. They simply want the best for their own children. To the children of the South Bronx, it is all the same."

Labels: ,

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Book Review: Savage Inequalities (Part 2)

The argument can be made, sometimes convincingly, that many forms of inequality in the US result at least in part from poor choices on the part of those who hold the short end of the stick. That argument absolutely disintegrates in the context of education. Not only is it patently unjust in principle to punish or reward children for the actions of their parents (assuming, still, the framework of the 'personal responsibility' crowd), but it is all the moreso in the realm of education, which is a fundamental prerequisite for future responsible decision-making. The result is a rigged game where children are denied the necessary tools for citizenship and employment and then blamed for their failure to find work and obey the law.

I'm no wishy-washy, self-esteem-promoting, "all children are beautiful" hippy. I believe in merit, I believe in special programs for gifted/talented/advanced/whatever-you-want-to-call-them students, and I am perfectly comfortable stating that some people and some kids are smarter, more capable, and all around better and more deserving than others. Higher education is not for everyone, and we need plenty of people to work low-wage, unskilled jobs in our economy. What I am not comfortable with is making those distinctions based on the test scores of a first grader, or even more troubling, based on the color of her skin or the size of her father's salary.

Yet these factors are, implicitly and sometimes even explicitly, the basis on which a great many privileges and opportunities are distributed in America. It is profoundly troubling to me to think of how much innate talent goes unrealized and how much potential is squandered when these children who could have been great scientists, inventors, educators, and leaders instead wind up picking fruit, serving time, or pushing up daisies. As Kozol puts it:

"what is now encompassed by the one word ("school") are two very different kinds of institutions that, in function, finance, and intention, serve entirely different roles. Both are needed for our nation's governance. But children in one set of schools are educated to be governors; children in the other set of schools are trained for being governed....

"Societies cannot be all generals, no soldiers. But, by our schooling patterns, we assure that soldiers' children are more likely to be soldiers and that the offspring of the generals will have at least the option to be generals."

Nor is this a matter of free enterprise under assault from communists clamoring to drag all schools down to the lowest common denominator. On this point, Kozol quotes school reform activist John Coons to the effect that there is "no greater threat to the capitalist system than the present cyclical replacement of the 'fittest' of one generation by their artificially advantaged offspring. Worse, when that advantage is proffered to the children of the successful by the state, we can be sure that free enterprise has sold its birthright." Much like a state-granted monopoly, disparities in education artificially stifle competition and enable less able, less deserving, and less competent people to fill the most powerful and important roles in society.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Book Review: Savage Inequalities (Part 1)

I'm a voracious reader, and it's not my intention to write a review of every book I read. Having just completed Jonathan Kozol's Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools, however, I am moved to record some thoughts here. It turns out I have a lot of thoughts, so I'm going to post this in smaller chunks.

As most of you know, I've done a lot of work, both paid and unpaid, in the Chicago and Boston Public Schools. Racial and economic justice is very important to me, particularly in the context of education. I've rarely encountered anyone who articulated the importance of these issues as well as Kozol, nor anyone who could so deftly expose the most common justifications for the educational disparities that exist in US public education. The book is a lot heavier on outrage and indignation than on solutions, but from what I've seen, that is sadly appropriate. There is much to be outraged about in urban public education, and when it comes to systemic reform, more than 100 years of effort have not yet produced a solution to the dual problems of institutional neglect and racism.

Savage Inequalities weaves history and policy criticism with narratives of the author's visits to urban public schools and conversations with students, teachers and administrators. Despite a century of legal and legislative action, Kozol argues, America maintains a separate and unequal public education system in which poor, largely minority children, arguably those who deserve the most resources, receive an education that is qualitatively different from that of their whiter, wealthier counterparts. These inequalities persist within urban public school systems and between urban and suburban districts, the dividing lines of which were often drawn with explicitly racialized intent.

Kozol's narrative approach is valuable because of how much reality is lost, often deliberately obscured, by the policy debates that surround public education. One common argument that the author addresses repeatedly is the claim that urban students receive an "adequate" education and that more money is not the solution to whatever problems may plague their schools. Leaving aside for a moment the question of what "adequate" really means, Kozol's recounting of bathrooms without stall doors or toilet paper, cafeterias that are routinely closed because of sewage overflow, asphalt playgrounds studded with broken glass, and classrooms without textbooks and in some cases even teachers fly in the face of any definition of the word. It is equally laughable to suggest that money is not a solution to these problems nor that solving these problems would not make education a more positive experience for the children who attend these schools.

This is not to say that more money is a magic-bullet solution to the problems of urban public education or that education is such a solution for larger problems such as poverty and drugs that confront these communities. It is often argued, both by amateurs and by education professionals, that family and cultural problems contribute to an environment where academic skills are not valued or nurtured. Indeed, there is little doubt that children in wealthier school districts would do better in school whether or not that wealth were directly channeled into their schools. Their parents would generally play a larger role in their education and their privilege would afford them more time for study and academic work without the distractions of a rumbling stomach or neighborhood violence.

As Kozol points out, however, "The family... differs from the school in the significant respect that government is not responsible, or at least not directly, for the inequalities of family background. It is responsible for inequalities in public education." It violates any interpretation of justice for a public resource to be provided in greater amounts to those least in need, yet this is exactly how public education functions in the United States.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

2008 Poker New Year's Resolutions

Happy New Year!

Yesterday, I reviewed my 2007 goals and whether I'd achieved them in the last year. Today, I'm going to set some new poker-related goals for 2008. If you're a serious poker player, I think that you ought to do the same.

Last year, I set a monetary goal for myself that I didn't come close to reaching. Mostly, that was because I didn't put in as many hours as I thought I would. But I feel happy with the amount of time that I invested in poker last year, and I don't want to push myself to do more than that this year. Instead, I want to make better use of the time that I do spend by focusing on my most profitable opportunities.

Resolution 1: Focus on Short-Handed NLHE Cash Games

I got my start playing poker tournaments, and I still enjoy them, but the truth is that most aren't worth my time. The stakes in most online tournaments just aren't high enough and my edge isn't as big as it is in cash games. Live tournaments avoid a lot of those problems, but they require a much larger investment of time and money and I can only play table at a time.

Goal 1: Play no more than 400 tournaments in 2008.

Last year, I played 872 poker tournaments, so this will be a big cut-back, but that's exactly what I need.

Goal 2: The average buy-in of the tournaments I play will be at least $500.

Last year, it was $224. I'll be cutting out a lot of the smallest tournaments that I played, though, so I don't think it will be too hard to get this number up. I'm pretty much only going to play "special" tournaments: the weekend majors, the online series like UBOC, FTOPS, and WCOOP, the larger buy-in satellites to live events, and some live tournaments such as the WSOP series.

Goal 3: Play at least 250,000 hands of NLHE cash.

These games are by far my most profitable venture right now. It's nice to play other stuff for fun, as a change of pace, to take advantage of especially profitable opportunities, and to become a more well-rounded player. However, these will almost certainly continue to be my bread and butter. It might sound like a lot, but 250,000 is really a very modest goal for a serious player. I know people who average 50-60K hands or more per month.

Resolution 2: Keep Getting Better at Other Games

I haven't studied it much, but everything I know about the history of poker suggests that no game remains pre-eminent forever. Once upon a time, games like 5 Card Draw, 2-7 NL Single Draw, 5 Card Stud, 7 Card Stud, Razz, and FLHE were all the rage, at least in certain areas. NLHE was actually a dying game before the televising of major tournaments revived it. A good player's edge is just tremendous relative to what it would be in most other games. The fish lose their money too quickly, and the economy peters out.

Television and the internet have changed everything, so maybe the NLHE boom will be different, but I want to be prepared. I've heard some people predict that PLO will be the next big thing, others have said mixed games like HORSE. My money is on PLO, but that's not the point. I've enjoyed the financial freedom that poker has given me to pursue other interests that don't pay the bills, and I don't want to lose that because I fell behind the curve.

Goal 4: Play some WSOP preliminary events in other games (PLHE doesn't count).

I did play a PLHE event last year, but that's really not a terribly different game from NLHE. I could see myself playing Razz, Stud/8, HORSE, PLO, or PLO8 events profitably come June.

Goal 5: Be a winner in 10/20 PLO by the end of the year.

As I said, my own hunch is that if NLHE dies, PLO will be the game to take its place. It's already huge in Europe, it still gives a nice edge to strong players, but it's also attractive to fish because there is a lot of action. I'm very comfortable at 3/6 level right now, not so much because I am good, but because the general poker public is much weaker at PLO than at NLHE. As long as I can keep learning ahead of the curve, I don't anticipate great difficulty in getting to 10/20 by the end of the year.

Goal 6: Be a winner at 30/60 Stud/8 by the end of the year.

Currently, I'm comfortable as high as 10/20. We're only talking about a two level jump here, but because 30/60 is the biggest game that goes regularly, that's where all the best players are. This may not be a realistic goal given that I'll be putting a lot more time into NLHE and PLO than I will be putting into this game.

Resolution 3: Diversify My Income Streams

There are a lot of reasons why relying on poker for the vast majority of my income, no matter how well it's going right now, is not ideal. I want to explore more steady, reliable, and rewarding poker-related opportunities that will also help me build a resume for other fields of work altogether.

Goal 7: Start making money on the blog/website.

This shouldn't be that hard, there are plenty of really inane websites out there that turn a profit. I'm not looking to make a lot of money, mostly I just want to cover my hosting costs and see what's out there. There's some outside chance that this could become very lucrative, and regardless it should help me become better known as a writer and poker player.

Goal 8: Start coaching.

I've got one student right now who is about 2/3 of the way through a 10-hour coaching program that I developed for him. He's growing very quickly as a player and has seen a lot of success since we started working together. I can't take full credit for that, of course, but he attributes much of it to concepts we've worked on. I'm not charging quite as much per hour as I make playing poker, but I enjoy teaching and it's much more rewarding to be working in cooperation with someone than to be constantly competing in the negative-sum, cutthroat world of poker.

I'll have more information about my program out soon, but if you read this and are interested, feel free to contact me now at foucault82(at)yahoo.com.

Goal 9: Affiliate myself with an instructional website.

I'd like to at least do some guest videos for a site like Card Runners, Poker X Factor, or the newly formed Lego Poker or Poker Savvy. I may not have the name recognition of most of the people who currently make videos, but I have a much stronger background in education than almost any pro out there, which I think would be a valuable asset. Obviously I could accomplish this tomorrow if I were willing to do the video for free, so I guess the real goal will be to find a company that's willing to pay me what I consider a fair price.

Goal 10: Get a book deal.

This is by far the most ambitious of my goals, but it would be really sweet. I think it's something I could do well.


I'm very curious to know what kinds of goals others are setting for themselves, so please consider leaving a comment about your own or a link to your own blog where you discuss them. Thanks for reading, and best wishes for a happy new year!

Labels: ,

Monday, December 31, 2007

My Year in Poker

This time last year, I set four major poker goals for myself. It's time now to review and evaluate the year in light of those goals:

Goal 1: Make $X Playing Poker Failed

Sorry, but as usual, I don't want to specify my exact goal or my exact income. I will say, though, that the goal was very ambitious, and I ended up making only a little more than 60% of what I hoped to make. This was largely a matter of not putting in enough hours. My goal assumed both a range of hours I might average playing in a week and a range of what I hoped an hour of playing poker would be worth to me in 2007. I ended up at the low end of my hourly rate, but the real problem was that I was hoping to play 30-40 hours a week and ended up playing a little less than 25. There's a graph of my cumulative profits at the end of this post.

Goal 2: Be a Winner at 10/20 NL Achieved

I was playing 3/6 NL when I played cash towards the end of 2006, but that was also about the time that the UIGEA passed and the games got tougher. I ended up dropping down as low as .5/1 NL and working my way back up. A few months ago, I was not optimistic that I would achieve this, but I have. Although I'm not at the point where I'll just sit down in any 10/20 NL game that's going, with good game selection and over a small sample size, I've been a pretty substantial winner at 10/20 and 10/25 NL. Specifically, I'm at 10.3 BB/100 over 3000 hands. And that actually doesn't count two of my most profitable heads up sessions whose hand histories I failed to grab (stupid UB).

Goal 3: Master Other Forms of Poker Achieved
This one was a little more vague, but I wanted to be good enough to beat some Stud games at some of the higher limits and to be comfortable playing the smaller WSOP events in these games. I didn't end up playing any of these WSOP events, but I think I definitely would have been profitable in the Razz and Stud/8 events, and I did final table major PLO8 and Stud/8 internet tournaments.

I'm at 2.5 BB/100 at 15/30 Razz (though I'm a loser at 20/40 and 30/60- all three over small samples), I'm a big winner at 3/6, 5/10, and 10/20 Stud/8. To my surprise, I ended up having the most success at PLO and PLO8, which were two of my worst games until very recently. Over 7K hands, stakes from 1/2 to 5/10, I'm running at 6 BB/100.

Goal 4: Start a Poker Blog Achieved

I've really enjoyed writing this, and I think it's helped my game tremendously to review and articulate my play every day. I'm especially flattered that I've managed to keep the attention of some non-poker players, such as my father, my friend Mike, and his father, who nevertheless tell me they enjoy keeping up with my exploits. For the sake of 'the outsiders', I should explain the BB/100 notation. BB actually stands for big bet, which is twice the size of the big blind. It's a term that originated in fixed limit poker and doesn't transfer well to NL and PL games.

So when I say I'm running at 2.5 BB/100 at 15/30 Razz, that means that I've made 2.5 * $30 = $75 for every 100 hands I've played of Razz at those stakes. But 10 BB/100 at 10/20 NLHE means I've made 10*$20*2 = $400 for every 100 hands I play of NLHE at those stakes. These large numbers are owing to a small sample size over which I've enjoyed some above average luck and also some extreme selectiveness about which games I'll play. In other words, I make this much because I only play this high when the games are particularly good. I can't just sit down and make that kind of money whenever I want.

Other Accomplishments and Disappointments

1. Cashing for a second time in the main event of the World Series of Poker was of course a huge thrill. If you haven't already, you should check out the trip report. I think it's some of the best writing I've done.

2. Although I spent an entire day at the ESPN feature table during the 2006 World Series of Poker, I actually saw more air time this year when I eliminated well-known professional Barry Greenstein. The autographed copy of his book that he gave me is a treasured souvenir from the experience.

3. Every Sunday, the major internet poker sites all offer their largest tournaments of the weak with buyins ranging from $100-$1000 and some drawing thousands of entrants. I spend most of my Sundays grinding my way through for five or ten of these and end most of my Sundays with suicidal ideations. That's how frustrating it is trying to navigate these huge fields. But I did finally win one of them last month, the $200K Guarantee on Ultimate Bet.

4. In March, the editor of 2+2 Internet Magazine invited me to start contributing to the monthly publication. I've published an article in every issue since, and my 11th should be published tomorrow. Even though it's just an internet magazine, the pay is decent, and it's very flattering to be affiliated with the publishers of what are, in my opinion, the highest quality poker books on the market.

5. My biggest disappointment of the year was not winning satellites to any international tournaments. I had a great time last year at EPT Barcelona, and while I didn't play a ton of satellites, I played enough that even as a break-even player it was more likely than not that I would have won something. The closest I came was finishing fourth in a tournament where the top two were going to get seats. I lost a coin flip to a guy who made what I consider a pretty bad call with AK.

6. Despite a few big wins, my Return on Investment in tournaments this year was a fairly lackluster 23%. It's pretty much impossible ever to play enough tournaments to get a meaningful sample size, but I think my true ROI is probably around 50%, meaning that I experienced considerably below average luck in the 872 tournaments I played this year.

Year-Long Graph

This pretty well reflects the mix of tournaments and cash games that I play. I win pretty consistently at cash games, slowly growing my bankroll and offsetting frequent, small tournament losses. Then occasionally I make a big score in a tournament- you can see clearly where the WSOP and the UB 200K occurred.

Tomorrow, I'll have another post about my poker goals and resolutions for the New Year.

Labels: ,

Saturday, November 24, 2007

The Narrows

On Friday morning, we got the chance to explore the region of Zion called The Narrows that we had to pass on Sunday. As the name suggests, it's a particularly narrow portion of the canyon that is both one of the most scenic and one of the most difficult to traverse. In many places, the canyon floor is completely immersed by the Virgin River. During summer months, the water is warm enough for even amateur hikers to wade through The Narrows and appreciate its stunning, other-worldly assets.

November, however, is a different story. The water temperature hovers not far above freezing, cold enough to numb unprotected limbs in a matter of minutes. Undeterred, intrepid explorers such as ourselves rent waterproof pants and shoes and Neoprene socks to protect against the frigid water. Armed with sturdy walking sticks to help us keep our footing despite slick rocks and swift currents, we plunged into the heart of Zion.

This was our first river hike, and it's a fun but tricky skill to acquire. It takes some trust to splash fully clothed into the knee-deep, icy cold river. The water rushes into your socks and momentarily chills your toes, but this is normal. Soon, your body heat warms that water and keeps your feet even more comfortable than if they were dry. Meanwhile, a rubber gasket around your ankle prevents any water from rushing up your pants legs and freezing the rest of your body. Instead, you feel a strange sucking sensation on your legs as the Gore-Tex material forms a water-tight seal against your skin.

Using your thick, shoulder-height pole for balance, you can walk relatively comfortably even through the more shallow rapids. The trick is to realize that you have three points of contact with the riverbed: two feet and the tip of your walking stick. As long as two of these are secured at any given time, the going won't be too difficult.
If you can see the bottom of the river, then stepping there is safe. Beyond that, your stick is also useful for probing the depths of the murky, dark green sections where you can't see the bottom. We were wearing only waterproof pants, so water that came up over our waists would be a disaster. Fortunately, the low water level meant that we could traverse the entire 16-mile length of The Narrows, if we wanted, without ever wading deeper than our thights. If we could remain on our feet, that is.
Generally, the river was shallower near either wall of the canyon, but when it did start to get deep on the side where you'd been walking, the only option was to cut horizontally across the deepest water and strongest current at the center of the river in order to reach the opposite shallows. Sometimes, particularly because of the low water level, we were able to walk across dry ground or very shallow sandbars.
Even during the hottest part of the afternoon, the bottom of The Narrows receives very little direct sunlight. The light does reflect magnificently off of the amber walls that tower overhead, however, making for some brilliant colors and an awe-inspiring atmosphere. You quickly become accustomed to the cliffs that soar hundreds of feet directly above you, because at a sharp angle you can't really appreciate their scale anyway, but sometimes you see another hiker in the distance and realize just how tiny he, and therefore you, are in relation to the massive canyon walls.

Just as in the rest of the canyon, there are occasional crags, waterfalls, caves, and even side canyons hidden along the way. It's a real challenge to pay attention to your footing with so much fascinating scenery constantly seducing your gaze.
The best place to pause and take it all in is on one of the larger 'islands' where heaps of sand and stone rise well above water level. The highest of these sustain shrubs, grasses, and sometimes even deciduous trees. In November, the leaves of these trees have all turned yellow, orange, and pink, falling from their branches and blanketing the land around them in a pastel carpet. When illuminated by the soft light filtering in from the crack of sky far above, these islands adopt a heavenly glow, and I feel like Odysseus venturing into the Elysian fields (look it up, cretin).
November is generally a dead month in Zion, but Thanksgiving weekend is a tremendous exception. We waited in a line of cars 100-deep to get into the park and had to improvise a parking spot in the overcrowded lot near a rock formation called the Temple of Sinawava.

It's a different story in The Narrows, however, and we encounter only about twenty other hikers during our four hour tour. These range from grizzled veterans carrying packs large enough for multi-day hikes and ropes for thorough exploration of side canyons to other novices like ourselves wielding red-tassled walking sticks that mark them as renters from the same company that outfitted Emily and me.

We even encounter one particularly fool-hardy couple carrying no walking stick and wearing only sandles with jeens rolled up to their knees. "Can you still feel your toes?" Emily asks them.

"Barely," replies the woman, who seems much less excited about this trek than her partner. When they are out of earshot, we joke about how we will manage to carry their hypothermic bodies out of the canyon.

Unfortunately, we got kind of a late start on the day and have to turn back well before we would have preferred to avoid being caught in The Narrows after sunset, when the temperature plummets and the canyon is pitch black. Still, it was a great hike, one of the most interesting and beautiful we've done and also unique in its challenges.

The only bad news is that we forgot the replacement battery for Emily's camera and were left with only a cheap disposable that was no match for the majestic canyon. Those also haven't been developed yet, so unlike the pictures from my previous posts, the ones on here all come courtesy of PDPhoto.

Labels: , , ,

Thanksgiving in Utah

The plan for Thursday was to rise early, rent appropriate gear, and hike/wade Zion's most famous region, The Narrows. Emily woke up not feeling particularly well, however, and so we nixed that and I got breakfast alone while she slept.

It was a crisp, quiet morning, and I enjoyed the solitary walk from our motel to a nearby restaurant called The Pioneer, the only place in town open for breakfast Thanksgiving morning. The dim orange walls of Zion hovered quietly nearby, so large, still, and beautiful that they seemed almost surreal.

My walk took me past an elk farm where I was fortunate enough to catch two males in combat, antlers locked together and powerful shoulder muscles twisting in opposition to one another. From time to time, the larger of the two would gain the upper hand and twist the neck of his opponent until the beast whimpered in submission. Then he would release the loser and eye him warily. This proved wise, as the smaller male came back three or four times to test his luck before finally giving up. This was already more excitement than I usually see in a day, and I hadn't even had my coffee yet!
After breakfast and some coaxing, Emily finally felt up to a short hike. We headed for the Emerald Pools, a "must see" destination in Zion, and had ourselves a nice hike. We were looking for something very basic, and though this path turned out to be a bit longer and more strenuous than we anticipated, Emily was recovering quickly and ultimately it was a pretty good fit for us.

The path itself followed the banks of the Virgin for a ways through a lightly forested region to the Lower Pools, which was the bottom of three pools formed by water that seemed to cascade out of the rocks themselves. In actuality, this was rainwater that had seeped into the porous sandstone and came to the surface only when it encountered a layer of shale that it could not pass, so in a way, it really was coming out of the rocks. Unfortunately, it hadn't rained in a while, so the cascades were little more than trickles.

The pools themselves, however, were still pretty neat. The slow but steady flow of water had carved an impressive cave into the canyon wall, and the algae in the pools gave them the green color for which they were named. From the right angle, it also lent them a mirrored surface that reflected back the majesty of the nearby cliffs.

After ascending to the highest of the three pools, we made our way back down to the main trail and followed a two-mile loop back to the parking lot. This trek took us along the rim of one of the lower canyon walls and provided some spectacular views of the valley and river below:


By the time we got back to the car, we were quite hungry and looking forward to a big Thanksgiving dinner. The only problem was that we didn't have a reservation anywhere, and only a few of nearby Springdale's restaurants were open to accomodate the swarm of tourists who descended on Zion for a long weekend. Thankfully, a willingness to sit at the bar meant that we were able to get seats right away at The Switchback, where we'd had a delicious meal our first night in the area. They offered a great buffet with a wide variety of entrees, sides, and desserts for something like $30/person. A similar holiday mean in Boston would have been more than twice as much, I'm sure.
The only drawback was that the buffet was poorly laid out and we had to wait in a fairly long line with a bunch of families that, it being Utah, were either Mormon or at least weird. There were a lot of women in plain dresses and unfashionably long hair, well-dressed and well-behaved children, and tall, quiet man with greying, carefully parted hair.
One of these gentlemen was just ahead of me in the line, and for ten minutes or so I had nothing better to do than contemplate what a creepy looking guy he was. He was a slender man and carried himself with an awkwardly stiff posture, wore neatly pressed black slacks with a zip-up red turtleneck thing, and sported one of those conservative haircuts. The creepiest thing by far, however, were his grey eyes that stared straight ahead as though he could see his personal salvation just ahead of him.
When we finally got to the first station, the salad bar, he methodically scooped several tongfuls of lettuce into his bowl, occasionally glancing up at me but saying nothing. He was very insistent on getting a description of each of the eight salad dressings available. When the server finished her litany, the man looked at me as though he and I alone shared in the secret that Our Lord And Savior would not approve of these options, and in fact he walked off without any dressing at all.
I thought nothing further of it until we met again at the bread station. His cold dead eyes locked with mine, and he asked, with no hint of mirth in his voice, "Are you following me?"
After several full-body shivers, I responded, "You must have good taste," but he just turned and walked away without another word.
The line died down after that, so subsequent trips didn't take nearly so long, and all in all it was an enjoyable meal and a great Thanksgiving.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Angel's Landing

I'm currently on vacation, spending Thanksgiving with my girlfriend in Utah's Zion Canyon. Yesterday, we hiked a beautiful trail called Angel's Landing. Though most of it was paved, it was still strenuous at times, as were ascending over 1000 feet in about two miles of horizontal distance.

We departed from a parking lot and picnic area called The Grotto. In the shadow of towering peaks, dotted with bright yellow trees, and adjoined by a wide but shallow river, our jumping off point already had an exciting feel about it. Other hikers unloaded gear from their cars and snapped photographs of the prismatic canyon walls as small children played in the fallen leaves that carpeted the lawn. You'd never believe that driving just a few dozen miles in any direction would plunge you into the midst of a vast, dry, brown and featureless desert, in no small part because it was quite chilly in the shade and the morning wind. I donned a fleece, wind shell, hat, and gloves before leaving the car.

Our trail crossed the river via a sturdy bridge and began its ascent up a sloping rock pile that formed the base of a sheer-faced peak. The terrain here was scrubby and green, with few leafy trees to shield us from the desert sun that beat down on the exposed mountainside. Within minutes, my hat and gloves were in my pockets and my jacket was unzipped. A few minutes after that, I was carrying the jacket and regretting having brought it at all.

When we summited the rock pile and reached the canyon wall proper, the nature of the trail changed dramatically from a gentle, diagonal slice across the debris to a sharp series of switchbacks up and around the cliff face. After a few of these demanding circuits, the path opened onto a bridge across a dry ravine and over to the side of an adjacent peak. This once again put us on flat terrain that followed a riverbed for a while. Judging from the lush plant life, this wasn't ordinarily a dry riverbed, just one that hadn't seen rain for a month or so. That was a shame, because flowing water surely would have made for an even more picturesque hike.

Eventually, we left the river's edge and began ascending again, now flanked by the wind-shaped walls of Zion Canyon. From up close, you can see a remarkable amount of texture and sometimes even find tiny caves large enough to hold a person.

Towards the end of the trail, it gave way to a series of extremely steep and tightly wrapped switchbacks with no purpose other than to rush us as quickly as possible up the last hundred feet or so to the summit.


As it turned out, however, this brought us only to Scout's Landing, still an impressive vista but not the endpoint of the trail. To reach Angel's Landing, we'd need to undertake a perilous climb across about 500 feet of sheer cliff face. Chains embedded in the rock to aid climbers would be the only thing standing between us and a plunge of more than 1000 feet to the canyon floor.

Multiple signs cautioned against horseplay and warned that slips on the path to Angel's Landing had resulted in death. Near where we stopped to snack at Scout's Landing, several other hikers were discussing the recent sentencing of a man who allegedly pushed his wife off of this very cliff.

It occurred to me that if Emily were to slip, I might find myself falsely accused of murder. Besides, I'm not much for heights, and there were other sights to see, so we elected not to undertake the last 500 feet of the climb to Angel's Landing. We still had a quite nice view from where we were:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Labels:

Saturday, November 17, 2007

My Cousin

There are a lot of things I like about living in Boston that I didn't like about the area where I grew up in Maryland. But I do miss my family, which particularly on my father's side is very close, and nothing kills me like my 10-year old cousin Hannah, whose birthday is today.

She's far from my closest relative, but whenever I see her (which is not very often), I get the biggest guilt trip you could imagine. She and her mother drove down from Pennsylvania for my birthday (I was in Maryland at the time), and when she walked into the restaurant where we were meeting for dinner, she dashed across the room screaming, "Andrew! It's been so long!"

What 10-year old talks like that?

And when I left, she literally put one hands on her hip, wagged her finger at me, and said quite sternly, "Don't make it so long next time!"

If I saw the scene in a movie, I would think it was cliched, shameless heartstring-tugging. Just imagine this adorable little girl, tall with shiny red hair down to her waist and a bit of a lisp, singing to me, "I'll see you at Cwissmass." Kills me.

Labels:

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Musil Quotes

I'm currently reading Robert Musil's "The Man Without Qualities," a gift from a friend of mine who is a student of German literature. It's a very insightful and well-written book with a lot of humorous passages, though it's a bit long-winded at times. Anyway, I recently came across a few quotes that struck me as at least kind of relevant to my current relationship with the game/profession of poker:

"...high-mindedness is the mark of every professional ideology. Hunters, for instance, would never dream of calling themselves the butchers of wild game; they prefer to call themselves the duly licensed friends of nature and animals; just as businessmen uphold the principle of an honorable profit, while the businessman's god, Mercury, that distinguished promoter of international relations, is also the god of thieves. So the image of a profession in the minds of its practitioners is not too reliable."

Upon reading this, I thought immediately of the professional players who claim they are providing entertainment in exchange for the money of the losing players. This is really just one example of the many excuses and justifications our community makes for the game. I find some of them more credible than others, but I do often have the nagging feeling that I am a little too eager to find some argument or another that can validate poker as a genuinely ethical pursuit.

"...the day when one must begin to live out one's final will, before leaving the rest behind, lies far ahead and cannot be postpone. This had become menacingly clear to him now that almost xis months had gone by and nothing had changed. He was waiting: all the time, he was letting himself be pushed this way and that is the insignificant and silly activity he had taken on, talking, gladly talking too much, living with the desperate tenacity of a fisherman casting his nets into an empty river, while he was doing nothing that had anything to do with the person he after all signified; deliberately doing nothing; he was waiting."

I can't help but feel this way sometimes, that all of the time I spend playing and thinking about poker really has very little to do with the kind of person I think of myself as or want to be. I started playing as a short-term means of paying the rent, and as the money got better and better, I became less and less inclined to pursue a real job or career. I always felt that I would do these things, but later, after saving up some money and such. But recently, I've been feeling more and more as though I have no criteria for what will be 'enough' or when it will be 'later' and time to start pursuing something else.

Both of these subjects have been on my mind lately, and I think Musil, writing about a different era (early twentieth century Vienna), nevertheless speaks somewhat eloquently to my current condition at times.

Labels: ,

Monday, November 5, 2007

Boston Globe Article

Today's Boston Globe ran an article about the Harvard Law School seminar that I attended recently. I remembered meeting this reporter but thought she was from Harvard's paper, the Crimson. I probably would have put more thought into how I portrayed myself, but I think I come off pretty well and not like a degenerate:

"The message resonated with some of the dozens of students and poker players who came to hear Addington speak. Andrew Brokos, 25, who makes money playing poker online 25 to 30 hours each week and teaches debate to Boston public school students, said that while he never hands out cards and chips to his students, the skills he teaches are similar to "no limit hold 'em."

Debaters must watch their opponents closely, play each argument strategically, and use "crystallized aggression" to win a debate - the same way they would try to win a high-stakes hand, he said."

Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Boston Debate League Tournament One

The first round of the first tournament of the Boston Debate League’s fourth season has just gotten underway. With about forty students competing, it is one of our largest events ever. Unfortunately, 90% of the debaters are from 50% of the schools in the League. While these schools are doing very well, the other half of the League has not gotten off to such a good start. It’s something we’ll need to work on during the year, but seeing the enthusiasm, and the nervousness, of all the students here makes it seem like a much more manageable problem than it did earlier this week.

There is such a hectic energy that surrounds these events, particularly the first one of the year, when there are so many kids who are trying debate out for the first time. Some are driven by their fear to arrive early and pace nervously outside of the school until I arrive to let them in. Others panic and can only be coaxed into coming by coaches and teammates who spend the arrival/breakfast hour furiously calling and texting their no-shows.

These coaches, veteran and novice alike, scramble to marshal their squads for the season opener. They have registered their students with me several days ago in teams of two, but I’ve learned to prepare for a barrage of 11th hour changes:

“Shanice isn’t coming, drop her and pair Marcus with Beni. Tarell can debate alone.”

“Chanelle and Kiki are having a spate; we need to split them up. Pair Chanelle with Dan and Kiki with Jemal.”

“I have a student who’s never been to a practice, but he’s here now and wants to debate. He’s not registered. Is that OK? Can we find him a partner from a different school?”

“Shanice is here, let’s put her back with Marcus, then Beni and Tarell will debate together after all.”

It takes me three drafts of the schedule for Round 1 to get everything straight. Almost half the teams in the Novice division are from the same school, meaning that they can not debate against each other, and my computer program has difficulty generating a schedule that meets this constraint. Meanwhile, there are only four teams in the Varsity division, and although two of them are from the same school, there is no way around pairing them against each other for one of the three rounds. But computers are not given to such compromises, and ultimately it becomes easier to print the closest approximation that the program can give me and then correct it by hand.

All of this logistical work occurs amidst a blur of commotion: stomping feet, pounding music, beeping timers, and the din of young voices echoing through the vast hallways of this big brick schoolhouse. I puzzle over the constantly shifting matrix of school names and student initials, all the while incorporating last minute changes, pointing late arrivals vaguely in the direction of the auditorium, where donuts and coffee await them, and fending off unimportant inquiries and requests to “hurry, the students are getting restless.” It is as demanding as playing eight tables of poker at once, and I love every second of it.

Finally, I’m ready to photocopy and distribute the pairings just ten minutes behind schedule. Only a few people notice that I’ve entered the auditorium and ascended the wooden stairs to the podium at center stage, but they quickly start a chorus of shushing the spreads quickly across the disparate huddles of well-dressed teenagers.

“Good morning, everyone. Thanks for your patience. The veterans among you know that it wouldn’t be a BDL tournament without some hectic activity in the morning. But you also know that we usually make up that time over the course of the day and finish ahead of schedule, because I’m just that good.” Usually my faux arrogance is a good for laughs or even a few cheers, but this crowd is anxious to get started. I skip my introductions and get right to business, making a few announcements and then handing out the pairings and the judge’s ballots.

A mob of people, coaches and students alike, converge on the pile of paper at the front of the auditorium. Papers are shuffled, sheets passed back and forth between friends and strangers alike, and everyone is scrambling to gather her things and get to her assigned room. It is now 9:45, and I have told them to start their debates at 9:30.

By 9:50, the auditorium is empty, save for a few coats, backpacks, and crumpled Dunkin’ Donuts boxes. Season Four is officially underway.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, October 8, 2007

I'm back

Sorry for the long silence, I was out of town for a wedding and didn't have much time to update. Quick funny story from the wedding: I caught the garter when the groom threw it, which apparently meant I had to put it onto the leg of the woman who caught the bouquet that the bride threw. Every inch above her knee was supposed to mean 5 years of good luck for the married couple or something like that.

So the bride had 13 bridesmaids who were practically the only single women at the wedding, and 12 of them were pretty good looking. The last one was somewhat trollish, though, and even though the wedding was on a Friday, fortune frowned on me as though it were a Sunday, meaning that I had to feel up the leg of lucky number 13.

I could barely get the garter past her knee at all, and I tried to quit there, but the bride glowered at me for cursing her wedding, so I gave it another go and managed to force the thing another inch up this bitch's fat thigh. Meanwhile she was making at harder by squirming and giggling at what was probably the first guy to go crawling underneath her skirt in some time.

Finally the elastic band of the garter made clear to me that it would stretch no further, and I withdrew my hand. But apparently it was my job to take the thing off, too, so I had to reach back up her skirt for a third time to retrieve it. Goddammit why couldn't one of the leggy blonds have shown a little hustle?!?!

Labels:

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

October: So Far, So Good

Two days in, and I've recovered about 1/3 of what was lost in September. I have a bunch of stuff on a list to post, but I got wrapped up in a really good heads up match that kept me up later than I planned, so I don't have time to do that now. And I'm going to be out of town the next few days, so it may be a bit before I post more poker stuff. But I posted a ton yesterday, so get over it!

Labels: ,

Monday, October 1, 2007

Worst Week Ever, Worst Month Ever



Yesterday concluded both the worst week and the worst month of my poker career. I'm not going to post dollar figures, but I lost about 15% of my bankroll and slashed my hourly rate for the year by nearly 1/3.

I initially put this graph together to garner pity, but I actually found it reassuring. The last month really does look like a substantial but not heart-breaking dip in what has otherwise been a pretty satisfying trend. The best news is that this graph only displays my online winnings, so that big spike that occurs in July doesn't even include the money I won in Vegas.

My profits so far this year haven't been anywhere near where I think they should be, let alone where I hoped they would be. When I think about it objectively, though, I have still made more money than any person should be able to make clicking buttons on the internet.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Summer Institute Pictures

I've finally got some pictures from the BDL Summer Institute last month up on the BDL website. Click here to see them.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

August

...was my third losing month of 2007. I was only out about $1500, and I made almost $1000 in rakeback, so it was really more of a breakeven month than a losing month. Still, there was a negative sign in front of the total on my spreadsheet, and that makes me said.

Really, though, I just haven't had a lot of time to play. Between running the Boston Debate League summer institute, traveling to Chicago to hang out with Dave and work at the Chicago Debate League summer institute, then hosting my girlfriend and a friend from high school over the last 10 days, I just didn't end up putting in very many hours at the table. It was nice to spend so much time being social, because now that Emily is living in Las Vegas I can easily go a few days without speaking to anyone I know.

It was good to see each of them for different reasons: Dave I see only once or twice a year; Mike was my best friend in high school but we haven't spent much time together since we both graduated 7 years ago; and this was the first time I'd seen Emily since I left Las Vegas over a month ago. In college, it was normal for us to go weeks without seeing each other, since she lived in Boston and I in Chicago, but since we moved in together three years ago this was the longest we'd been apart. We speak on the phone most nights, but I don't really like talking on the phone no matter who's on the other end, so that accomplishes only so much.

But now August is over, and I have a few obligations in September, but mostly I am looking to finish up my summer work, get the BDL off the ground, make another brief trip to Chicago, and play the World Championship of Online Poker upon my return. Wish me luck!

Labels: ,