<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Against Pot Control	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 16:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-57505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/?page_id=1763#comment-57505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-57496&quot;&gt;H.S. Theodore&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not usually going to be possible to cause opponents to fold such strong draws, nor should that be your primary objective. Instead, you should focus on the hands against which you are a big favorite (top pair with a worse kicker in particular) and think about how to win the most from them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-57496">H.S. Theodore</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not usually going to be possible to cause opponents to fold such strong draws, nor should that be your primary objective. Instead, you should focus on the hands against which you are a big favorite (top pair with a worse kicker in particular) and think about how to win the most from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: H.S. Theodore		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-57496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H.S. Theodore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 11:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/?page_id=1763#comment-57496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing still confuses me: if I have top pair/strong kicker after the flop, but there&#039;s 2 cards of the same suit (that I don&#039;t have), I tend to try to take the lead with a strong bet in order to make it too expensive for my opponent to chase the flush. Sadly, low stakes players don&#039;t even know what pot odds are,  so they chase the flush anyway. Is this sensible, or have I missed the mark entirely? Please advise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing still confuses me: if I have top pair/strong kicker after the flop, but there&#8217;s 2 cards of the same suit (that I don&#8217;t have), I tend to try to take the lead with a strong bet in order to make it too expensive for my opponent to chase the flush. Sadly, low stakes players don&#8217;t even know what pot odds are,  so they chase the flush anyway. Is this sensible, or have I missed the mark entirely? Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: H.S. Theodore		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-57495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H.S. Theodore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 11:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/?page_id=1763#comment-57495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent. Good comprehensive review of both sides of the aisle. I play a lot of 6-max sit-n-goes, so I often don&#039;t have sufficient time and data to label my opponent, ie, LAG, TAG, tight-passive, big bluffer, etc. Thus, the guidelines presented here give me an excellent game plan!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. Good comprehensive review of both sides of the aisle. I play a lot of 6-max sit-n-goes, so I often don&#8217;t have sufficient time and data to label my opponent, ie, LAG, TAG, tight-passive, big bluffer, etc. Thus, the guidelines presented here give me an excellent game plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JJ OOP, 4 Way - Page 6		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/articles/against-pot-control/#comment-24636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ OOP, 4 Way - Page 6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wordpress/?page_id=1763#comment-24636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] reading Thinking Poker: Against Pot Control  Tbh though, this isn&#039;t even really considered pot control, since you were not closing the action.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reading Thinking Poker: Against Pot Control  Tbh though, this isn&#039;t even really considered pot control, since you were not closing the action.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
