<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thinking Poker &#187; loose aggressive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/tag/loose-aggressive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net</link>
	<description>Poker strategy blog, poker book reviews, trip reports and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Easy Game by Andrew Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4-bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5-bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6-max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew seidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balugawhale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet sizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuation bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-limit hold 'em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarized range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-handed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin value bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple barrel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just published a review of one of the best and most advanced poker books I&#8217;ve encountered, the 3rd Edition of Andrew &#8220;BalugaWhale&#8221; Seidman&#8217;s Easy Game. It&#8217;s probably too advanced for your average recreational player, but if you want to be a serious competitor at no-limit hold &#8216;em it&#8217;s a marvelous read. Here&#8217;s a bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/poker-book-reviews/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/easy-game-460/" rel="attachment wp-att-8318"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8318" title="easy-game-460" src="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/images//easy-game-460-199x300.png" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>I just published a<a href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/poker-book-reviews/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/"> review</a> of one of the best and most advanced poker books I&#8217;ve encountered, the 3rd Edition of <a href="http://www.balugawhale.com/">Andrew &#8220;BalugaWhale&#8221; Seidman&#8217;s <em>Easy Game</em></a>. It&#8217;s probably too advanced for your average recreational player, but if you want to be a serious competitor at no-limit hold &#8216;em it&#8217;s a marvelous read. Here&#8217;s a bit of what I had to say about it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Seidman not only updates his advice for contemporary game conditions but also corrects a few of his own earlier mistakes and re-explains some material in light of his current thinking about the game. The result is substantial value added to what was already an exceptionally good no-limit hold &#8216;em cash game book, one of the few offering really high-level insights to experienced players.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read the full review at <a href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/poker-book-reviews/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/poker-book-reviews/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/book-review-easy-game-by-andrew-seidman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PCA Trip Report, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/pca-trip-report-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/pca-trip-report-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trip Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet sizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bjoern schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuation bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-limit hold 'em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pokerstars caribbean adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarized range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin value bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wait is over! I&#8217;m flattered by everyone who&#8217;s been asking about this. Part 1 of my PCA Trip Report is now appearing in 2+2 Magazine. Part 2 will be in next month&#8217;s magazine. Here&#8217;s a snippet from one of the more interesting hands I played: Saskatchewan limped UTG again, Belgium limped behind, and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wait is over! I&#8217;m flattered by everyone who&#8217;s been asking about this. <a href="http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/issue86/andrew-brokos-pca-trip-report-part1.php">Part 1 of my PCA Trip Report</a> is now appearing in 2+2 Magazine. Part 2 will be in next month&#8217;s magazine. Here&#8217;s a snippet from one of the more interesting hands I played:</p>
<blockquote><p>Saskatchewan limped UTG again, Belgium limped behind, and I raised to 1,000 with A4o in the CO. This raise really blurs the line between “value” and “making a move”, since I do expect to win often with a continuation bet but I also think A4 is ahead of both of their ranges. Essentially I&#8217;ve got position and the best hand, so even though it might be tricky to play post-flop, I don&#8217;t see how raising can be bad. Saskatchewan joked about how “you internet guys don&#8217;t allow limping” and called, and Belgium called as well. They both checked a K83 rainbow, I bet 1,600, Saskatchewan folded, and Belgium quickly raised to 5,100. I was sure he was making a move, so I considered my options.</p></blockquote>
<p>This trip report focuses almost exclusively on the poker. If you want to read about the rest of the trip, check out <a href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/hello-goodbye-team-online/">Hello, Goodbye, Team Online</a>.</p>
<p>As always, please let me know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/02/pca-trip-report-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick PCA Day 1 Update</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/quick-pca-day-1-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/quick-pca-day-1-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Poker News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bjorn schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuation bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jorge limon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-limit hold 'em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pokerstars caribbean adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarized range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Session Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin value bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took plenty of notes for a full write-up, but for now I&#8217;ll just say that we started with 30K and I finished with 38.5K. I think the average is between 50 and 60, and blinds will be 500/1000/100 on Monday, so I&#8217;m in OK shape. I had two other PokerStars Team Online members at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took plenty of notes for a full write-up, but for now I&#8217;ll just say that we started with 30K and I finished with 38.5K. I think the average is between 50 and 60, and blinds will be 500/1000/100 on Monday, so I&#8217;m in OK shape. I had two other PokerStars Team Online members at my table, first Bjorn Schneider on my left than Jorge Limon on my right. Other than Bjorn and a pretty good Dutch player my starting table was probably softer than average. By the end of the day we had Jorge and two other good high-stakes cash players, so it was pretty tough then.</p>
<p>I played a funny hand against one of them. Blinds were 400/800/100, and I opened to 2000 with K9s in the HJ. He called in the BB and check-called 2400 on a T55r flop. We both checked an 8 turn, then he bet 5600 on a T river. I wasn&#8217;t 100% sure he wouldn&#8217;t value bet an A, but I doubted it. I did think he was capable of floating out of position, and this was an ideal spot for it. So I called, and he showed A3 and seemed surprised to win the pot. &#8220;I was trying to bluff you off a chop&#8221; he told me. Lovely.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got tomorrow off and am looking forward to finally getting outside after spending my first two days here indoors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2012/01/quick-pca-day-1-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coaching Brag</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/coaching-brag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/coaching-brag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker Coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6-max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet sizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuation bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTT coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-limit hold 'em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarized range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Session Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-handed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple barrel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my primary goals when coaching poker is to help my students think more creatively and situationally, to consider all of their options rather than just doing what they think is &#8220;standard&#8221;. They learn to find value in places they hadn&#8217;t thought to look for it by thinking through all aspects of a situation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my primary goals when <a href="http://www.thinkingpoker.net/coaching/">coaching poker</a> is to help my students think more creatively and situationally, to consider all of their options rather than just doing what they think is &#8220;standard&#8221;. They learn to find value in places they hadn&#8217;t thought to look for it by thinking through all aspects of a situation rather than focusing narrowly on their own holding. One common example of this is learning when and how to play unpaired hands for showdown value, usually but not always as bluff-catchers. Initially, many people are very uncomfortable calling with a hand like Ace-high. They might consider bluffing with it, but they usually have trouble recognizing opportunities to show it down as the best hand in all but the smallest pots.</p>
<p>I got an IM yesterday from a student who&#8217;s worked with me for a few months. He is originally from Paris, and though he now lives in Manhattan, he played this hand at a French casino while visiting his mother for the holidays. It couldn&#8217;t be a better example of what I&#8217;m trying to help my students achieve, and I am really proud both of this student and of the progress he has made:</p>
<p>[12/22/2011 8:38:16 PM] Student: dedicated a call to you tonight! <img src='http://www.thinkingpoker.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
[12/22/2011 8:38:44 PM] Foucault: i&#8217;m intrigued<br />
[12/22/2011 8:39:02 PM] Student: haha, ok, 6max french tournament.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:39:24 PM] Student: 400/800/75<br />
[12/22/2011 8:39:29 PM] Student: i have 36k<br />
[12/22/2011 8:39:40 PM] Student: huge stack to my right has around 70k<br />
[12/22/2011 8:40:22 PM] Student: the previous hand was me and him BvB and I shoved on his cbet with an open ender. he folded very frustrated saying &#8220;next time you&#8217;re getting called.&#8221;<br />
[12/22/2011 8:40:32 PM] Student: type of guy who if things don&#8217;t go his way, you&#8217;re a bad player.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:40:49 PM] Student: so the following hand he opens to 2400 in the CO and I have A8ss in the btn.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:41:08 PM] Student: pretty sure that a 3bet would get be very little respect and woudl lack fold euiqty, i decided to flat.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:41:15 PM] Student: flop comes K5K<br />
[12/22/2011 8:41:27 PM] Student: and he bets 1400 into 6000<br />
[12/22/2011 8:42:14 PM] Student: his range in the co is too wide to put him on a K right away but I don&#8217;t think raising him here is going to achieve much.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:42:30 PM] Student: and i&#8217;m getting obv getting a good price so I peel one.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:42:39 PM] Student: turn a 7d<br />
[12/22/2011 8:43:09 PM] Student: he now bets around 8500 into 9k.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:43:44 PM] Student: i have 30k behind roughly and start to think about his line and how it doesn&#8217;t make sense for him to do this with a K.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:44:23 PM] Student: the small bet on flop and huge bet on turn seems fishy so I decide to call assuming i&#8217;m good and ready to call or check back a lot of rivers.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:44:52 PM] Student: river 10h and he shoves.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:45:15 PM] Student: i tanked for about 5 mins. eventually deciding that he either had a full house/AK or air.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:45:57 PM] Student: I think he checks all his PP, all his 10 (J10, Q10..etc&#8230;)<br />
[12/22/2011 8:46:10 PM] Student: obviously values his K10 but i don&#8217;t think that big.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:46:28 PM] Student: and certainly doesn&#8217;t value a pair of 7&#8242;s or 5&#8242;s. not good enough.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:46:53 PM] Student: So I call and he inta mucks.<br />
[12/22/2011 8:47:04 PM] Foucault: did you show?<br />
[12/22/2011 8:47:11 PM] Student: i did<br />
[12/22/2011 8:47:13 PM] Foucault: you have to<br />
[12/22/2011 8:47:14 PM] Foucault: that is so badass<br />
[12/22/2011 8:47:21 PM] Student: i thought he was gonna kill me.<br />
He finished 15th in the tournament after shoving A7 into AQ, which I&#8217;m sure was disappointing for him. Still, calls like these are their own reward. You can tell just from this snippet of conversation how sophisticated his thought process was and how excited he was to make the right play when it required something as courageous as calling three barrels for his whole stack with no pair. Hands like these you remember for the rest of your career.</p>
<p>Tres bien!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/coaching-brag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Barrels, King-High</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/three-barrels-king-high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/three-barrels-king-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foucault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLHE MTT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet sizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuation bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hero call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loose aggressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-limit hold 'em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarized range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-bluff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Session Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple barrel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=8162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Villain had high Attempt to Steal and post-flop aggression. I debated 3-betting, since I&#8217;m well ahead of his pre-flop range, but I didn&#8217;t want to fold to a 4-bet, and I think getting it in pre is kinda light. It&#8217;s probably slightly +EV, but I hate giving away the advantage of position by just shoveling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Villain had high Attempt to Steal and post-flop aggression. I debated 3-betting, since I&#8217;m well ahead of his pre-flop range, but I didn&#8217;t want to fold to a 4-bet, and I think getting it in pre is kinda light. It&#8217;s probably slightly +EV, but I hate giving away the advantage of position by just shoveling all the money in immediately. I&#8217;d say I was able to achieve a better outcome:</p>
<p>PokerStars No-Limit Hold&#8217;em, 215 Tournament, 100/200 Blinds 20 Ante (9 handed) &#8211; <a href="http://www.flopturnriver.com/reviews/Online-Poker-PokerStars.php#converter">PokerStars</a> Converter Tool from <a href="http://www.flopturnriver.com">FlopTurnRiver.com</a></p>
<p>MP1 (t6200)<br />
MP2 (t4885)<br />
MP3 (t18909)<br />
CO (t8649)<br />
Button (t9197)<br />
SB (t18572)<br />
Hero (BB) (t8618)<br />
UTG (t4020)<br />
UTG+1 (t10725)</p>
<p><span style="color: #009b00;"><strong>Hero&#8217;s M</strong>: 17.95</span></p>
<p><strong>Preflop</strong>: Hero is BB with K♣, Q♣<br />
<span style="color: #666666;"><em>7 folds</em></span>, <span style="color: #cc3333;">SB bets t400</span>, Hero calls t200</p>
<p><strong>Flop</strong>: (t980) 2♣, A♣, 9♠ <span style="color: #009b00;">(2 players)</span><br />
<span style="color: #cc3333;">SB bets t400</span>, Hero calls t400</p>
<p><strong>Turn</strong>: (t1780) 10♥ <span style="color: #009b00;">(2 players)</span><br />
<span style="color: #cc3333;">SB bets t600</span>, Hero calls t600</p>
<p><strong>River</strong>: (t2980) 2♠ <span style="color: #009b00;">(2 players)</span><br />
<span style="color: #cc3333;">SB bets t1400</span>, Hero calls t1400</p>
<p><strong>Total pot:</strong> t5780</p>
<p>Results:<br />
SB had Q♦, J♠ (one pair, twos).<br />
Hero had K♣, Q♣ (one pair, twos).<br />
Outcome: Hero won t5780</p>
<p>We know that at least early in the hand Villain&#8217;s ranges are really wide. He&#8217;s opening a lot of hands pre-flop and betting this flop with almost everything. The trouble is that most steal-happy MTT players aren&#8217;t good at balancing all that bluffing with appropriately wide value ranges. I&#8217;m not even sure he&#8217;d play AK this way, let alone anything less. That makes it very hard for him to have a value hand. Add to that that my hand looks a lot like a busted draw, giving him incentive to try to bluff-catch his medium strength hands, and I think we&#8217;re looking at a very polarized range here. Of course it&#8217;s a hell of a lot easier to have air than two pair, so call call call!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thinkingpoker.net/2011/12/three-barrels-king-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

