<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
xmlns:rawvoice="https://blubrry.com/developer/rawvoice-rss/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Even on the River, Your Bluffing Range Matters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/</link>
	<description>Weekly poker podcast hosted by Andrew Brokos and Nate Meyvis featuring interviews with famous and behind-the-scenes figures from the poker world as well as an in-depth poker strategy segment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: foucault		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/#comment-3947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foucault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3421#comment-3947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/#comment-3946&quot;&gt;Pete&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s not a terrible call, but no, I&#039;m definitely not sure it&#039;s +EV. I was a little tilted because he was playing back at me on every paired board. It depends how wide his range for doing this is, which I can&#039;t be sure of, but if I don&#039;t even beat his entire bluffing range, then he&#039;s got to floating awfully wide out of position.

If I raised river and he called... yeah that would be pretty sick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/#comment-3946">Pete</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a terrible call, but no, I&#8217;m definitely not sure it&#8217;s +EV. I was a little tilted because he was playing back at me on every paired board. It depends how wide his range for doing this is, which I can&#8217;t be sure of, but if I don&#8217;t even beat his entire bluffing range, then he&#8217;s got to floating awfully wide out of position.</p>
<p>If I raised river and he called&#8230; yeah that would be pretty sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2009/10/even-on-the-river-your-bluffing-range-matters/#comment-3946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingpoker.net/?p=3421#comment-3946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Damn, that&#039;s a thin call with just Q high.  And I&#039;m sure that&#039;s like a +EV play too, right? HU sure is excitingly crazy.  Can he call if you raised him?...hahahha that&#039;d be such a fishy line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that&#8217;s a thin call with just Q high.  And I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s like a +EV play too, right? HU sure is excitingly crazy.  Can he call if you raised him?&#8230;hahahha that&#8217;d be such a fishy line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
