More Than One Way to Skin a Fish

I expected my American coaching business to dry up after Black Friday. Of course I did lose some US online players, but I also got some new students who were mostly live players. Interestingly, these haven’t generally been online players “making the switch” but people who have always played live and had some success but want to win more or in bigger games.

These folks generally have some bad habits to break, nittiness chief among them. The thing is that there is so much low-hanging fruit in small-stakes live games that many players can win just by waiting for big hands and then stacking people who can’t fold. I have to make them see the difference between a mediocre winner who waits for golden opportunities and a great player who creates profitable opportunities.

This is important in bigger games where there are fewer fish. When there is someone spewing money, the whole table is drooling over him, and you if you wait for a perfect spot, he’ll probably go broke to someone else before you get your chance.

Although it’s played online, this is a good example of picking off a spewing maniac with a less-than-premium hand:

PokerStars No-Limit Hold’em, $4.00 BB (6 handed) – PokerStars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

SB ($400)
BB ($439.20)
UTG ($475.50)
MP ($678.20)
CO ($317)
Hero (Button) ($404)

Preflop: Hero is Button with Q♦, K♣
1 fold, MP bets $12, 1 fold, Hero calls $12, 2 folds

Flop: ($30) A♣, 10♥, 10♠ (2 players)
MP bets $16, Hero calls $16

Turn: ($62) 3♥ (2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $22, MP raises to $100, Hero calls $78

River: ($262) 6♦ (2 players)
MP bets $550.20 (All-In), Hero calls $276 (All-In)

Total pot: $814 | Rake: $3

Results:
Hero had Q♦, K♣ (one pair, tens).
MP had 4♦, 8♦ (one pair, tens).
Outcome: Hero won $811

The nitty way to play this would be to check the turn and then call or check back the river, but that probably wins you well under $100.

12 thoughts on “More Than One Way to Skin a Fish”

    • He wouldn’t try to represent a T when he has an A. If successful, he would bluff me off of hands that are drawing dead against him and get action only when he’s beat. Even if he knew I was going to call down with KQ here it would still be a bad way to play a weak Ace.

  1. That makes sense for the river all-in, but I guess my question is how you (or really, I) can call the c/r on the turn.

    I’m particularly interested because I see a lot of hands like this, particularly at 2/4, which is where I (used to) play. So my thought process is as follows: Villain’s c-bet on the flop looks like either value betting a garbage A (which makes sense given that this is 2/4, table read, etc.) or of course a bluff. So I would have called here, too. I certainly don’t read that as a T or trying to rep a T.

    Then he checks the turn, so I too would have led out with a bet. When he c/r there, it looks like repping A3, which is squarely within his range. Obviously I think the A3 has a strong chance of being a bluff, but since I think the bottom of his range includes an awful lot of Ax that has me beat, I reluctantly fold here. Obviously I’m getting outplayed when I do that, so I guess I’m trying to figure out where my read is going wrong.

    Thanks!

    • Hey Andrew T,

      I’m not Foucault but I can answer this question.

      I think your assessment of his turn range is incorrect. On the turn, villain is representing a very polarized range. Basically – he’s either repping Trips+, or a bluff. With A3, even a fish knows he’s still playing the 2 10’s on board (ATT3 not A33T), so if he did have a weak ace, he’d be much more likely to try and get his top pair to showdown than turn it into a bluff. With A3 we’d expect villain to c/c turn and probably c/c most river.

      So, on the turn – his range is much more likely to be a hand weaker than Ax (mostly no pair, fish don’t often turn midpairs into bluffs) or a monster (AA, Tx). I’m not sure why you think his turn c/r looks like A3. Its very uncommon for someone to turn top pair into a bluff, esp on a paired board when he has to be worried about you just having a 10 in your hand.

      Also, vs a range of nuts/air – KQ tends to be better calling hand than say a hand like 88. With KQ we do have a gutter vs Tx, vs a hand like 22 we can spike an ace, K, Q or our gutshot, and vs a hand like QJ he’s pretty much drawing dead.

  2. Is there not a big risk that you can’t beat some of his bluffs here (i.e 3x, 6x, PP’s). I seem to recall you posting about this issue fairly recently (or at least I read it somewhere on your site).

    • I think the point is that all hands with show down value will attempt to show down. So Villain checks all pocket pairs and all Ax, 3x and 6x on the river. The read is that Villain is a spewing maniac so the key to this hand, as I see it, is the $22 bet on the turn. This is like a red rag to a bull due to its size relative to the pot and has the effect of massively widening Villain’s spew range relative to the small value range of AA, Tx which we think he would bet smaller with anyway.

      • I can see a medium PP trying to get to showdown, but why wouldn’t a 3 or maybe 22 c/r the turn and turn their hand into a bluff?

        • Hero is getting ~2:1 to call river – meaning we need to have the best hand ~33% of the time to justify calling.

          Much of this hand comes down to combinatorics – and while it’s a valid point that hero’s KQ high actually may trail some % of villains bluffing range, its not enough overall to worry about.

          If we assume villain plays 50% of hands pre-flop and has a proclivity to spew, its not unreasonable to think villain has a turn C/R range of ~30% of his starting range (discounting hands like JJ-KK, weak Ax hands that he’d never do this with).

          Thats a TON of hand combos! Even if he does occasionally show up with a 6x, or 22 hand, he still has SO many hands that lose to KQ on this river. Any heart FD, any broadway gutshot, and of course any spewy bluff (48s, J7o, Q4s, etc)

          While its a good and important point to remember when bluffcatching that you want to be ahead of some of his bluffs (ie – calling here with Q high would be less good than K high, since you lose to more KJ, KQ, K3s type hands), you still want to look at your decision as a comparison of ranges – and here Hero deduced that villain will be bluffing w/ worse than KQ high more than 33% of the time to justify calling.

    • edit – rest of msg cut off:

      3-bet pre for value I think is almost mandatory here, unless he has a high f3b or high 4b, both of which most 50vpip players don’t.

      otherwise looks good!

Comments are closed.